Cover not available

In:Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 2] 2015
► pp. 99–146

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Morphological causatives in contemporary Latvian

Published online: 5 August 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.2.02nau
This paper investigates Latvian verbs with causative morphology and their relations to non-causative verbs. Causative morphology comprises vowel alternation and suffixation. The different techniques are largely synonymous, but differ in frequency and productivity. A major concern of this paper is to determine which kinds of base verbs have corresponding morphological causatives and how the argument structure of a causative verb can be linked to that of the base verb. The great majority of Latvian morphological causatives represent the causative prototype: they are systematically related to patientive intransitive verbs whose single argument corresponds to the direct object of the causative construction. Variations to this pattern are found with causatives based on intransitive verbs whose primary argument is an Agent, Experiencer, or Theme. Morphological causatives related to transitive base verbs are rare and predominantly used in monotransitive constructions. In general, causatives with all kind of bases tend to be used in the basic transitive construction of Latvian with one direct object in the accusative, and possibly peripheral arguments marked with the locative or a preposition.
References (35)
LAV = Latviešu–angļu vārdnīca, electronic dictionary based on Andris Veisbergs, ed., Jaunā latviešu–angļu vārdnīca, Riga 2001. Available at [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LVK 2013, balanced corpus of modern standard Latvian, containing 4.5 million running words. Available at [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ME = K. Mühlenbachs lettisch-deutsches Wörterbuch. Redigiert, ergänzt und fortgesetzt von J. Endzelin. 1923–1932. Riga: Lettisches Bildungsministerium. Digitalized version available at [URL].
Protokols1918 = Izraksts no Tautas padomes svinīgās sēdes protokola par Latvijas valsts pasludināšanu. [From the protocol of the proclamation of the Latvian Republic on 18 November 1918] Available at [URL]
Senie = Latviešu valodas seno tekstu corpus / Corpus of early written Latvian texts. Available at [URL].
Tīm = tīmeklis; corpus compiled from Latvian Internet resources, containing about 97 million running words. Available at [URL].
References
Aikhenvald, Aleksandra Yu. 2011. Causatives which do not cause: Non-valency-increasing effects of a valency-increasing derivation. In Language at Large. Essays on Syntax and Semantics, Alexandra Yu. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon, 86–142. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ceplīte, Brigita & Ceplītis, Laimdots. 1991. Latviešu valodas praktiskā gramatika [Practical Latvian Grammar]. Rīga: Zvaigzne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. 2000. A typology of causatives: Form, syntax, and meaning. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R.M.W. Dixon & Aleksandra Aikhenvald (eds), 30–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. & Aikhenvald, Aleksandra. 2000. Introduction. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R.M.W. Dixon & Aleksandra Aikhenvald (eds), 1–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Endzelin, J[an]. 1922. Lettische Grammatik. Riga: Kommissionsverlag A. Gulbis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative / causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity, Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 87–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Calude, Andreea, Spagnol, Michael, Narrog, Heiko & Bamyacı, Elif. 2014. Coding causal-noncausal verb alternations: a form-frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics 50 (3): 587–625. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56, 251–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo. 2009. Causative morphemes as non-valency increasing devices. Folia Linguistica 43, 67–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Transitivity typology . In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed), 346–367. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid I. 2001. Causatives. In Language Typology and Linguistic Universals. An International Handbook, Martin Haspelmath et al. (eds), vol. 1, 886–898. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MLLVG-I, 1959. = Mūsdienu latviešu literārās valodas grammatika. I Fonētika un morfoloģija. [Grammar of Contemporary Standard Latvian. Phonetics and Morphology]. Anna Bergmane et al. (eds). Rīga: Latvijas PSR Zinātņu akadēmijas izdevniecība.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nau, Nicole. 2001. Inflection vs. derivation: How split is Latvian morphology? Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54 (3): 253–278.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild. 2007. Prototypical transitivity. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. How transitive are ‘eat’ and ‘drink’ verbs? In The Linguistics of Eating and Drinking, John Newman (ed), 27–43. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nedyalkov, V.P. & G.G. Silnitsky. 1973. The typology of morphological and lexical causatives. In Trends in Soviet Theoretical Linguistics, Ferenc Kiefer (ed), 1–32. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, Peterson, David A. & Barnes, Jonathan. 2004. Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8 (2): 149–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ostrowski, Norbert. 2004. Latviešu valodas kausatīvi ar priedēkli -(d)ēt [Latvian causatives in -(d)ēt]. Baltu filoloģija 13 (2): 105–111.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed). 2002. The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Introduction. Some basic issues in the grammar of causation. In The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed), 1–22. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Pardeshi, Prashant. 2002. The causative continuum. In The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed), 85–126. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soida, Emilija. 2009. Vārddarināšana [Word Formation]. Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung. 2001. Linguistic Typology. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Review of Masayoshi Shibatani, ed. 2002. Functions of Language 13, 130–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stang, Christian S. 1966. Vergleichende Grammatik der baltischen Sprachen. Oslo etc.: Universitets- forlaget.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1985. Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics 21, 385–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J. 1997. Syntax. Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Creissels, Denis
2024. Transitivity, Valency, and Voice, DOI logo
Haspelmath, Martin
2016. Universals of causative and anticausative verb formation and the spontaneity scale. Lingua Posnaniensis 58:2 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau
2016. Introduction. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Nau, Nicole & Jurgis Pakerys
2016. Transitivity pairs in Baltic: between Finnic and Slavic. Lingua Posnaniensis 58:2 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Pakerys, Jurgis
2016. On periphrastic causative constructions in Lithuanian and Latvian. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 427 ff. DOI logo
Riaubienė, Benita
2016. Resultative secondary predicates in the Baltic languages. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 403 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. The Middle Voice in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 5], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue