Cover not available

In:Modeling World Englishes: Assessing the interplay of emancipation and globalization of ESL varieties
Edited by Sandra C. Deshors
[Varieties of English Around the World G61] 2018
► pp. 245–280

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

A corpus-linguistic account of the history of the genitive alternation in Singapore English

 | University of California at Santa Barbara
 | Justus Liebig University Giessen
 | Liebig University Giessen
Published online: 13 September 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g61.10gri
Abstract
In this paper, we are exploring the history of the genitive alternation (of- vs. s-genitive) in Singapore English based on corpus data covering both British English (as the historical input variety) and Singapore English (as the target variety whose diachronic development we are interested in). Specifically, while earlier research has produced partly diachronic accounts of genitive variability, the diachronic development of the genitive has so far not been studied in ESL contexts, a gap which this study attempts to fill. Nearly 7000 instances of of- and s-genitives were annotated for a large number of predictors including phonetic variables (e.g. final sibilancy of possessor), semantic variables (e.g. animacy of possessor/possessum), syntactic variables (e.g. length of possessor/possessum), and pragmatic variables (e.g. discourse accessibility of possessor/possessum). We then applied the method of Multifactorial Prediction and Deviation Analysis with Regressions/Random Forests to the data to explore (i) how genitive choices in Singapore English differ from those in British English and, after a methodological interlude, (ii) how genitive choices changed over time in Singapore English. We conclude with some important recommendations regarding diachronic studies of structural nativization and their theoretical implications in models such as those of Moag (1982) or Schneider (2003, 2007).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Theoretical considerations
    • 1.2Methodological considerations
  • 2.A MuPDAR analysis of SinE 1990 with reference to BrE 1990
    • 2.1Methods
      • 2.1.1Generating and annotating the concordance data
      • 2.1.2Statistical analysis
    • 2.2Results of R2
      • 2.2.1FinSib × Animacy
      • 2.2.2LengthDiff × FinSib
      • 2.2.3LengthDiff × Definiteness
      • 2.2.4TTR × Animacy
    • 2.3Discussion
  • 3.A diachronic MuPDAR analysis of SinE
    • 3.1Methods
      • 3.1.1Generating and annotating the concordance data
      • 3.1.2Statistical analysis
    • 3.2Results part 1: ‘Positives’
      • 3.2.1LengthDiff × FinSib
      • 3.2.2LengthDiff × Definiteness
      • 3.2.3FinSib × Animacy
      • 3.2.4TTR × Animacy
    • 3.3Results part 2: ‘Negatives’
      • 3.3.1Definiteness × Animacy
      • 3.3.2LengthDiff × PrevChoice
      • 3.3.3TTR × PrevChoice
  • 4.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgement
  • References
References (48)
References
Behaghel, O. 1909. Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. Indogermanische Forschungen 25(1): 110–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernaisch, T. 2015. The Lexis and Lexicogrammar of Sri Lankan English [Varieties of English Around the World G54]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2015. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, A. 2016. English in the Netherlands: Functions, Forms and Attitudes [Varieties of English Around the World G56]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fong, V. 2004. The verbal cluster. In Singapore English: A Grammatical Description [Varieties of English Around the World G33], L. Lim (ed.), 75–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grafmiller, J. 2014. Variation in English genitives across modality and genres. English Language and Linguistics 18(3): 471–496.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenbaum, S. 1991. ICE: The International Corpus of English. English Today 7: 3–7.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 1996. Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. & Adelman, A. 2014. Subject realization in Japanese conversation by native and non-native speakers: Exemplifying a new paradigm for learner corpus research. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014: New Empirical and Theoretical Paradigms, J. Romero-Trillo (ed.), 35–54. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. & Deshors, S. 2014. Using regressions to explore deviations between corpus data and a standard/target: Two suggestions. Corpora 9(1): 109–136.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. & Deshors, S. 2015. EFL and/vs. ESL? A multi-level regression modeling perspective on bridging the paradigm gap. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1): 130–159.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, R. Jr. 1962. The life cycle of pidgin languages. Lingua 11(1): 151–156.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heller, B., Bernaisch, T. & Gries, S. Th. 2017. Empirical perspectives on two potential epicenters: The genitive alternation in Asian Englishes. ICAME Journal 41: 111–144.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heller, B., Szmrecsanyi, B. & Grafmiller, J. 2017. Stability and fluidity in syntactic variation world-wide: The genitive alternation across varieties of English. Journal of English Linguistics 45 (1): 3–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinrichs, L. & Szmrecsanyi, B. 2007. Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive constructions: A multivariate analysis of tagged corpora. English Language and Linguistics 11(3): 437–474.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S. 2013. The Corpus of Historical Singapore English – Practical and methodological issues. UCREL Corpus Research Seminar. <[URL]> (26 June 2017).
Hoffmann, S., Hundt, M. & Mukherjee, J. 2011. Indian English – An emerging epicentre? A pilot study on light verbs in web-derived corpora of South Asian Englishes. Anglia 129(3–4): 258–280.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S., Sand, A. & Tan, P. 2012. The Corpus of Historical Singapore English – A first pilot study on data from the 1950s and 1960s. Paper presented at ICAME 33 , University of Leuven, Belgium.
Huber, M. 2012. Syntactic and variational complexity in British and Ghanaian English. Relative clause formation in the written parts of the International Corpus of English. In Linguistic Complexity. Second Language Acquisition, Indigenization, Contact, B. Kortmann & B. Szmrecsanyi (eds), 218–242. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kachru, B. 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, R. Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (eds), 11–20. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, C. 1995. Changing patterns of complementation and concomitant grammaticalisation of the verb Help in present-day British English. In The Verb in Contemporary English, B. Aarts & C. Meyer (eds), 258–272. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. Three changing patterns of verb complementation in Late Modern English: A real-time study based on matching text corpora. English Language and Linguistics 6(1): 105–131.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McArthur, T. 1987. The English languages? English Today 3(3): 9–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moag, R. 1982. The life cycle of non-native Englishes: A case study. In The Other Tongue, B. B. Kachru (ed.), 270–288. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992. The life cycle of non-native Englishes: A case study. In The Other Tongue, 2nd edn, B. B. Kachru (ed.), 233–252. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mukherjee, J. 2008. Sri Lankan English: Evolutionary status and epicentral influence from Indian English. In Anglistentag 2007 Münster: Proceedings , K. Stierstorfer (ed.), 359–368. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noël, D., van Rooy, B. & van der Auwera, J. (eds). 2014. Diachronic approaches to modality in World Englishes. Journal of English Linguistics 42: 3–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Osselton, N. 1988. Thematic genitives. In An Historic Tongue: Studies in English Linguistics in Memory of Barbara Strang, G. Nixon & J. Honey (eds),138–144. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenbach, A. 2005. Animacy versus weight as determinants of grammatical variation in English. Language 81(3): 613–644.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. English genitive variation – The state of the art. English Language and Linguistics 18(2): 215–262.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, E. W. 2003. The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79(2): 233–281.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. How to trace structural nativization: Particle verbs in world Englishes. World Englishes 23(2): 227–249.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, E. W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of World Englishes. World Englishes 33(1): 9–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strevens, P. 1980. Teaching English as an International Language: From Practice to Principle. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B. 2006. Morphosyntactic Persistence in Spoken English. A Corpus Study at the Intersection of Variationist Sociolinguistics, Psycholinguistics, and Discourse Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B., Grafmiller, J., Heller, B. & Röthlisberger, M. 2016. Around the world in three alternations: Modeling syntactic variation in varieties of English. English World-Wide 37(2): 109–137.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wulff, S., Gries, S. Th. & Lester, N. Forthcoming. Optional that in complementation by German and Spanish learners: Where and how German and Spanish learners differ from native speakers. In What does Applied Cognitive Linguistics Look Like? Answers from the L2 Classroom and SLA Studies, A. Tyler & C. Moder (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Zwicky, A. 1987. Suppressing the Zs. Journal of Linguistics 23(1): 133–148.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (19)

Cited by 19 other publications

Bolton, Kingsley
2025. World Englishes: Approaches and Models. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of World Englishes, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C.
2025. Grammatical Variation and World Englishes. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of World Englishes, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Neels, Jakob, Sven Leuckert & Arne Lohmann
2025. Grammaticalisation of habitual aspect in World Englishes: assessing trajectories, areal patterns and rates of change with synchronic corpora. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory DOI logo
Schneider, Edgar W.
2025. The Dynamic Model. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of World Englishes, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gries, Stefan Th.
2024. Against level-3-only analyses in corpus linguistics. ICAME Journal 48:1 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Redelinghuys, Karien
2024. Language contact and change through translation in Afrikaans and South African English. In Constraints on Language Variation and Change in Complex Multilingual Contact Settings [Contact Language Library, 60], ► pp. 58 ff. DOI logo
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong, Mie Hiramoto, Jakob R. E. Leimgruber & Jun Jie Lim
2023. The Corpus of Singapore English Messages (CoSEM). World Englishes 42:2 ► pp. 371 ff. DOI logo
Bernaisch, Tobias, Stefan Th. Gries & Benedikt Heller
2022. Theoretical models and statistical modelling of linguistic epicentres. World Englishes 41:3 ► pp. 333 ff. DOI logo
Collins, Peter Craig
2022. Comment markers in world Englishes. World Englishes 41:2 ► pp. 244 ff. DOI logo
Hackert, Stephanie & Diana Wengler
2022. Recent Grammatical Change in Postcolonial Englishes: A Real-time Study of Genitive Variation in Caribbean and Indian News Writing. Journal of English Linguistics 50:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Laliberté, Catherine
2022. A Diachronic Study of Modals and Semi-modals in Indian English Newspapers. Journal of English Linguistics 50:2 ► pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Peters, Pam & Tobias Bernaisch
2022. The current state of research into linguistic epicentres. World Englishes 41:3 ► pp. 320 ff. DOI logo
Peters, Pam, Adam Smith & Minna Korhonen
2022. Epicentral effects on ‐ed/‐tinflectional variation in Australasian Englishes 1850–2020. World Englishes 41:3 ► pp. 446 ff. DOI logo
Botha, Werner & Tobias Bernaisch
2020. The Features of Asian Englishes. In The Handbook of Asian Englishes, ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Tobias Bernaisch
2020. Corpus Linguistics and Asian Englishes. In The Handbook of Asian Englishes, ► pp. 741 ff. DOI logo
Hundt, Marianne
2019. Corpus-Based Approaches to World Englishes. In The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes, ► pp. 506 ff. DOI logo
Hundt, Marianne
2021. On models and modelling. World Englishes 40:3 ► pp. 298 ff. DOI logo
Kruger, Haidee & Gert De Sutter
2018. Alternations in contact and non-contact varieties. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 1:2 ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Corpora, Constructions, New Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 100], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue