In:Reciprocals and Semantic Typology
Edited by Nicholas Evans, Alice Gaby, Stephen C. Levinson and Asifa Majid
[Typological Studies in Language 98] 2011
► pp. 1–28
1. Introduction
Reciprocals and semantic typology
Published online: 18 August 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.98.01intro
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.98.01intro
Reciprocity lies at the heart of social cognition, and with it so does the encoding of reciprocity in language via reciprocal constructions. Despite the prominence of strong universal claims about the semantics of reciprocal constructions, there is considerable descriptive literature on the semantics of reciprocals that seems to indicate variable coding and subtle cross-linguistic differences in meaning of reciprocals, both of which would make it impossible to formulate a single, essentialising definition of reciprocal semantics. These problems make it vital for studies in the semantic typology of reciprocals to employ methodologies that allow the relevant categories to emerge objectively from cross-linguistic comparison of standardised stimulus materials. We situate the rationale for the 20-language study that forms the basis for this book within this empirical approach to semantic typology, and summarise some of the findings.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Yakpo, Kofi
Nordlinger, Rachel
Inglese, Guglielmo & Chiara Zanchi
Koch, Lennart
Inglese, Guglielmo
2017. A synchronic and diachronic typology of Hittite reciprocal constructions. Studies in Language 41:4 ► pp. 956 ff.
Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur A.
Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur A.
2014. Notes on the history of reciprocal NP-strategies in Semitic languages in a typological perspective. Diachronica 31:3 ► pp. 337 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
