In:Dialect on Air: Bahamian Creole in historical radio broadcasts
Diana Wengler
[Varieties of English Around the World G71] 2025
► pp. ix–xii
List of tables
Table 3.1Overview of variables and data sets used for comparisons26
Table 4.1Frequencies of zero copula in BahCE by data set and following grammatical environment41
Table 4.2Copula variants in The Fergusons by temporal reference42
Table 4.3Copula variant by following grammatical context in The Fergusons43
Table 4.4Copula variant by subject type in The Fergusons46
Table 4.5Copula variant by preceding phonological context in The Fergusons47
Table 4.6Copula variant by following phonological context in The Fergusons48
Table 4.7Following phonological context by NP, AdjP and VP in The Fergusons48
Table 4.8Copula variant by prestige of character and addressee in The Fergusons50
Table 4.9Copula variant by prestige dyad of character and addressee in The Fergusons50
Table 4.10Copula variant by gender of character and addressee in The Fergusons51
Table 4.11Copula variant by gender dyad of character and addressee in The Fergusons51
Table 4.12Be variants by temporal reference in The Fergusons68
Table 4.13Ain’t in BahCE by study, verb paradigm and lect81
Table 4.14Variants of be negation by temporal reference84
Table 4.15Variants of have negation85
Table 4.16Variants of do negation by temporal reference86
Table 4.17Variants of do negation by stativity and temporal reference87
Table 4.18Variants of do negation by subject type and temporal reference88
Table 4.19Variants of do negation by negative concord and temporal reference89
Table 4.20Overview of predictors and predictor levels for do negation89
Table 5.1Results from acoustic studies of low vowels in BahCE by lexical set103
Table 5.2Low vowels by lexical set in The Fergusons105
Table 5.3Low vowels by character and lexical set in The Fergusons105
Table 5.4Low vowels by following phonological context and lexical set in The Fergusons106
Table 5.5Mean formant and duration values by lexical set in The Fergusons107
Table 5.6Median Mahalanobis distances for short and long low vowels in two dimensions (2D: F1′xF2′, 3D: F1′xF2′x duration) and
proportions of overlap between vowel pairs by voicing context in The Fergusons107
Table 5.7Percentages of overlap between short and long low vowels in two dimensions (2D: F1′xF2′, 3D: F1′xF2′x duration) by voicing
context in acrolectal and mesolectal urban Bahamian speech (from Kraus
2017: 253)109
Table 5.8Significant effects and interactions from linear mixed model analysis of low vowels110
Table 5.9Mean F1′ and F2′ values and standard deviations for word forms of ask and ax for F1′ and F2′121
Table 5.10Statistical significances between word forms of ask and ax for F1′ and F2′121
Table 5.11Results from acoustic studies of mouth and price in BahCE132
Table 5.12mouth and price by character and lexical set in The Fergusons133
Table 5.13mouth and price by following phonological context in The Fergusons134
Table 5.14Log ratios and standard deviations for mouth and price by vowel position and following phonological
context138
Table 5.15Significant effects and interactions from mixed model analysis of mouth139
Table 5.16Significant effects and interactions from mixed model analysis of price141
Table 6.1Variables in terms of their linguistic, individual
and social differentiation158
and social differentiation158
Table 6.2Predicted F2′ trap values for Minna Ferguson by addressee160
Table 6.3Mean character rankings and standard deviations by variable type165
