In:Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 1] 2014
► pp. 301–361
On the non-canonical marking of the highest-ranking argument in Lithuanian and Icelandic
Steps toward a database
Published online: 16 May 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.1.08wie
https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.1.08wie
This paper is a first report on an ongoing project aiming at building up a database of non-canonical argument marking in Lithuanian in contrast to other languages with relatively rich systems of morphological cases. The language with which we begin the comparison is Icelandic. The overarching aim consists not only in a unified inventorisation of relevant units, but in disclosing (i) regularities in the alternation of coding patterns and (ii) the factors underlying such variation. We will concentrate on case marking; this however implies agreement patterns as well, insofar as in these two languages only nominatival NPs trigger agreement on the finite verb (= predicate of the clause). We further concentrate on verbs with non-canonical marking of their highest-ranking argument (HRA); the notion of HRA is defined on the basis of the Actor-Undergoer
Hierarchy as developed in Role & Reference Grammar (see 2.1). What we present here is not yet a comprehensive description of the whole body of data, but rather a problem paper which details some conceptual issues and highlights some prominent types of argument coding and their relation to lexical groups.
References (70)
Jónsson, Jóhannes G. 1998.
A list of Predicates that Take a Quirky Subject in Icelandic
, Ms. University of Iceland.
Dabartinės Lietuvių Kalbos Žodynas DLKŽ
(2000)
Lietuvių kalbos tekstynas
, [URL]
LKŽ – Lietuvių kalbos žodynas
, 20 vol., Vilnius
LKŽe – Lietuvių kalbos žodynas
, electronic variant, [URL]
Sližienė, Nijolė. 2004.
Lietuvių kalbos veiksmažodžių junglumo žodynas
vols. 1–3. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos institutas.
References
Anderson, Cori. Forthcoming. Non-canonical case patterns in Lithuanian. In
Contemporary Approaches to Baltic Linguistics
, Peter M. Arkadiev, Axel Holvoet, and Björn Wiemer (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Andrews, Avery. 1976. The VP complement analysis in Modern Icelandic.
North Eastern Linguistic Society
6: 1–21.
1982. The Representation of Case in Modern Icelandic. In
The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations
, Joan Bresnan (ed.), 427–503. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21995 [1974].
Leksičeskaja semantika (sinonimičeskie sredstva jazyka)
. Moskva: Škola “Jazyki russkoj kul’tury”.
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2001.
Case in Icelandic – A synchronic, diachronic and comparative approach
. Lund University dissertation. [Published as
Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap
A57, Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages, 2001.]
. 2004. The semantics of the impersonal construction in Icelandic, German and Faroese: beyond thematic roles. In
Focus on Germanic Typology
. Werner Abraham (ed), 101–130. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
. 2006. Construction-specific properties of syntactic subjects in Icelandic and German.
Cognitive Linguistics
17(1), 19–106.
. 2008.
Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic
. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Butt, Miriam. 2009. Modern approaches to case: an overview. In
The Oxford Handbook of Case
, Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer (eds), 27–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cennamo, Michela, Eythórsson, Thórhallur and Barðdal, Jóhanna. Forthcoming.
The Rise and Fall of Anticausative Constructions in Indo-European: The context of Latin and Germanic
. Submitted to a thematic volume of Linguistics
.
Croft, W. 1998. Event Structure in Argument Linking. In
The Projection of Arguments. Lexical and Compositional Factors
, Miriam Butt and Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 21–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Dahl, Östen. 1985.
Case Grammar and Prototypes
. Duisburg: Linguistic Agency, University of Duisburg, Series A 146.
Dixon, Richard M. W. 1991.
A New Approach to English Grammar, on Semantic Principles
. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2000a. Dative vs. nominative: changes in quirky subjects in Icelandic.
Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics
8: 27–44.
. 2002. Changes in subject case marking in Icelandic. In
Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change
, David Lightfoot (ed), 196–212. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
and Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2005. Oblique subjects: A common Germanic inheritance!
Language
81(4): 824–881.
Friðriksson, Finnur. 2008.
Language Change vs. Stability in Conservative Language Communities: A Case Study of Icelandic
. PhD Dissertation, Gothenburg University.
Halldórsson, Halldór. 1982. Um méranir: Drög að samtímalegri og sögulegri athugun [About dativizings: preliminaries to a synchronic and diachronic investigation].
Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði
4: 159–189.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. External Possession in a European areal perspective. In
External possession
Typological Studies in Language 39], Doris L. Payne and Immanuel Barshi (eds), 109–135. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2001. Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. In
Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects
[Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Richard M. W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds.), 53–83. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins,.
. 2011. On S, A, P, T and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology.
Linguistic Typology
15: 535–567.
Hopper, Paul J. and Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse.
Language
56, 251–95.
Jónsson, Jóhannes G. 1996.
Clausal Architecture and Case in Icelandic
. Amherst: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
2003. Not so quirky: on subject case in Icelandic. In
New Perspectives on Case and Case Theory
, Ellen Brandner and Heike Zinsmeister (eds), 127–164. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
and Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2005. Variation in subject case marking in Insular Scandinavian.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics
28 (2): 223–245.
Keenan, Edward. 1976. Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. In
Subject and Topic
, Charles N. Li (ed.), 303–333. New York etc.: Academic Press.
König, Ekkehard. 2001. Internal and external possessors. In
Language Typology and Language Universals
, Martin Haspelmath et al.. (eds), vol. 2, 970–978. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
Lenartaitė, Kristina. 2011.
Argumentų raiškos alternavimas lietuvių kalboje
[Alternations in Argument Realization in Lithuanian]. Unpublished PhD thesis, Vilnius.
Levin, Beth. 1993.
English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation
. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Malchukov, Andrej and Narrog, Heiko. 2009. Case polysemy. In
The Oxford Handbook of Case
, Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer (eds), 518–534. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maling, Joan. 2002. Það rignir þágufalli á Íslandi [Verbs with dative objects in Icelandic].
Íslenskt mál
24: 31–105.
Minger, David L. 2002.
An Analysis of Grammatical Relations and Case Marking in Icelandic
. MA Thesis, University of California, Davis.
Narrog, Heiko. 2009. Varieties of instrumental. In
The Oxford Handbook of Case
, Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer (eds), 593–600. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Onishi, Masayuki. 2001. Introduction: Non-canonically marked subjects and objects: Parameters and properties. In
Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects
[Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Richard M. W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 1–51. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ottosson, Kjartan. 2009.
The Anticausative and Related Categories in the Old Germanic Languages
. Ms. University of Oslo.
Payne, Doris and Barshi, Immanuel. 1999.
External Possession
[Typological Studies in Language 39]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Primus, Beatrice. 2009. Case, grammatical relations, and semantic roles. In
The Oxford Handbook of Case
, Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer (eds), 261–275. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1983. Þágufallssýkin og fallakerfi í íslensku [Dative sickness and the case system in Icelandic].
Skíma
16: 3–6.
Saj, Sergej S. 2011. Nekanoničeskoe markirovanie aktantov mnogomestnyx predikatov: opyt kvantitativno-tipologičeskogo issledovanija.
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana
, vol. vii, part 3, Nikolaj N. Kazanskij (ed), 424–430. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka.
Forthcoming. Bivalent verb classes in the languages of Europe: A quantitative typological study. Submitted to
Language Dynamics and Change
.
Seefranz-Montag, Ariane von. 1983.
Syntaktische Funktionen und Wortstellungsveränderung. Die Entwicklung „Subjektloser” Konstruktionen in einigen Sprachen
. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.
Seržant, Ilja. A. 2013a. Rise of canonical objecthood with the Lithuanian verbs of pain.
Baltic Linguistics
4: 187–211.
Seržant, Ilja A. 2013b. The diachronic typology of non-canonical subjects and subject-like obliques. In
The Diachronic Typology of Non-canonical Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series 140]
, Ilja A. Seržant and Leonid Kulikov (eds), 313–360. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. John Benjamins.
Sigurðsson, Halldór Á. 1989.
Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic
. Lund: Lund University dissertation. [Published: Reykjavík: Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, 1992.]
Smith, Michel B. 2001. Why quirky case really isn’t quirky (Or how to treat dative sickness in Icelandic). In
Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics
, Hubert Cuyckens and Britta E. Zawada, (eds), 115–159. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Svavarsdóttir, Ásta. 1982. ‘Þágufallssýki [‘Dative Sickness’]’.
Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði
4: 19–62.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur 1979.
On Complementation in Icelandic
. Harvard University dissertation, Cambridge, MA [Published: New York: Garland, 1979.]
Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1991. Another look at Icelandic case marking and grammatical relations.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
9: 145–194.
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2005.
Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface
. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge U.P.
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. & LaPolla, Randy. 1997.
Syntax. Structure, meaning and function
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Viberg, Åke. 1984. The verbs of perception: A typological study.
Explanations for Language Universals
, Brian Butterworth, Bernard Comrie, and Östen Dahl (eds), 123–162. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wiemer, Björn. 2013. Značimost’ sposobov modifikacii glagol’nyx osnov dlja ocenki areal’noj differenciacii baltijskix jazykov (po sravneniju s rjadom slavjanskix mikrojazykov). In
Tipologija slavjanskix, baltijskix i balkanskix jazykov (v svete jazykovyx kontaktov)
, Vjačeslav Vs. Ivanov and & Petr M. Arkad’ev (eds), 220–246. Sankt-Peterburg: Aletejja.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Malchukov, Andrej
2018. Forty years in the search of a/the subject. In Non-canonically case-marked subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series, 200], ► pp. 241 ff.
Holvoet, Axel
2016. Argument marking in Baltic and Slavonic pain-verb constructions. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 83 ff.
Seržant, Ilja A.
2016. The nominative case in Baltic in a typological perspective. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 137 ff.
Wiemer, Björn & Vaiva Žeimantienė
2016. Contexts for the choice of genitive vs. instrumental in contemporary Lithuanian. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 259 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
