In:Reciprocals and Semantic Typology
Edited by Nicholas Evans, Alice Gaby, Stephen C. Levinson and Asifa Majid
[Typological Studies in Language 98] 2011
► pp. 265–276
16. Reciprocal constructions in Olutec
Published online: 18 August 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.98.16zav
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.98.16zav
Olutec exhibits three reciprocal strategies each of which convey different levels of prominence of the second reciprocant. In the conjoined subject strategy/, both reciprocants share the same topical status. In the /subject cum adjunct strategy/ the second reciprocant is treated as background information; while in the /subject and object strategy/, the second reciprocant shares the same degree of prominence with the regular primary object. The existence of these three strategies within a language indicates that the pragmatic status of the reciprocants is a key factor to be considered in the cross-linguistic study of reciprocal constructions.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Gildea, Spike & Joana Jansen
2018. The development of referential hierarchy effects in Sahaptian. In Typological hierarchies in synchrony and diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121], ► pp. 131 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
