Cover not available

Article published In: Literacies in Contact
Edited by Manuela Böhm and Constanze Weth
[Written Language & Literacy 23:2] 2020
► pp. 251–271

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The advanced acquisition of orthography in heritage Turkish in Germany

 | University of Potsdam
Published online: 2 February 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00043.sch
Abstract
The paper investigates Turkish texts from heritage speakers of Turkish in Germany in a pseudo-longitudinal setting, looking at pupils’ texts from the 5th, 7th, 10th and 12th grades. Two types of dynamics are identified in the advanced acquisition
of Turkish orthography in the heritage context. One is the dynamic of language contact, where in certain areas of the orthography, we find a re-interpretation of Turkish principles according to the German model. However, this changes as the pupils grow up. The second dynamic is the heritage situation. The heritage situation on one side leads to the establishment of new practices, and it also leads to a higher degree of variability of spelling solutions in those areas, where the orthographic system of Turkish poses challenges to every writer, whether monolingual and growing up in Turkey or heritage speaker.
Article outline
  • 1.1Acquisition of literacy in a heritage language
  • 1.2Turkish in Germany
  • 2.Data
  • 3.Phenomena under investigation
    • 3.1Challenges
      • 3.1.1Morphological constancy
      • 3.1.2The representation of glides and long vowels
      • 3.1.3The spelling of the orthographic word
    • 3.2Contrasts and dynamics of contact between the orthographic systems
  • 4.Error analysis
    • 4.1Error categories
      • 4.1.1Errors related to the phonographic level of orthography (P)
      • 4.1.2Errors related to the logographic level of orthography (L)
      • 4.1.3Graphemic errors (G)
  • 5.Quantitative description of error relations
    • 5.1Overall error assessment
    • 5.2A closer look at the phonographic and the logographic levels
      • 5.2.1Phonographic level
      • 5.2.2Logographic level
    • 5.3Intermediate results and first discussions
  • 6.The spelling of the orthographic word
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (27)
References
Bereiter, Carl. (1980). Development in writing. In Lee Gregg & Erwin Steinberg (eds.), Cognitive processes in writing, 73–93. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth & Ludo Verhoeven. (2002). Developing text-production abilities across languages, genre and modality. Written Language and Literacy 5(1): 1–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bredel, Ursula. (2006). Die Herausbildung des syntaktischen Prinzips in der Historiogenese und in der Ontogenese der Schrift. In Ursula Bredel & Hartmut Günther (eds.), Orthographietheorie und Rechtschreibunterricht, 139–164. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bredel, Ursula & Tilo Reißig (eds.) (2011). Weiterführender Orthographieerwerb. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Hohengehren.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bunčić, Daniel. (2004). The apostrophe: A neglected and misunderstood reading aid. Written Language and Literacy 7(2): 185–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feilke, Helmuth. (2003). Entwicklung schriftlich-konzeptualer Fähigkeiten. In Ursula Bredel, Hartmut Günther, Peter Klotz, Jakob Ossner & Gesa Siebert-Ott (eds.), Didaktik der deutschen Sprache. Ein Handbuch. Vol. 11, 178–192. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuhrhop, Nanna. (2008). Das graphematische Wort (im Deutschen): Eine erste Annäherung. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 27(2): 189–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kabak, Barış & Irene Vogel. (2001). The phonological word and stress assignement in Turkish. Phonology 181: 315–360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kalkavan, Zeynep. (2012). Orthographische Markierungen des Deutschen in türkischsprachigen Lernertexten: Ein Indiz für unzureichende Orthographiekenntnisse in der Erstsprache oder Transferleistungen und Rechtschreibbewusstsein? In Wilhelm Grießhaber & Zeynep Kalkavan (eds.), Orthographie- und Schriftspracherwerb bei mehrsprachigen Kindern, 57–80. Freiburg: Fillibach.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirchner, Mark. (1999). Turkish ğ, Deutsch r. In Lars Johanson & Jochen Rehbein (eds), Türkisch und Deutsch im Vergleich, 139–152. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Küppers, Almut, Christoph Schroeder & Işıl Gülbeyaz. (2014). Languages in transition. The situation of Turkish in formal education in Germany. Policy Brief. Istanbul Policy Center. Available at: [URL] (2020-03-23).
Küppers, Almut, Yazgül Şimşek & Christoph Schroeder. (2015). Turkish as a minority language in Germany: Aspects of language development and language instruction. Zeitschrift für Fremdsprachenforschung 26(1): 29–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maas, Utz. (1992). Grundzüge der deutschen Orthographie. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Literat und orat. Grundbegriffe der Analyse gesprochener und geschriebener Sprache. Grazer Linguistische Studien 731: 21–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mehlem, Ulrich. (2010). Schreibanlässe und Schreibprozesse in der Grundschule – wie anschlussfähig für Migrantenkinder? In Ulrich Mehlem & Said Sahel (eds.), Erwerb schriftsprachlicher Kompetenzen im DaZ-Kontext, 133–162. Freiburg: Fillibach.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menz, Astrid. (2006). Kılavuzlarda ve kullanımda Türkçe imlâ [Turkish orthography in theory and practice]. In Astrid Menz & Christoph Schroeder (eds.), Türkiye’de dil tartışmaları [The language debate in Turkey], 41–71. İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menz, Astrid & Christoph Schroeder. (2007). Türkçenin yazımına yeni bir yaklaşım: Sesbilimselliğin mitinin sorgulanması [A new approach to Turkish orthography: Challenging the myth of phonological shallowness]. In Yeşim Aksan & Mustafa Aksan (eds.), XXI Ulusal Dilbilim Kurultayı Bildirileri, 1–9. Mersin: Mersin Üniversitesi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2015). Schrifterwerb in der Türkei (und türkischer Schriftspracherwerb in Deutschland). In Christa Röber & Helena Olfert (eds.), Schriftsprach- und Orthographieerwerb: Erstlesen, Erstschreiben, 55–68. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Hohengehren.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Öney, Banu & Aydin Durgunoğlu. (1997). Beginning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics 181: 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schellhardt, Christin & Christoph Schroeder (eds.) (2015). MULTILIT. Manual, criteria of transcription and analysis for German, Turkish and English. Potsdam: Universi- tätsverlag. Available at: [URL] (2020-04-13).
Schroeder, Christoph. (2014). Türkische Texte türkisch-deutscher Schülerinnen und Schüler in Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 44(2): 24–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). Orthography in German-Turkish language contact. In Fabienne Baider (ed.), Emprunts linguistiques, empreintes culturelles: Métissage orient-occident, 101–122. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schroeder, Christoph & Almut Küppers. (2016). Türkischunterricht im deutschen Schulsystem: Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven. In Barbara Pusch, Almut Küppers & Pınar Uyan-Semerci (eds.), Education in transnational spaces: Theory, practice and research based on German-Turkish examples, 191–212. Berlin: Springer VS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schroeder, Christoph & Yazgül Şimşek. (2010). Die Entwicklung der Kategorie Wort im Türkisch-Deutsch bilingualen Schrifterwerb in Deutschland. IMIS Beiträge 371: 55–79.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sürig, Inken, Yazgül Şimşek, Christoph Schroeder & Anja Boneß. (2016). Literacy acquisition in school in the context of migration and multilingualism: A binational survey. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry & Jeroen van de Weijer. (1991). Topics in Turkish Phonology. In Hendrik Boeschoten & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Turkish linguistics today, 11–59. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiese, Richard. (2004). How to optimize orthography. Written Language & Literacy 7(2): 305–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Dağdeviren Kırmızı, Gülin & Melike Üzüm
2025. Turkish as a heritage language: A scoping review of previous studies and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Bilingualism DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue