Cover not available

In:World Englishes: New theoretical and methodological considerations
Edited by Elena Seoane and Cristina Suárez-Gómez
[Varieties of English Around the World G57] 2016
► pp. 173–204

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Indian English quotatives in a diachronic perspective

Published online: 25 May 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g57.08dav
The study is a corpus-based variationist analysis tracing the development of quotative marking in Indian English. It seeks to enhance our understanding of the way the quotative system changes over time and complements existing academic research, most of which has primarily explored constructed dialogue in native-speaker English. Stemming from far-flung locales in North America, Great Britain, Australia, and New Zealand, burgeoning findings demonstrate that the system has undergone internal reorganisation, with more traditional elements, say and think, giving way to other forms, notably quotative go and the copula construction be like. Relying on second-language data from the early 1990s and the late 2000s, I mainly explore the gradual retreat of say as a quotative marker in Indian English. More specifically, I look at the changes in the language-internal conditioning through which the decline occurs and examine how those are related to the contexts through which the innovative quotative marker be like is paving its way into the system. All in all, I attempt to establish regularities in the developmental paths of native and non-native quotation. I also point to idiosyncratic developments characterising Indian English quotative marking, while making an effort to tap into their origin.
References (48)
Barbieri, Federica. 2005. Quotative use in American English. A corpus-based, cross-register comparison. Journal of English Linguistics 33(3): 222–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Allan & Sharma, Devyani. 2014. Debate: Media and Language Change. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18(2): 213–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajend M. 2004. Indian English: Syntax. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 2: Morphology and Syntax, Bernd Kortmann, Kate Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie, Edgar W. Schneider & Clive Upton (eds), 1016–1030. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blyth, Carl, Recktenwald, Sigrid & Wang, Jenny. 1990. I’m like, ‘Say what?!’: A new quotative in American oral narrative. American Speech 65(3): 215–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2006. Diagnostics of age-graded linguistic behavior: The case of the quotative system. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(1): 3–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. The localization of global linguistic variants. English World-Wide 29(1): 15–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Quotations across generations: A multivariate analysis of speech and thought introducers across 5 generations of Tyneside speakers. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7(1): 59–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Quotatives. New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. Malden MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle & D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2009. Localized globalization: A multi-local, multivariate investigation of quotative be like . Journal of Sociolinguistics 13(3): 291–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butters, Ronald. 1980. Narrative go “say”. American Speech 55: 304–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1982. Editor’s note [on be like “think”]. American Speech 57: 149.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack K. 1992. Linguistic correlates of gender and sex. English World-Wide 13: 173–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Kerswill, Paul, Fox, Sue & Torgersen, Eivind. 2011. Contact, feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(2): 151–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, Peter (ed.). 2015. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cukor-Avila, Patricia. 2002. She say, she go, she be like: Verbs of quotation over time in African American Vernacular English. American Speech 77: 3–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2004. Contextualizing St. John’s youth English within the Canadian quotative system. Journal of English Linguistics 32(4): 323–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. The diachrony of quotation: Evidence from New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 24(3): 343–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Variation and change. In The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics, Robert Bayley, Richard Cameron & Ceil Lucas (eds), 484–502. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davydova, Julia. 2011. The Present Perfect in Non-Native Englishes. A Corpus-Based Study of Variation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Linguistic change in a multilingual setting: A case study of quotatives in Indian English. In Collins (ed.), 297–334.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durham, Mercedes, Haddican, Bill, Zweig, Eytan, Johnson, Daniel E., Baker, Zipporah, ­Cockeram, David, Danks, Esther & Tyler, Louise. 2012. Constant linguistic effects in the diffusion of be like . Journal of English Linguistics 40(4): 316–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen & Bell, Barbara. 1995. Sociolinguistic variation and discourse function of constructed dialogue introducers: The case of be + like . American Speech 70(3): 265–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Sue. 2012. Performed narrative: the pragmatic function of this is + speaker and other quotatives in London Adolescent Speech. In Quotatives. Cross-linguistic and Cross-disciplinary Perspectives [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 15], Isabelle Buchstaller & Ingrid Van Alphen (eds), 231–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. & Robles, Jessica. 2010. It’s like mmm: Enactmens with it’s like . Discourse Studies 12(6): 715–738. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Höhn, Nicole. 2012. And they were all like ‘What’s going on?’ New quotatives in Jamaican and Irish English. In Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide. Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes [Varieties of English around the World G43], Marianne Hundt & Ulrike Gut (eds), 263–290. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian. 2004. Rescuing traditional (historical) linguistics from grammaticalisation theory. In Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalisation [Typological Studies in Language 59], Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds), 45–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1990. The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2: 205–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald. 2001. You’re like ‘why not?’ The quotative expressions of Glasgow adolescents. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(1): 3–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2009. Corpus linguistics meets sociolinguistics: The role of corpus evidence in the study of sociolinguistic variation and change. In Corpus Linguistics: Refinements and Reassessments, Antoinette Renouf & Andrew Kehoe (eds), 7–32. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend & Bhatt, Rakesh M. 2008. World Englishes. The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rand, David & Sankoff, David. 1990. GoldVarb: A Variable Rule Application for the Macintosh. Montreal, Canada: Centre de Recherche mathématique, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne & Lange, Deborah. 1991. The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalisation in progress. American Speech 66(3): 227–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sayers, Dave. 2014. Focus article: The mediated innovation model: A framework for researching media influence in language change. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18(2): 185–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharma, Devyani. 2009. Typological diversity in New Englishes. English World-Wide 30(2): 170–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Singler, John & Woods, Laurie. 2002. The use of (be) like quotatives in American and non-American newspapers. Paper presented at the 31 NWAV Conference , Stanford University CA, USA.
Shastri, S.V. 2002. Overview of the Indian component of the International Corpus of English. <[URL]>
Stenström, Anna-Brita, Andersen, Gisle & Hasund, Ingrid. 2002. Trends in Teenage Talk. Corpus Compilation, Analysis and Findings [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 8]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sturtevant, Edgard 1947. An Introduction to Linguistic Science. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2012. Variationist Sociolinguistics. Change, Observation, Interpretation. ­Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Hudson, Rachel. 1999. Be like et al. beyond America: The Quotative System in British and Canadian Youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3(2): 147–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2004. He’s like; She’s like: The quotative system in Canadian youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(4): 493–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Frequency and variation in the community grammar: Tracking a new change through the generations. Language Variation and Change 19(2): 199–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85(1): 58–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1974. The semantics of direct and indirect discourse. Papers in Linguistics 7: 267–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 2003. An Introduction to Contact Linguistics. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, Joanne. 2002. Discourse quotatives in Australian English: Adolescents performing voices. Australian Journal of Linguistics 22(1): 5–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Moelders, Anne-Marie & Isabelle Buchstaller
2025. Learning to be (un)hip in panel data. Diachronica DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Saipanese English [Varieties of English Around the World, G69], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue