Introduction published In: Writing Systems: Past, present (… and future?)
Edited by Terry Joyce and Robert Crellin
[Written Language & Literacy 22:2] 2019
► pp. 167–178
Introduction
Writing systems
Past, present (… and future?)
This article is available free of charge.
Published online: 30 March 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00024.joy
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00024.joy
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Writing systems along the temporal dimension
- 3.Universal themes that transcend time
- The pervasive nature of orthographic variation
- Enduring issues for writing systems research
- Acknowledgement
- Note
References
References (15)
Coulmas, Florian. (1996). Typology of writing systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research] Vol. 21, 1380–1387. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Daniels, Peter T. (1990). Fundamentals of grammatology. Journal of the American Oriental Society 110(4): 727–731.
(1996). Aramaic scripts for Aramaic languages. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 499–504. New York: Oxford University Press.
Frost, Ram, Leonard Katz & Shlomo Bentin. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 131: 104–115.
Gelb, Ignace J. (1963). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35.
Joyce, Terry, Bor Hodošček, & Hisashi Masuda. (2012). Orthographic representation and variation within the Japanese writing system: Some corpus-based observations. Written Language & Literacy, 15(2), 254–278.
King, Ross. (1996). Korean writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 218–227. New York: Oxford University Press.
Neef, Martin. (2012). Graphematics as part of a modular theory of phonographic writing systems. Writing Systems Research, 4(2), 214–228.
. (2015). Writing systems as modular objects: proposals for theory design in grapholinguistics. Open Linguistics, 11, 708–721.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
