Cover not available

In:New Englishes, New Methods:
Edited by Guyanne Wilson and Michael Westphal
[Varieties of English Around the World G68] 2023
► pp. 65–83

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

New Englishes and Conversation Analysis

Turn-taking as a factor in explaining syntactic variation

ORCiD logo with link | TU Dortmund University
Published online: 14 April 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g68.04neu
Abstract
This study assesses the potential of using conversation analytic methodology to investigate syntactic variation in New Englishes. It analyses transcripts and audio files of face-to-face interactions between speakers of Caribbean and Southeast Asian Englishes and illustrates how syntax provides essential clues allowing interactants to project upcoming places of speaker change. Current speakers might adapt their turns underway to avoid transition to a next speaker, but speaker groups differ when it comes to which syntactic constructions they prefer in this context. As these interactional preferences seem to correlate with linguistic preferences (such as a high frequency of topicalization), the present study suggests that they constitute a case of emergent grammar, and hence should be considered a factor in investigating syntactic variation.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
    • 2.1Topicalization and pivot constructions
    • 2.2Turn construction and turn allocation
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Pivot constructions as a turn-holding strategy
    • 4.2Syntactic turn-holding strategies in New Englishes
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (42)
References
Auer, Peter. 2009. “On-line Syntax: Thoughts on the Temporality of Spoken Language.” Language Sciences 31: 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buschfeld, Sarah, & Alexander Kautzsch. 2017. “Towards an Integrated Approach to Postcolonial and Non-Postcolonial Englishes.” World Englishes 36 (1): 104–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 2013. “Turn-Constructional Units and the Transition-Relevance Place.” The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, eds. by Jack Sidnell, & Tanya Stivers, 150–166. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, & Tsuyoshi Ono. 2007. “‘Incrementing’ in Conversation: A Comparison of Practices in English, German and Japanese.” Pragmatics 17 (4): 513–552.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, & Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deuber, Dagmar. 2010. “Standard English and Situational Variation: Sociolinguistic Considerations in the Compilations of ICE-Trinidad and Tobago.” ICAME Journal 34: 24–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egbert, Maria M. 1996. “Context-Sensitivity in Conversation: Eye Gaze and the German Repair Initiator ‘Bitte?’.” Language in Society, 25 (4): 587–612. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., & Sandra Thompson. 1996. “Interactional Units in Conversation: Syntactic, Intonational, and Pragmatic Resources for the Management of Turns.” Interaction and Grammar, eds. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, & Sandra A. Thompson, 135–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, & Sandra Thompson. 1996. “Practices in the Construction of Turns: The ‘TCU’ Revisited.” Pragmatics 6 (3): 427–454.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
GLOBE. Global Leadership & Organizational Behavior Effectiveness. 2004. An overview of the 2004 study: Understanding the Relationship Between National Culture, Societal Effectiveness and Desirable Leadership Attributes. <[URL]> (12 July 2022).
Görlach, Manfred. 2002. Still More Englishes. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto. 2005. “Joint Construction through Language and the Body: Notes on Embodiment in Coordinated Participation in Situated Activities.” Semiotica 156: 21–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa, & Galina B. Bolden. 2017. Transcribing for Social Research. Los Angeles: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1992. “Times of the Sign: On Temporality in Recent Linguistics.” Time and Society 1 (2): 223–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. “The Openness of Grammatical Constructions.” Papers from the 40th Regional Meetings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 40 (2): 143–175.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie, & Simona Pekarek Doehler. 2014. “‘Pivotage’ in French Talk-in-Interaction: On the Emergent Nature of [Clause-NP-Clause] Pivots.” Pragmatics 24 (3): 593–622.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ingelhart, Ronald et al. 2014. World Values Survey. Round Six – Country Pooled Datafile Version. <[URL]> (12 July 2022).
Pekarek Doehler, Simona. 2011. “Emergent Grammar for all Practical Purposes: The On-line Formatting of Left and Right Dislocations in French Conversation.” Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, eds. by Peter Auer, & Stefan Pfänder, 45–87. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leuckert, Sven. 2019. Topicalization in Asian Englishes: Forms, Functions, and Frequencies of a Fronting Construction. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C., & Francisco Torreira. 2015. “Timing in Turn-Taking and its Implications for Processing Models of Language.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 1992. English in Language Shift: The History, Structure and Sociolinguistics of South African Indian English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Minow, Verena. 2010. Variation in the Grammar of Black South African English. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neumaier, Theresa. 2019. Patterns of Conversational Interaction in Varieties of English. PhD dissertation, University of Regensburg.
. 2023. Conversation in World Englishes: Turn-Taking and Cultural Variation in Southeast Asian and Caribbean English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. “Notes on Methodology.” Structures of Social Interaction: Studies in Conversation Analysis, eds. by Richard Bauman, & Joel Sherzer, 337–353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, & Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” Interaction and Grammar, eds. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, & Sandra A. Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. “Ten Operations in Self-Initiated, Same-Turn Repair.” Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, eds. by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, & Jack Sidnell, 41–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheutz, Hannes. 2005. “Pivot Constructions in Spoken German.” Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, eds. by Auli Hakulinen, & Margret Selting, 103–128. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, Margret. 2000. “The Construction of Units in Conversational Talk.” Language in Society 29 (4): 477–517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Fragments of Units as Deviant Cases of Unit Production in Conversational Talk.” Studies in Interactional Linguistics, eds. by Margret Selting, & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 229–258. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. 2007. “Comparative Studies in Conversation Analysis.” Annual Review of Anthropology 36: 229–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009a. “Comparative Perspectives in Conversation Analysis.” Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 3–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. “Language-Specific Resources in Repair and Assessments.” Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 304–325. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya et al. 2009. “Universals and Cultural Variation in Turn-Taking in Conversation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 106: 10587–10592. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, Gareth. 2007. “On the Design and Use of Pivots in Everyday English Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (12): 2217–2243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winkle, Claudia. 2015. Non-Canonical Structures, They Use Them Differently: Information Packaging in Spoken Varieties of English. PhD dissertation, University of Freiburg.
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Jackson, Samantha, Philipp Meer & Mirjam Schmalz
2025. Trinidad and Tobago, English and Creoles in. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of World Englishes, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue