Cover not available

Article published In: Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts
Vol. 4:2 (2018) ► pp.282–305

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

A model solution for English-Arabic-English translation students

A case study from the Lebanese University

 | Lebanese University
Published online: 26 April 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ttmc.00013.baz
Abstract
This paper proposes a model that addresses students’ common errors in English-Arabic-English translation. My study documents an attempt to develop a new interconnectedness between students’ errors and translation theories that may improve their performance when translating different genres. Consistent and repeated errors produced by tens of students working on the same texts were compiled and analyzed. The errors showed lack of knowledge of genre structure, functional analysis, appropriate intervention as well as lack of understanding of the wider context upon which appropriate decisions can be made. The methodology expounded in this study involves describing and categorizing students’ errors. It suggests solutions grounded in translation theory and proposes comparisons with professional translations. This methodology proved to be very successful during my teaching experience at the Lebanese University.
The model solution developed in this study draws on genre analysis, text-typology, text-functionality, register analysis, and equivalence. The application of the model solution minimized students’ errors to a large extent and enabled them to provide accurate descriptions of different translation strategies and critically assess professional translations.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The study
  • 3.Building a model solution
    • 3.1Description of common errors in the light of translation theory
    • 3.2Proposed methods in translation pedagogy
  • 4.The model in practice: Illustrative cases
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
References (27)
References
Baker, Mona. 2011. In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1934/1965. Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Catford, John. 1965. A Linguistic Theory of Translation. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dickins, James, Sandor Hervey, and Ian Higgins. 2002. Thinking Arabic Translation: A Course in Translation Method: Arabic to English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elmgrab, Ramadan. 2013. “Implication for Translation Teaching Pedagogy: A Case of Benghazi University.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 701: 358–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatim, Basil. 1997. English-Arabic/Arabic-English Translation: A Practical Guide. London: Saqi Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatim, Basil, and Ian Mason. 1990. Discourse and the Translator. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. The Translator as Communicator. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hermans, Theo. 1999. Translation in Systems: Descriptive and Systemic Approaches Explained. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
House, Juliane. 1997. Translation Quality Assessment. A Model Revisited. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koller, Werner. 1979. Einführung in die Übersetzungswissenschaft. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The concept of equivalence and the object of translation studies. Target, 7 (2): 191–222.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malmkjær, Kirsten. 1991. The Linguistics Encyclopedia. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munday, Jeremy. 2012. Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newmark, Peter. 1981. Approaches to Translation. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. A Textbook of Translation. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene. 1964. Toward a Science of Translating: With Special Reference to Principles and Procedures Involved in Bible Translating. Leiden, Holland: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nord, Christiane. 1997. Translating as a Purposeful Activity: Functionalist Approaches Explained. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reiss, Katharina. 2000. Translation Criticism – The Potentials and Limitations: Categories and Criteria for Translation Quality Assessment. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toury, Gideon. 2012. Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Revised Edition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun. A. 1988. News as Discourse. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence. 2000. The Translation Studies Reader. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vermeer, Hans. J. 2000. “Skopos and Commission in Translational Action.” In The Translation Studies Reader, ed. by Lawrence Venuti, 221–232. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vinay, Jean-Paul, and Jean Darbelnet. 2000. “A Methodology for Translation.” In The Translation Studies Reader, ed. by Lawrence Venuti, 84–93. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Bazzi, Samia & Yuran Shi
2020. The contribution of register analysis to the translation of Red Sorghum . Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 6:3 ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue