Get fulltext from our e-platform
Knowledge and Commitment
A problem-oriented approach to literary studies
The authors present a new perspective on a wide range of issues in the study of literature and culture. Some of the topics discussed, such as interpretation, canon formation, and literary historiography, belong to the traditional domain of literary studies. Others — cultural identity, convention, systems theory, and empirical methods — originate in the social sciences and are now being integrated into the humanities. By referring to the work of authors as widely apart as Hayden White, Edward Said, Fredric Jameson, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, Reinhart Koselleck, Pierre Bourdieu, Niklas Luhmann, Siegfried Schmidt, Norbert Groeben, and many others, the full complexity of the field of literary studies becomes apparent.
The authors argue for a distinction between analysis of literary systems on the one hand and critical intervention on the other. By distinguishing between research and criticism, between knowledge and commitment, they offer new ways for literary studies as well as for cultural critique.
[Utrecht Publications in General and Comparative Literature, 33] 2000. x, 217 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 21 October 2008
Published online on 21 October 2008
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
- Acknowledgements | pp. vii–viii
- Preface | pp. ix–x
- 1. Introduction | pp. 1–12
- 2. Interpretation and Explanation | pp. 13–26
- 3. Canons: Critical and Didactic Instruments | pp. 27–46
- 4. Literary History | pp. 47–86
- 5. Identity and Convention | pp. 87–112
- 6. Literary Systems | pp. 113–124
- 7. Empirical Research | pp. 125–168
- 8. Intervention in the Cultural Debate | pp. 169–188
- 9. Conclusions | pp. 189–192
- Name Index | pp. 207–212
- Subject Index | pp. 213–217
“Knowledge and Commitment is a sober and learned book, wide-ranging and sympathetic by way of its pragmatism and exemplification, its valuation of the multi-facetted uses of literature, its belief in understanding across cultures, its view of cultures as hybrid, and not least as an interesting attempt to position and promote research as opposed to hermeneutics, criticism, and rhetoric.”
Mads Rosendahl Thomsen, University of Aarhus
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Tseronis, Assimakis & Charles Forceville
2017. Argumentation and rhetoric in visual and multimodal communication. In Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres [Argumentation in Context, 14], ► pp. 1 ff.
Fokkema, Douwe
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.