Cover not available

In:The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and beyond
Edited by Sarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber and Alexander Kautzsch
[Varieties of English Around the World G49] 2014
► pp. 448–469

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Lexical creativity reconsidered

GUI, cyborg, cred, pay-per-view, techno and cyber-

Published online: 12 September 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g49.26fis
The present study complements and modifies Fischer (1998), who analyzed creative neologisms in the British newspaper The Guardian 1991–1996 and established a general model of lexical institutionalization. First, we will present and discuss relevant research in cognitive linguistics. Secondly, we will consider various corpus-based studies about neologisms published from the 1990s onwards, particularly about meaning cues and the life-cycle of neologisms. In an empirical part, we will then investigate novel coinages and constituents in the London Guardian from the 1980s until 2012, including the combining forms techno- and cyber-, whose productivity will be measured and compared as well. The findings allow a re-evaluation of the factors involved in the institutionalization process.
References (33)
Aitchison, J. 2012. Words in the Mind. An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aitchison, J. & Lewis, D. 1995. How to handle wimps: Incorporating new lexical items as an adult. Folia Linguistica 29(1–2): 7–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, H. 1993. On frequency, transparency and productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1992, G.E. Booij & J. van Marle (eds), 181–208. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, H. & Lieber, R. 1991. Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics 29(5): 801–843. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, L. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. 1985. Morphology. A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowie, C.S. 2006. Economical with the truth: Register categories and the functions of ‘-wise’ viewpoint adverbs in the British National Corpus. ICAME Journal 30: 5–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. 2002. The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, R. 1998. Lexical Change in Present-day English. A Corpus-based Study of the Motivation, Institutionalization, and Productivity of Creative Neologisms. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S.Th. 2009. Statistics for Linguistics with R. A Practical Introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jescheniak, J.D. 2002. Sprachproduktion. Der Zugriff auf das lexikale Gedächtnis beim Sprechen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemmer, S. 2003. Schemas and lexical blends. In Motivation in Language. Studies in Honor of Günter Radden, H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven & K.-U. Panther (eds), 69–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lampert, M. & Lampert, G. 2010. Word-formation or word formation? The formation of complex words in cognitive linguistics. In Cognitive Perspectives on Word Formation, A. Onysko & S. Michel (eds), 29–73. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LexisNexis. [URL] (15 October 2013).
Levelt, W.J.M. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary online. [URL] (15 October 2013).
Plag, I. 1999. Morphological Productivity. Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plag, I., Dalton-Puffer, Ch. & Baayen, R. 1999. Morphological productivity across speech and writing. English Language and Linguistics 3(2): 209–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Renouf, A. 2007. Tracing lexical productivity and creativity in the British media: The chavs and the chav-nots? In Lexical Creativity, Texts and Contexts [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 58], J. Munat (ed.), 61–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Defining neology to meet the needs of the translator: A corpus-based study. Neologica. Revue International de Néologie 6: 17–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. A finer definition of neology in English: The life-cycle of a word. In Corpus Perspectives on Patterns of Lexis [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 57], H. Hasselgård, J. Ebeling & S. Oksefjell Ebeling (eds), 177–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Renouf, A. & Bauer, L. 2000. Contextual clues to word-meaning. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 5(2): 231–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Säily, T. 2011. Variation in morphological productivity in the BNC: Sociolinguistic and methodological considerations. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7(1): 119–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, H.-J. 2008. New words in the mind: Concept-formation and entrenchment of neologisms. Anglia 126(1): 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. English Morphology and Word-formation. An Introduction. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schröder, A. 2011. On the Productivity of Verbal Prefixation in English. Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trips, C. 2009. Lexical Semantics and Diachronic Morphology. The Development of -hood, dom and -ship in the History of English. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ungerer, F. 1999. Iconicity in word-formation. In Form Miming Meaning [Iconicity in Language and Literature 1], M. Nänny & O. Fischer (eds), 307–324. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Arbitrarität, Ikonizität und Motivation. In Lexikologie / Lexicology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Natur und Struktur von Wörtern und Wortschätzen. / International Handbook on the Nature and Structure of Words and Vocabularies, Vol. 1, D.A. Cruse, F. Hundsnurscher, M. Job & P.R. Lutzeier (eds), 371–380. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Word-formation. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (eds), 650–675. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue