Cover not available

In:Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 1] 2014
► pp. 1–41

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Argument marking and grammatical relations in Baltic

An overview

 | University of Warsaw | Vilnius University
 | Vilnius University | Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
Published online: 16 May 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.1.01hol
References (74)
Sources
LiLa = Lietuviešu-latviešu-lietuviešu paralēlo tekstu korpuss. Availabe online at: [URL]
LLVV = Latviešu literārās valodas vārdnīca . 7.2 S-T, 1991. Rāga: Zinātne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mio-2 = miljons-2.0, corpus of contemporary standard Latvian. Available online at: [URL].
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., Robert M. W. Dixon, and Masayuki Onishi (eds). 2001. Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aleksandravičiūtė, Skaistė. 2013. The semantic effects of the Subject Genitive of Negation in Lithuanian. Baltic Linguistics 4: 9–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ambrazas, Vytautas (ed). 1997. Lithuanian Grammar . Vilnius: Baltos lankos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ambrazas V. 2001. On the development of nominative object in East Baltic. In Circum-Baltic Languages , vol. 2: Grammar and Typology [Studies in Language Companion Series 55], Östen Dahl and Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), 391–412. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery D. 2001. Non-canonical A/S marking in Icelandic. In: Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert M. W. Dixon, and Masayuki Onishi (eds), 85–111. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andronov, Aleksey V. 2001. A survey of the case paradigm in Latvian. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54(3): 197–208.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter M. 2013. Marking of subjects and objects in Lithuanian non-finite clauses: A typological and diachronic perspective. Linguistic Typology 17(3): 397–437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2003. ‘Oblique Subjects’ in Icelandic and German. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 70: 61–99. Available at: [URL]
Bayer, Josef. 2004. Non-nominative subjects in comparison. In Non-nominative subjects , vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 49–76. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berg-Olsen, Sturla. 1999. A syntactic change in progress: The decline in the use of the non-prepositional genitive in Latvian, with a comparative view on Lithuanian . MA thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. The Latvian non-prepositional genitive – a case losing ground. Res Balticae 6, 95–146.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Subjects and valency-changing mechanisms in Latvian. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54(3): 200–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. The Latvian dative and genitive: A Cognitive Grammar account . PhD thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2004. The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas. In Non-nominative subjects , vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao& Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 77–112. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Grammatical relations typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Language Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed), 399–444. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols. 2011. Case marking and alignment. In The Oxford handbook of case , Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 304–321. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borschev, Vladimir, Paducheva, Elena V., Partee, Barbara H., Testelets, Yakov, and Yanovich, Igor. 2008. Russian genitives, non-referentiality, and the property-type hypothesis. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Stony Brook Meeting 2007 [Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistcs 16], A. Antonenko, J. F. Bailyn & C. Bethin (eds), 48–67. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstan, Marina Chumakina and Greville G. Corbett (eds) 2013. Canonical Morphology and Syntax . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1975. The antiergative: Finland’s answer to Basque. Chicago Linguistic Society 11: 112–121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1986. The use of the genitive or accusative for the direct object of negated verbs in Russian: A bibliography. In Case in Slavic , Richard D. Brecht & James S. Levine (eds), 361–372. Columbus, Ohio: Slavica Publishers Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark. 2008. Semantic alignment systems: what’s what, and what’s not. In The typology of semantic alignment , Mark Donohue and Søren Wichmann (eds), 24–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark & Wichmann, Søren (eds). 2008. The Typology of Semantic Alignment . Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Endzelin, J[an]. 1922. Lettische Grammatik . Riga: Kommisionsverlag A. Gulbis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Endzelīns, Jānis & Kārlis Mǖlenbachs. 1907. Latviešu gramatika . Rīga: K. J. Zichmanis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filip, Hana. 2001. Nominal and verbal semantic structure: analogies and interactions. Language Sciences 23: 453–501. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. On accumulating and having it all. Perfectivity, prefixes and bare arguments. In Perspectives on aspect , H. J. Verkuyl, H. de Swart & A. van Hout (eds), 125–148. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franks, Stephen and Lavine, James E. 2006. Case and word order in Lithuanian. Journal of Linguistics 42(1): 239–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2001. Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. In Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Richard M.W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 53–83. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86(3): 663–687. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15: 535–567. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel. 1992. Bemerkungen über die Entwicklung des lettischen Kasussystems: Der Instrumental. In Colloquium Pruthenicum Primum. Papers from the First International Conference on Old Priussian , Wojciech Smoczyński and Axel Holvoet (eds), 143–149. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Between morphosyntax and the paradigm: Some puzzling patterns of case distribution in Baltic and their implications. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 42(2): 175–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Obliqueness, quasi-subjects and transitivity in Baltic and Slavonic. In The Diachronic Typology of Non-Canonical Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series 140], Ilja A. Seržant & Leonid Kulikov (eds), 259–284. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. Non-canonical subjects in Latvian: an obliqueness-based approach. In Contemporary Approaches to Baltic Linguistics , Peter M. Arkadiev, Björn Wiemer, Axel Holvoet (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Hopper, Paul and Thompson, Sandra. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huumo, Tuomas. 2009. Fictive dynamicity, nominal aspect, and the Finnish copulative construction. Cognitive Linguistics 20(1), 43–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kagan, Olga. 2010. Genitive objects, existence and individuation. Russian Linguistics 34: 17–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Semantics of genitive objects in Russian . Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1976. Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. Subject and Topic , Charles N. Li (ed.), 303–333. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1998. Partitive case and aspect. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors , Miriam Butt and Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 265–307. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria and Wälchli, Bernhard. 2001. The Circum-Baltic languages. An areal-typological approach. In Circum-Baltic Languages , vol. 2: Grammar and Typology [Studies in Language Companion Series 55 ], Östen Dahl and Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), 615–750. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lavrin, B. A.1963. Ob odnoj slavjano-balto-finskoj izoglosse. Lietuvių kabotyros klausimai 6: 87–107.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2005. Argument Realization . Cambridge: Cambridge Univerity Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L. 2005. Case pattern splits, verb types and construction competition. In Competition and Variation in Natural Languages: The Case for Case , Mengistu Amberber & Helen de Hoop (eds), 73–117. London: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej.2006. Transitivity parameters and transitivity alternations: Constraining co-variation. In Case, Valency and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 77], Leonid. I. Kulikov, Andrej L. Malchukov, Helen de Hoop (eds), 329–357. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mīlenbahs, Kārlis. 2009 [1890/1891]. Par akuzatīvu un ģenitīvu pie noliegtiem tranzitīviem verbiem. In Kārlis Mīlenbahs. Darbu izlase divos sējumos . 1. sējums, 42–49. Rīga: LU Latviešu valodas institūts.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, John and Perlmutter, David M. 2000 What does it take to be a Dative Subject? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 373–416. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mühlenbach, Karl. 1902/3. Über die vermeintlichen Genitive oder Ablative auf -ů oder u im Lettischen. Indogermanische Forschungen 13: 220–260.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild. 2007. Prototypical Transitivity [Typological Studies in Language 72]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Varieties of dative. In The Oxford Handbook of Case , Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 572–580. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nau, Nicole. 1998. Latvian [Languages of the World/Materials 217]. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. Declension classes in Latvian and Latgalian: Morphomics vs. Morphophonology. Baltic Linguistics 2: 141–177.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 2008. Why are stative-active languages rare in Eurasia? A typological perspective on split-subject marking. In The typology of semantic alignment , Mark Donohue and Søren Wichmann (eds), 121–139. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Onishi, Masayuki. 2001. Introduction: Non-canonically marked subjects and objects. Parameters and properties. In Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert M. W. Dixon, and Masayuki Onishi (eds), 1–51. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara H., Borschev, Vladimir, Paducheva, Elena V., Testelets, Yakov, and Yanovich, Igor. 2011. Russian Genitive of Negation Alternations: The Role of Verb Semantics. Scando-Slavica 57(2): 135–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. The role of verb semantics in genitive alternations: genitive of negation and genitive of intensionality. In The Russian Verb [Oslo Studies in Language 4(1)], Atle Grønn & Anna Pazelskaya (eds), 1–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perkova, NataliaMS. Non-canonical argument marking in two-place predication: the case of the Baltic languages. Unpublished paper, Stockholm 2013.
Piccini, Silvia. 2008. Traces of non-nominative alignment in Lithuanian: the impersonal constructions in Indo-European perspective. Baltistica 43(3): 437–461.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Primus, Beatrice. 2011. Case, grammatical relations, and semantic roles. In The Oxford Handbook of Case , Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer (eds), 261–275. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raģe, S. 1964. Erģemes, Lugazu un Valkas izloksnes fonētika un morfoloģija. Valodas un literatūras institūta raksti 8: 5–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seržant, Ilja. 2013a. Rise of canonical objecthood with the Lithuanian verbs of pain. Baltic Linguistics 4: 187–211.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. Rise of Canonical Subjecthood. In The Diachrony of Non-canonical Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series 140], Ilja A. Seržant and Leonid Kulikov (eds), 309–336. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. forthcoming. Dative experiencer constructions as a Circum-Baltic isogloss. In Contemporary Approaches to Baltic Linguistics , Peter M. Arkadiev, Björn Wiemer, Axel Holvoet (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Seržant, Ilja A., Fedriani, Chiara, and Kulikov, Leonid. 2013. Introduction. In The Diachrony of Non-canonical Subjects , Ilja A. Seržant, and Leonid Kulikov (eds) [Studies in Language Companion Series 140], ix–xxvi. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Á. 2004. Icelandic non-nominative subjects: facts and implications. In Non-Nominative Subjects , Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri V. Subbarao (eds), vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Languages 61], 137–159. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Timberlake, Alan. 1974. The Nominative Object in Slavic, Baltic, and West Finnic . München: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1981. Split case-marking in verb types and tense/aspect/mood. Linguistics 19: 389–438.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1985. Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics 21: 385–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verma, Manindra & K[aravannur]. P.[uthanvettil] Mohanan. 1990. Introduction to the experiencer subject construction, 1–11.
(eds). 1990. Experiencer subjects in South Asian languages . Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Maling, Joan and Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1985. Case and grammatical functions: the Icelandic passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 441–483. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Grünthal, Riho
2025. 712 Inherited features, grammatical change, and the influence of early language contacts in Finnic. In Convergence and Divergence in the Eastern Circum-Baltic Area, ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Peter, Arkadiev & Kozhanov Kirill
2025. 5137 Object partitive of negation: An areal perspective. In Convergence and Divergence in the Eastern Circum-Baltic Area, ► pp. 513 ff. DOI logo
Luraghi, Silvia, Merlijn De Smit & Iván Igartua
2020. Contact-induced change in the languages of Europe: The rise and development of partitive cases and determiners in Finnic and Basque. Linguistics 58:3 ► pp. 869 ff. DOI logo
Li, Yanzhi & Yicheng Wu
2018. The constructionalization and constructional change of noncanonical V-NP expressions in Mandarin Chinese. Studies in Language 42:4 ► pp. 886 ff. DOI logo
Zakrzewska, Ewa D.
2017. Complex verbs in Bohairic Coptic. In Argument Realisation in Complex Predicates and Complex Events [Studies in Language Companion Series, 180], ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Arkadiev, Peter M.
2016. Long-distance Genitive of Negation in Lithuanian. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau
2016. Introduction. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Lavine, James E.
2016. Variable argument realization in Lithuanian impersonals. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Nau, Nicole
2016. Argument realization in Latvian action nominal constructions. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 461 ff. DOI logo
Seržant, Ilja A.
2016. The nominative case in Baltic in a typological perspective. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Nau, Nicole & Axel Holvoet
2015. Voice in Baltic. In Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 2], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue