Cover not available

In:The Middle Voice in Baltic
Axel Holvoet
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 5] 2020
► pp. 235–242

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Bibliography

Published online: 8 May 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.5.refs
Online sources
CCLL – Corpus of the Contemporary Lithuanian Language, [URL]
lvTenTen14 – Latvian Internet Corpora, [URL]
LVK2018 – Līdzsvarotais mūsdienu latviešu valodas tekstu korpuss [Balanced Corpus of Contemporary Latvian], [URL]
LKŽ – Lietuvių kalbos žodynas [Dictionary of the Lithuanian Language], [URL]
LLVV – Latviešu literārās valodas vārdnīca [Dictionary of the Latvian Literary Language], [URL]
NKJP – National Corpus of Polish, [URL]
RNC – Russian National Corpus, [URL]
SłStp – Słownik staropolski [Old Polish Dictionary], Vols. 1–11, Polska Akademia Nauk, 1953–2002, [URL]
Text editions, oral folklore collections
Barons & Wissendorffs = Kr. Barons & H. Wissendorffs, Latwju dainas, Vols. 1–6, Jelgava-St Petersburg, 1894–1915.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bretke, Johannes, Lithuanian Bible, Pentateuch, ed. Friedemann Kluge, Jochen Dieter Range, Friedrich Scholze, Paderborn etc.: Ferdinand Schöningh, 1996; Prophetic Books and Apocryphs, ed. Stephan Kessler, 2013; New Testament, ed. Jochen Dieter Range & Friedrich Scholz, 1991.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chyliński’s Old Testament = Samuelio Boguslavo Chylinskio Biblija. Senasis Testamentas, Gina Kavaliūnaitė (ed). Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas, 2008.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chyliński’s New Testament = Samuelio Boguslavo Chylinskio Biblija. Naujasis Testamentas Viešpaties mūsų Jėzaus Kristaus, Gina Kavaliūnaitė (ed). Vilnius: Vilnius University, 2019.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daukša’s Catechism = Mikalojaus Daukšos 1595 metų Katekizmas, Vida Jakštienė & Jonas Palionis (eds), Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidykla, 1995.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glück’s Old Testament = Ta swehta Grahmata, [URL]
Glück’s New testament = Tas Jauns Testaments, [URL]
Latviešu pasakas = Latviešu pasakas un teikas [Latvian Fairy Tales and Legends, compiled by Pēteris Šmits], [URL]
Trautmann, Reinhold. 1910. Die altpreußischen Sprachdenkmale. Einleitung, Texte, Grammatik, Wörterbuch. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vaišnoras’ Margarita Theologica = Simono Vaišnoro 1600 metų Żemczuga Theologischka ir jos šaltiniai, Guido Michelini (ed), Vilnius: Baltos lankos, 1997.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
References
Ackema, Peter & Maaike Schoorlemmer. 1994. The middle construction and the syntax-semantics interface. Lingua 93.1, 59–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Middles. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax Vol. 3, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 131–203. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Edit Doron. 2012. The syntactic construction of two non-active voices: passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics 48.1, 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer. 2005. The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed), 187–211. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ambrazas, Vytautas. 1979. Lietuvių kalbos dalyvių istorinė sintaksė [Historical Syntax of Lithuanian Participles]. Vilnius: Mokslas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, ed. 2006. Lithuanian Grammar. 2nd edn. Vilnius: Baltos lankos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Cori. 2011. Case theory and case alternations: Evidence from Lithuanian. Baltic Linguistics 2, 9–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter. 2011. Aspect and actionality in Lithuanian on a typological background. In Langues baltiques, langues slaves, Daniel Petit, Claire le Feuvre & Henri Menantaud (eds), 61–92. Paris: Editions CNRS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter & Jurgis Pakerys. 2015. Lithuanian morphological causatives. A corpus-based study. In Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic, Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 39–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter. 2015. Areal’naja tipologija prefiksal’nogo perfektiva (na materiale jazykov Evropy i Kavkaza) [An Areal Typology of the Prefixal Perfective (On the Basis of the Languages of Europe and the Caucasus)]. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Babby, Leonard. 1975. A transformational analysis of transitive -sja verbs in Russian. Lingua 35.3–4, 297–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergmane, Anna et al. (eds). 1959. Mūsdienu latviešu literārās valodas gramatika. I. Fonētika un morfoloģija [Grammar of Contemporary Literary Latvian. I. Phonetics and Morphology]. Riga: Latvijas PSR Zinātņu akadēmijas izdevniecība.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bezzenberger, Adalbert. 1877. Beiträge zur Geschichte der litauischen Sprache auf Grund litauischer Texte des xvi. und des xvii. Jahrhunderts. Göttingen: Robert Peppmüller.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boranić, Dragutin. 1899. O refleksivnim glagolima u hrvatskom jeziku [On reflexive verbs in Croatian]. Rad Hrvatske akademije znanosti i umjetnosti 140, 131–244. Online version <[URL]> (22 January, 2020).
Brajerski, Tadeusz. 1979. O bezpodmiotowych zdaniach z orzeczeniami typu mieszkało się i mieszkało mi się [On impersonal clauses with predicates of the type mieszkało się and mieszkało mi się]. In Opuscula polono-slavica. Munera linguistica Stanislao Urbańczyk dedicata, Jan Safarewicz et al. (eds), 69–78. Wrocław: Ossolineum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Massachussets at Amherst. Published 1980 by Garland Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language, Winfred P. Lehmann (ed), 329–394. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Syntax and Morphology. 2nd edn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Sandra A. Thompson. 2007. Lexical nominalization. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description Vol. 3, Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Timothy Shopen (ed), 334–381. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooreman, Ann. 1994. A functional typology of antipassives. In Voice. Form and Function, Barbara A. Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 49–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2012. Verbs. Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danielewiczowa, Magdalena. 2017. Umarło mu się. O pewnym typie polskiej operacji z udziałem się [Umarło mu się. About a certain type of operation with się in Polish]. Slavia. Časopis pro slovanskou filologii 86.2–3, 208–218.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Knop, Sabine & Fabio Mollica. 2017. The family of German dative constructions. In Constructing Families of Constructions, Paula Pérez-Sobrino et al. (eds), 205–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dimitriadis, Alexis. 2004. Discontinuous reciprocals. Manuscript: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS. <[URL]> (22 Januari, 2020).
Dixon, R. M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55, 59–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. On the semantic content of the notion of ‘thematic role’. In Properties, Type and Meaning, vol. 2, Semantic Issues, Gennaro Chierchia, Barbara H. Partee & Raymond Turner (eds), 69–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faltz, Leonard M. 1977. Reflexivization. A Study in Universal Syntax. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fici [Fiči], Francesca. 2011. Ob odnoj modal’noj funkcii refleksivnyx konstrukcij [On a certain modal function of reflexive constructions]. In: Slovo i jazyk. Sbornik statej k vos’midesjatiletiju akademika Ju. D. Apresjana [Word and Language. For Academician Ju. D. Apresjan on the Occasion of His 80th Birthday], 645–652. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1970. The grammar of hitting and breaking. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 120–133. Waltham, MA: Ginn & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1999. Domains of point of view and coreferentiality. System interaction approach to the study of reflexives. In Reflexives. Forms and Functions, Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Curl (eds), 125–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garde, Paul. 1985. O tak nazyvaemyx “simpatičeskix” padežax v sovremennom russkom jazyke [On the so-called ‘sympathetic’ cases in Modern Russian]. Russian Linguistics 9.2–3, 181–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gāters, Alfrēds. 1993. Lettische Syntax. Die Dainas. Hrsg. von Hildegard Radtke. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gehrke, Berit. 2011. Stative passives and event kinds. In Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeuting 15, Ingo Reich, Eva Horch & Dennis Pauly (eds), 241–257. Saarbrücken: Saarland University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma. 1977. Dabartinės lietuvių kalbos konversiniai sangrąžiniai veiksmažodžiai [Converse reflexive verbs in modern Lithuanian]. Baltistica II priedas, 63–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. The Typology of Reflexives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Reciprocal and reflexive constructions in Lithuanian (with references to Latvian). In Reciprocal Constructions, Vladimir P. Nedjalkov et al. (eds), 633–672. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Passive Constructions in Lithuanian. Selected Works of Emma Geniušienė edited by Anna Kibort & Nijolė Maskaliūnienė. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gesenius, Wilhelm & Emil Kautzsch. 1909. Wilhelm Gesenius’ Hebräische Grammatik, völlig umgearbeitet von E. Kautzsch. 28th edn. Leipzig: Verlag von F. C. W. Vogel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gildersleeve, Basil L. 1900. Syntax of Classical Greek from Homer to Demosthenes. New York, NY: American Book Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gołąb, Zbigniew. 1968. The grammar of Slavic causatives. In American Contributions to the 6th International Congress of Slavists, Henry Kučera (ed), 71–94. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goto, Ksenija V. & Sergej S. Saj. 2009. Častotnye xarakteristiki klassov russkix refleksivnyx glagolov [Frequency characteristics of Russian reflexive verb classes]. In Korpusnye issledovanija po russkoj grammatike, Ksenija L. Kiseleva et al. (eds), 184–223. Moskva: Probel-2000.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1982. On the lexical representation of Romance reflexive clitics. In The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, Joan Bresnan (ed), 87–148. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude. 1974. Les pronoms logophoriques. Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris 69, 287–310.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halevy, Rivka. 2013. Reflexive. In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics vol. 3, Geoffrey Khan (ed), 340–345. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1990. The grammaticalization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14.1, 25–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity, Bernhard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. A frequentist explanation of some universals of reflexive marking. Linguistic Discovery 6.1, 40–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Thomas Müller-Bardey. 2004. Valency change. In Morphology: A Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation. Vol. 2. (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft), Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds), 1130–1145. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Susanne Michaelis. 2008. Leipzig fourmille de typologues – Genitive objects in comparison. In Case and Grammatical Relations. Studies in Honor of Bernard Comrie, Greville G. Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds), 149–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heaton, Raina. 2017. A Typology of Antipassives, with Special Reference to Mayan. PhD Thesis, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel. 2000. Reflexiva typu słowiańskiego w pewnej gwarze górnołotewskiej [Slavonic-type reflexives in a High Latvian dialect]. In Kontakty językowe polszczyzny na pograniczu wschodnim. Prace ofiarowane Profesorowi Januszowi Riegerowi [The Contacts of Polish in the Eastern Borderlands. Festschrift for Janusz Rieger], Ewa Wolnicz-Pawłowska & Wanda Szulowska (eds), 97–102. Warsaw: Semper.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Phasal and proximative complementation: Lithuanian baigti. Baltic Linguistics 5, 81–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Extended uses of causatives in Latvian. In Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic, Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 147–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Reflexive permissives and the middle voice. Baltic Linguistics 7, 9–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Antipassive reflexives in Latvian. Baltic Linguistics 8, 57–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. On the heterogeneity of deaccusative reflexives. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 72.3, 401–419.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel, Anna Daugavet, Birutė Spraunienė & Asta Laugalienė. 2019. The agentive construction in Baltic and Fennic. In Minor Grams in Baltic, Slavonic and Fennic = Baltic Linguistics 10, 195–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56.2, 251–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum, eds. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1935/1971. Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre. Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. In Roman Jakobson, Selected Writings II. Word and Language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakulienė, Audronė. 1968. Lietuvių kalbos pasyvo formavimasis ir sangrąžiniai veiksmažodžiai [Reflexives and the formation of the Lithuanian passive]. Baltistica 4.2, 211–220.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna. 2010. On the reflexive-antipassive polysemy: Typological convergence from unrelated languages. Berkeley Linguistics Society 36, 158–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. L’antipassif dans les langues accusatives. Thèse de doctorat en Sciences du Langage, Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janko-Trinickaja, Nadija A. 1962. Vozvratnye glagoly v sovremennom russkom jazyke [Reflexive Verbs in Contemporary Russian]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kavaliūnaitė, Gina. 2008. Introduction. In Samuelio Boguslavo Chylinskio Biblija. Senasis Testamentas, Gina Kavaliūnaitė (ed), lxxv–cxxvij. Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Matthew S. Dryer. 2007. Passive in the world’s languages. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 1: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed), 325–361. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzan. 1993. The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klaiman, Miriam H. 1991. Grammatical Voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2009. Anticausativization. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27, 77–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroeger, Paul. 2005. Analyzing Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid. 2011. Voice typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed), 368–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Middle and reflexive. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Syntax, Silvia Luraghi & Claudio Parodi (eds), 261–280. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1996. Sorry, I’m not myself today. The metaphor system for conceptualizing the self. In Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar, Guy Fauconnier & Eve Sweetser (eds), 91–123. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1.1, 5–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lekakou, Marika. 2006. A comparative view of the requirement for a adverbial modification in middles. In Demoting the Agent. Passive, Middle and Other Voice Phenomena, Benjamin Lyngfelt & Torgrim Solstad (eds), 167–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Letučij, Aleksandr B. 2016. Vozvratnost’ [Reflexivity]. In Materialy k korpusnoj grammatike russkogo jazyka. Glagol. Čast’ I [Materials for a Corpus Grammar of Russian. The Verb. Part I], Vladimir Plungian et al. (eds), 268–340. St Petersburg: Nestor-Istorija.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport-Hovav. 2005. Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, František. 1991. Reciprocals and depatientives in To’aba’ita. In Currents in Pacific Linguistics: Papers on Austronesian Languages and Ethnolinguistics in honour of George W. Grace. (Pacific Linguistics, C-117), Robert Blust (ed), 171–183. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Margulies, Alfons. 1924. Die Verba reflexiva in den slavischen Sprachen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marušič, Franc & Rok Žaucer. 2014. The Involuntary State/feel-like Construction: What aspect cannot do. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 22.2, 185–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maskuliūnienė, Nijolė. 1915. Morphological, syntactic, and semantic types of converse verbs in Lithuanian. In Contemporary Approaches to Baltic Linguistics, Peter Arkadiev, Axel Holvoet & Björn Wiemer (eds), 349–382. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melčuk, Igor’. 1993. The inflectional category of voice: Towards a more rigorous definition. In Causatives and Transitivity, Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 1–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miura, Hidematsu. 2008. Grammatical Relations, Reflexives and Pseudo-Raising in Japanese. PhD thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nau, Nicole. 2006. Out of Africa: Logophoric pronouns and reported discourse in Finnish and High Latvian dialects. Acta Linguistica Lithuanica 55, 55–87.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. A Short Grammar of Latgalian. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Morphological causatives in contemporary Latvian. In Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic, Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 99–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Argument realization in Latvian action nominal constructions. A corpus and text based investigation. In Argument Realization in Baltic, Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 461–521. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 2007. Complementation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description Vol. 2: Complex Structures, Timothy Shopen (ed), 52–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pakerys, Jurgis. 2016. On periphrastic causative constructions in Lithuanian and Latvian. In Argument Realization in Baltic, Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 336–367. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Periphrastic causative constructions in Baltic: An overview. Baltic Linguistics 9, 9–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paulauskienė, Aldona. 2001. Lietuvių kalbos kultūra [Correct Lithuanian Usage]. Kaunas: Technologija.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Payne, Doris L. & Immanuel Barshi (eds). 1999. External Possession. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria. 2005. Antipassive constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 438–441. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reuland, Eric & Jan Koster. 1991. Long-distance anaphora: An overview. In Long-Distance Anaphora, Jan Koster & Eric Reuland (eds), 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothstein, Susan. 2004. Structuring Events. A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sadler, Louisa & Andrew Spencer. 1998. Morphology and argument structure. In The Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Spencer & Arnold Zwicky (eds), 206–236. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Say, Sergej. 2005. Antipassive -sja verbs in Russian. In Morphology and Its Demarcations, Wolfgang U. Dressler et al. (eds), 253–275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1988. Introduction. In Passive and Voice, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed), 2–8. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 2013. Lexical Relatedness. A Paradigm-Based Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew & Marina Zaretskaya. 1998. Verb prefixation in Russian as lexical subordination. Linguistics 36.1, 1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stroik, Thomas. 2006. Arguments in middles. In Demoting the Agent. Passive, Middle and Other Voice Phenomena, Benjamin Lyngfelt & Torgrim Solstad (eds), 301–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toops, Gary H. 1987. Russian contextual causatives. Slavic and East European Journal 31.4, 595–611. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1988. Antipassives in Warrungu and other Australian languages. In Passive and Voice, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed), 595–649. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Wolde, Ellen. 2019. The Niphal as middle voice and its consequence for meaning. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 43.3, 453–478. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66.2, 143–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wackernagel, Jacob. 1920. Vorlesungen über Syntax mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Griechisch, Lateinisch und Deutsch. Erste Reihe. Basel: Emil Birkhauser.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard. 2015. Logophoricity in Eastern Vidzeme: The literary Latvian idiolect of Andrievs Niedra and Leivu Estonian. Baltic Linguistics 6, 141–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waldenfels, Ruprecht von. 2012. The Grammaticalization of ‘give’ + Infinitive. A Comparative Study of Russian, Polish and Czech. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn & Marta Grzybowska. 2015. Converse relations with the reflexive marker in Lithuanian and Polish. In Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic, Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 211–286. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1980. The Case for Surface Case. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilczewska, Krystyna. 1966. Czasowniki zwrotne we współczesnej polszczyźnie [Reflexive Verbs in Contemporary Polish]. Toruń: Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zuñiga, Fernando & Seppo Kittilä. 2019. Grammatical Voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue