Cover not available

Article published In: Written Language & Literacy
Vol. 23:1 (2020) ► pp.92–108

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Comprehension and metacomprehension of negated text

Is retrieval practice beneficial for understanding?

 | SUNY Brockport
 | SUNY Brockport
Published online: 19 October 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00034.mar
Abstract
Previous research has demonstrated that negated text is a particularly difficult text construction, and often leads to readers having difficulty understanding and remembering what they have read. To date, attempts at identifying a strategy that would aid in readers’ comprehension of negation have not been successful. However, in studies focused on affirmative text, readers practicing retrieving information from a text showed improvements in comprehension and more accurate metacomprehension judgments. The present study aimed to determine whether this strategy also benefits readers of passages in which a critical concept has been negated. Interestingly, results demonstrated that while readers judged their comprehension to be better when practicing retrieval, their comprehension was not actually better. These results suggest that simply practicing retrieval information is not necessarily enough to enhance comprehension or metacomprehension of this text construction.
Article outline
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Design
    • Materials
    • Procedure
  • Results
    • Comprehension accuracy
    • Metacomprehension judgment
  • Discussion
  • References
References (48)
References
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 81, 47–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(5), 1118–1133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cornish, E. R. (1971). Pragmatic aspects of negation in sentence evaluation and completion tasks. British Journal of Psychology, 62(4), 505–511. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cornish, E. R., & Wason, P. C. (1970). The recall of affirmative and negative sentences in an incidental learning task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22(2), 109–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual difference in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 191, 450–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 31, 422–433. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dale, R., & Duran, N. (2011). The cognitive dynamics of negated sentence verification. Cognitive Science, 351, 983–996. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Beni, R., Borella, E., & Carretti, B. (2007). Reading comprehension in aging: The role of working memory and metacomprehension. Aging, Neuropsychology, And Cognition, 14(2), 189–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. R. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 228–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 111, 19–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flesch, R. (1951). How to test readability. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Aschkenazi, K., & Alkabets-Zlozover, I. (2007). Negation in context: A functional approach to suppression. Discourse Processes, 43(2), 153–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gough, P. B. (1965). Grammatical transformations and speed of understanding. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 4(2), 107–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 221, pp. 193–225). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoosain, R. (1973). The processing of negation. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12(6), 618–626. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karpicke, J. D. (2009). Metacognitive control and strategy selection: Deciding to practice retrieval during learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(4), 469–486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Tridgell, J. M. (1972). When negation is easier than affirmation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 241, 87–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaup, B. (2001). Negation and its impact on the accessibility of text information. Memory & Cognition, 29(7), 960–967. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaup, B., & Zwaan, R. A. (2003). Effects of negation and situational presence on the accessibility of text information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 291, 439–446.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaup, B.¸., Lüdtke, J., Zwaan, R. A. (2006). Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates: Is a door that is not open mentally closed? Journal of Pragmatics, 38(7), 1033–1050. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaup, B., Zwaan, R. A., & Lüdtke, J. (2007). The experiential view of language comprehension: How is negation represented?. In F. Schmalhofer, C. A. Perfetti, F. Schmalhofer, C. A. Perfetti (Eds.) Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes (pp. 255–288). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littrell-Baez, M. K., Friend, A., Caccamise, D., & Okochi, C. (2015). Using Retrieval Practice and Metacognitive Skills to Improve Content Learning. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(8), 682–689. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lüdtke, J., & Kaup, B. (2006). Context effects when reading negative and affirmative sentences. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1735–1740).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maki, R. H., Shields, M., Wheeler, A. E., & Zacchilli, T. L. (2005). Individual differences in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 723–731. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Margolin, S. J., & Abrams, L. (2009). Not may not be too difficult: The effects of negation on older adults’ sentence comprehension. Educational Gerontology, 351, 308–322. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Margolin, S. J., & Hover, P. A. (2011). Metacomprehension and negation: Assessing readers’ awareness of the difficulty of negated text. Reading Psychology, 321, 158–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Margolin, S. J. (2013). Can bold typeface improve readers’ comprehension and metacomprehension of negation? Reading Psychology, 34(1), 85–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Older adults’ comprehension of transformational and deactivation negation. Educational Gerontology, 41(8), 604–612. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Margolin, S. J., & Snyder, N. (2018). It may not be that difficult the second time around: The effects of rereading on the comprehension and metacomprehension of negated text. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 392–402. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. D., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Redick, T. S., Bunting, M., & Engle, R. W. (2019). The role of maintenance and disengagement in predicting reading comprehension and vocabulary learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDaniel, M. A., Howard, D. C., & Einstein, G. O. (2009). The read-recite-review study strategy: Effective and portable. Psychological Science (0956–7976), 20(4), 516–522. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., & Just, M. A. (1989). Changes in activation levels with negation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(4), 633–642. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mehler, J. (1963). Some effects of grammatical transformation on the recall of English sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 2(4), 346–351. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nieuwland, M., & Kuperberg, G. (2008). When the truth is not too hard to handle. Psychological Science, 191, 1213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nordmeyer, A. E. and Frank, M. C. (2014). A pragmatic account of the processing of negative sentences. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orenes, I., Moxey, L., Scheepers, C., & Santamaría, C. (2016). Negation in context: Evidence from the visual world paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(6), 1082–1092. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pettijohn, K. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (2016). Narrative event boundaries, reading times, and expectation. Memory & Cognition, 44(7), 1064–1075. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roediger III, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(3), 181–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sherman, M. A. (1973). Bound to be easier? The negative prefix and sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 121, 76–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thiede, K. W., Wiley, J., & Griffin, T. D. (2011). Test expectancy affects metacomprehension accuracy. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 264–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tian, Y., & Breheny, R. (2015). Dynamic Pragmatic View of Negation Processing. Negation and Polarity: Experimental Perspectives, 21–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 281, 127–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1987). Episodic models in discourse processing. In R. Horowitz, S. J. Samuels, R. Horowitz, S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 161–196). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (2001). Age, working memory, and on-line syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 16(1), 128–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weaver, C. A. (1990). Constraining factors in calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(2), 214–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weaver, C. A., & Bryant, D. S. (1995). Monitoring of comprehension: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text. Memory & Cognition, 23(1), 12–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Margolin, Sara J. & Timothy Brackins
2024. The impact of rereading on older adults’ comprehension and metacomprehension of negative text. Educational Gerontology 50:1 ► pp. 76 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue