Cover not available

In:Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 1] 2014
► pp. 207–255

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Differential object marking in Latgalian

 | Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan | Vilnius University
Published online: 16 May 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.1.06nau
This article discusses variation in object marking in Latgalian, based on sources where this phenomenon is most pronounced. Differential object marking in Latgalian consists in the choice of the genitive instead of the accusative for objects of transitive verbs. Genitive marking regularly appears in negated clauses and in constructions with the supine. It is optionally used in clauses that portray a situation as unreal, unlikely, or undesired from the point of view of the speaker. Apart from these clause-related factors, genitive marking is common though less regular with mass nouns and count nouns in the plural in descriptions of single events, while for habitually occurring events the accusative is used. The use of the partitive genitive is increasingly coupled with prefixing of the verb. A further type is the use of the genitive with cumulative verbs. There is also a small group of non-derived verbs that select the genitive. Those that have a nominative subject tend to become transitive verbs in modern written Latgalian.
References (34)
Sources
Ādama stāsts. Mazsalaciešu dzīve, ieradumi un tikumi Ā. Purmaļa autobiogrāfijā 19. un 20. gs. mijā . 2008. Ed. Sanita Reinsone. Rīga: Zinātne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
IS = texts from Ilze Sperga’s blog at [URL]
KS = Kur sauleitei sāta , short story by Ilze Sperga published 2008 on her former web-site at [URL]
Mar = Marabeju kolns , short story by Ilze Sperga, published 2011 on her web-site at [URL]
Miljons-1.0 = corpus of contemporary Latvian, 1 million words. Access through [URL] [accessed in August 2013]
Miljons-2.0 = corpus of contemporary Latvian, 3.5 million words. Access through [URL] [accessed April-August 2013]]
MuLa-1.0 = corpus of contemporary written Latgalian, 1 million words. Access through [URL] [accessed April-August 2013]
UP = Ulanowska, Stefania. 1895. Łotysze Inflant polskich, a w szczególności gminy Wielońskiej, powiatu Rzeżyckiego. Obraz etnograficzny. Część III. Zbiór wiadomości do antropologii krajowej , t. XVIII, 232–406.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
VL = texts written by Valentins Lukaševičs, published in a Latvian newspaper ( Latvijas Avīze ) and on the Internet, available at the portal [URL]
References
Bossong, Georg. 1991. Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In New analyses in Romance linguistics, Dieter Wanner & Douglas A. Kibbee (eds), 143–170. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bukšs, Miķelis & Placinskis, Jurs. 1973. Latgaļu volūdas gramatika un pareizraksteibas vōrdneica [Latgalian Grammar and orthographic dictionary]. 2nd edn. München: Latgalischer Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cibuļs, Jurs & Leikuma, Lidija. 2003. Vasals! Latgaliešu valodas mācība . Rīga: n.i.m.s.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Hoop, Helen & Malchukov, Andrej L. 2008. Case marking strategies. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 565–587. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Endzelin, Jan. 1922. Lettische Grammatik . Riga: Kommisionsverlag A. Gulbis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filip, Hana. 2005. On accumulating and having it all. Perfectivity, prefixes and bare arguments. In Perspectives on aspect, Henk J. Verkuyl, Henriëtte de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds), 125–148. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gāters, Alfrēds. 1977. Die lettische Sprache und ihre Dialekte . The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2001. Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. In Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects [Typological Studies in Languages 46], Alexandra Aikhenvald, R.M.W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 56–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15: 535–567. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kagan, Olga. 2010. Genitive objects, existence and individuation. Russian Linguistics 34: 17–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Semantics of genitive objects in Russian . Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leikuma, Lidija. 2010. Par dažiem Latgales latviešu folkloras pieraksta jautājumiem: Lettische Volkslieder (1869). Baltu Filoloģija 19: 53–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindāne, Irma. 1986. Dignājas izloksne . Rīga: Zinātne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L. 2005. Case pattern splits, verb types and construction competition. In Competition and variation in natural languages: The case for case, Mengistu Amber & Helen de Hoop (eds), 73–117. London: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nau, Nicole. 2011a. A short grammar of Latgalian . München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. Declension classes in Latvian and Latgalian: Morphomics vs. Morphophonology. Baltic Linguistics 2: 141–177.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild. 2007. Prototypical transitivity [Typological Studies in Languages 72]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 2007. Complementation. In Language typology and syntactic description. Volume II: Complex constructions, Timothy Shopen (ed), 52–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Onishi, Masayuki. 2001. Introduction: Non-canonically marked subjects and objects: Parameters and Properties. In Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects [Typological Studies in Languages 46], Alexandra Aikhenvald, R.M.W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 1–51. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinnemäki, Kaius. 2012ms. A typological perspective to differential object marking. Manuscript, version 24 Aug. 2012. [URL] (02 March 2013).
Strods, Pīters. 1933. Pareizraksteibas vōrdneica . Rēzekne [published by the author].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1985. Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics 21: 385–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ūsele, Veneranda. 1998. Tilžas izloksnes apraksts . Rīga: Latviešu valodas institūts.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Grünthal, Riho
2025. 712 Inherited features, grammatical change, and the influence of early language contacts in Finnic. In Convergence and Divergence in the Eastern Circum-Baltic Area, ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Peter, Arkadiev & Kozhanov Kirill
2025. 5137 Object partitive of negation: An areal perspective. In Convergence and Divergence in the Eastern Circum-Baltic Area, ► pp. 513 ff. DOI logo
Seržant, Ilja A.
2021. Typology of partitives. Linguistics 59:4 ► pp. 881 ff. DOI logo
Arkadiev, Peter M.
2016. Long-distance Genitive of Negation in Lithuanian. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau
2016. Introduction. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue