Cover not available

Article published In: Between specialised texts and institutional contexts – competence and choice in legal translation
Edited by Valérie Dullion
[Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 3:1] 2017
► pp. 81–96

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Calling translation to the bar

A comparative analysis of the translation errors made by translators and lawyers

 | University of Trieste
Published online: 1 June 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ttmc.3.1.06orl
Abstract
This paper proposes a comparative analysis of the translation errors made by prospective legal translation trainees, with a special focus on the (mis)use of legal terminology and phraseology. The investigation relies on the data produced and collected within a wider empirical study on the translation problems faced by a cohort of translation graduates with no specialisation in legal translation on the one hand, and a cohort of linguistically-skilled lawyers with no translation-related qualifications on the other, who translated the same criminal law document from English into Italian. The translation errors made by the two cohorts have been classified on the basis of the categories proposed by . 2014. Revising and Editing for Translators. Oxon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar and assessed following the severity scale devised by Vollmar, Gabriele. 2001. “Damit die Qualität nicht in der Übersetzungsflut untergeht: Ein Modell für eine pragmatische Qualitätssicherung bei Übersetzungsprojekten.” Lebende Sprachen 46 (1): 2–6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar. The Translation Quality Index (cf. Schiaffino, Riccardo, and Franco Zearo. 2006. “Developing and Using a Translation Quality Index.” Multilingual (81): 53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar) thus obtained has allowed for the ranking of the participants in the five quality levels identified for legal translation by . 2014. “Parameters for Problem-Solving in Legal Translation: Implications for Legal Lexicography and Institutional Terminology Management.” In The Ashgate Handbook of Legal Translation, ed. by Le Cheng, King Kui Sin, and Anne Wagner, 121–134. Farhnam: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar. The findings of the quantitative and qualitative analyses of errors are also traced back to the participants’ translation process by triangulating data from the different collection methods used within the empirical study, i.e. screen recording, keystroke logging and questionnaires, with particular reference to time and reference material use. The specific design of this investigation, which considers the participants’ prior education as additional variable, allows for the identification of a possible correlation between the different backgrounds of the translators and the quality of their translations, with general consequences on the conceptualisation of legal translation competence and effective training.
Article outline
  • 1.Who is the competent legal translator?
  • 2.The empirical study
  • 3.TQA through error analysis
    • 3.1Methodological background
    • 3.2Results
    • 3.3Triangulation of quality and process-based data
      • 3.3.1Delivery time, pausing ratio and translation quality
      • 3.3.2Translation phases and translation quality
      • 3.3.3Consultations and severity of errors
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (56)
References
Alves, Fábio. 1997. “A formação de tradutores a partir de uma abordagem cognitiva: reflexões de um projeto de ensino.” TradTerm 4 (2): 19–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “A Relevance-Theoretic Approach to Effort and Effect in Translation: Discussing the Cognitive Interface between Inferential Processing, Problem-Solving and Decision-Making.” In Proceedings of the International Symposium on New Horizons in Theoretical Translation Studies, 1–12. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brunette, Louise, Chantal Gagnon, and Jonathan Hine. 2005. “The GREVIS Project: Revise or Court Calamity.” Across Languages and Cultures 6 (1): 29–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cao, Deborah. 2007. Translating Law. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew, and Emma Wagner. 2002. Can Theory Help Translators?: A Dialogue Between the Ivory Tower and the Wordface. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colina, Sonia. 1997. “Teaching Translation to Undergraduates: What Errors Reveal.” Translatio XVI (3): 245–256.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
EMT Expert Group. 2009. “Competences for Professional Translators, Experts in Multilingual and Multimedia Communication.” Accessed September 5, 2016. [URL]
Enríquez Raído, Vanessa. 2011. “Investigating the Web Search Behaviors of Translation Students: An Exploratory and Multiple-Case Study.” PhD Thesis. Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Translation and Web Searching. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faber, Dorrit, and Mette Hjort-Pedersen. 2009. “Translation Preferences in Legal Translation: Lawyers and Professional Translators Compared.” Copenhagen Studies in Language (38): 339–358.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández Rodríguez, Áurea. 2015. “La competencia documental en el aprendizaje de la traducción económica francés-español-francés. Estudio de caso.” inTRAlinea (Special Issue: New Insights into Specialised Translation). [URL]
Fischer, M.. 2008. “Juridisk oversættelse og en komparativ analyse af to fagekspertgruppers strategier – eller mangel herpå: advokaten i oversætterens univers og translatøren i advokatens univers.” MA Thesis. Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerloff, Pamela Ann. 1988. “From French to English: A Look at the Translation Process in Students, Bilinguals, and Professional Translators.” PhD Thesis. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Göpferich, Susanne. 2009. “Towards a Model of Translation Competence and Its Acquisition: The Longitudinal Study TransComp.” In Behind the Mind: Methods, Models and Results in Translation Process Research, ed. by Susanne Göpferich, Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, and Inger M. Meer, 11–38. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Gyde. 2002. “Zeit und Qualität im Übersetzungsprozess.” In Empirical Translation Studies: Process and Product, ed. by Gyde Hansen, 29–54. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hertog, Erik, ed. 2001. Aequitas: Access to Justice across Language and Culture in the EU. Antwerp: Lessius Hogeschool.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hurtado Albir, Amparo. 2001. Traducción y traductología. Introducción a la traductología. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jääskeläinen, Riitta. 1990. “Features of Successful Translation Processes: A Think-Aloud Protocol Study.” Licentiate Thesis. University of Joensuu, Finland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke. 2002. “Translation Drafting by Professional Translators and by Translation Students.” In Empirical Translation Studies: Process and Product, ed. by Gyde Hansen, 191–204. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, Dorothy. 2002. “Un modelo de competencia traductora: bases para el diseño curricular.” Puentes (1): 9–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiraly, Don. 1995. Pathways to Translation. Pedagogy and Process. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krings, Hans Peter. 1986. Was in den Köpfen von Übersetzern vorgeht: Eine empirische Untersuchung zur Struktur des Übersetzungsprozesses an fortgeschrittenen Französischlernern. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lesznyák, Márta. 2008. “Studies in the Development of Translation Competence.” PhD Thesis. University of Pécs.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Livbjerg, Inge, and Inger M. Mees. 1999. “A Study of the Use of Dictionaries in Danish-English Translation.” In Probing the Process in Translation: Methods and Results, ed. by Gyde Hansen, 135–149. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luukkainen, Tiina. 1996. “Comparisons of Translations Made with and without Reference Material: A Think-Aloud Protocol Study.” MA Thesis. University of Joensuu, Finland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Magris, Marella. 2005. L’errore in traduzione: dalla teoria alla pratica. Trieste: Goliardiche.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manganaras, Ioannis. 1996. “The Qualified Legal Translator Is a Lawyer Trained in Translation.” Lingua Legis 41: 62–73.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marashi, Hamid, and Mehrnaz Okhowat. 2013. “The Comparative Impact of Editing Texts Translated into Farsi with and without the Original English Texts.” Perspectives 21 (3): 299–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez Melis, Nicole, and Amparo Hurtado Albir. 2001. “Assessment in Translation Studies: Research Needs.” Meta: Journal des traducteurs 46 (2): 272–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martín-Mor, Adrià. 2011. “La interferència lingüística en entorns de traducció assistida per ordinador. Recerca empíricoexperimental.” MA Thesis. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morado Vázquez, Lucía. 2012. “An Empirical Study on the Influence of Translation Suggestions’ Provenance Metadata.” PhD Thesis. University of Limerick.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mossop, Brian. 1989. “Objective Translational Error and the Cultural Norm of Translation.” TTR: traduction, terminologie, rédaction 2 (2): 55–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Revising and Editing for Translators. Oxon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nord, Christiane. 1997. Translating as a Purposeful Activity. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Obenaus, Gerhard. 1995. “The Legal Translator as Information Broker.” In Translation and the Law, ed. by Marshall Morris, 247–259. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orlando, Daniele. 2011. “Norme redazionali della comunicazione e traduzione tecnica: uno studio empirico sull’inglese e l'italiano dei manuali d'officina.” MA Thesis. Università degli Studi di Trieste.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Executing the Instructions. An Empirical Investigation into the Usability of Technical Translations Done by Trainees.” Rivista Internazionale di Tecnica della Traduzione 151: 109–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orozco, Mariana, and Pilar Sánchez-Gijón.. 2011. “New Resources for Legal Translators.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 19 (1): 25–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
PACTE. 2003. “Building a Translation Competence Model.” In Triangulating Translation: Perspectives in Process-Oriented Research, ed. by Fábio Alves, 43–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Results of the Validation of the PACTE Translation Competence Model: Acceptability and Decision Making.” Across Languages and Cultures 10 (2): 207–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piecychna, Beata. 2013. “Legal Translation Competence in the Light of Translational Hermeneutics.” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 34 (1): 141–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prieto Ramos, Fernando. 2011. “Developing Legal Translation Competence: An Integrative Process-Oriented Approach.” Comparative Legilinguistics – International Journal for Legal Communication 51: 7–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Parameters for Problem-Solving in Legal Translation: Implications for Legal Lexicography and Institutional Terminology Management.” In The Ashgate Handbook of Legal Translation, ed. by Le Cheng, King Kui Sin, and Anne Wagner, 121–134. Farhnam: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quinci, Carla. 2015. “Translators in the Making: An Empirical Longitudinal Study on Translation Competence and Its Development.” PhD Thesis. Università degli studi di Trieste.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scarpa, Federica. 2008. La traduzione specializzata. Un approccio didattico professionale. 2nd ed. Milano: Hoepli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scarpa, Federica, and Daniele Orlando. (2017). “What It Takes to Do It Right: An Integrative EMT-Based Model for Legal Translation Competence.” JosTrans 17 (1): 21–42.
Schäffner, Christina. 1998. “From ‘Good’ to ‘Functionally Appropriate’: Assessing Translation Quality.” In Translation and Quality, ed. by Christina Schäffner, 1–5. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiaffino, Riccardo, and Franco Zearo. 2006. “Developing and Using a Translation Quality Index.” Multilingual (81): 53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Séguinot, Candace. 1989. “Understanding Why Translators Make Mistakes.” TTR: traduction, terminologie, rédaction 2 (2): 73–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. “Interpreting Errors in Translation.” Meta 35 (1): 68–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sofer, Morry. 2006. The Translator’s Handbook. Rockville: Schreiber Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teixeira, Carlos. 2014. “Data Collection Methods for Researching the Interaction between Translators and Translation Tools: An Ecological Approach.” In The Development of Translation Competence: Theories and Methodologies from Psycholinguistics and Cognitive Science, ed. by Aline Ferreira and John W. Schwieter, 267–284. Newcastle upon Tyn: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trosborg, Anna. 1997. Rhetorical Strategies in Legal Language: Discourse Analysis of Statutes and Contracts. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vollmar, Gabriele. 2001. “Damit die Qualität nicht in der Übersetzungsflut untergeht: Ein Modell für eine pragmatische Qualitätssicherung bei Übersetzungsprojekten.” Lebende Sprachen 46 (1): 2–6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Chiknaverova, Karine
2025. Interlanguage Interference: What Should Tutors be Aware of When Teaching Vocabulary in the Legal Translation Classroom?. In Translation, Translanguaging and Machine Translation in Foreign Language Education, ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Raído, Vanessa Enríquez, Erik Angelone & Christian Olalla Soler
2025. Screen recording. In Research Methods in Cognitive Translation and Interpreting Studies [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 10], ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Prieto Ramos, Fernando & Diego Guzmán
2024. The impact of specialised translator training and professional experience on legal translation quality assurance: an empirical study of revision performance. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 18:2 ► pp. 313 ff. DOI logo
Prieto Ramos, Fernando
2021. Legal and institutional translation. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 33:2 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Griebel, Cornelia
2020. “Article 1103: oh pff… yes—then concerns… the… um… unilateral contract…”. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 3:1 ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Griebel, Cornelia
2021. Legal meta-comments in the think-aloud protocols of legal translators and lawyers. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 33:2 ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue