In:Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives
Edited by Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta and Janick Wrona
[Typological Studies in Language 96] 2011
► pp. 343–360
Finite structures from clausal nominalization in Tibeto-Burman
Published online: 29 June 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.96.12del
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.96.12del
Nominalization has long been recognized as one of the driving processes of Tibeto-Burman syntax and syntactic change. A pervasive and recurrent process in the family is the replacement of old finite clause structures with new constructions based on nominalizations. TB languages repeatedly innovate new, marked clausal constructions with a nominalized verb and finite copula. The process is exemplified through case studies from Tibetan, Sunwar (from the Kiranti branch of TB), and the Kuki-Chin branch. Frequently such constructions lose their marked status and become the ordinary finite construction, resulting in the creation of new verbal categories and systems. Many TB verbal systems transparently reflect this origin, for example Modern Tibetan tense/aspect forms like -pa yin, -pa red, both consisting of the nominalizer -pa in construction with an equational copula. As such a construction becomes more opaque, a language may be left with a semantically empty final particle, reflecting an erstwhile nominalizer or copula. The prevalence of such final particles in the family is evidence of the pervasiveness of the phenomenon which is described in this paper.
Cited by (27)
Cited by 27 other publications
Barotto, Alessandra & Andrea Sansò
Lee, Wei-Wei & Mathias Jenny
Inglis, Douglas
Pons, Marie-Caroline
2021. On the origin of 2nd person prefix #tV- in Trans-Himalayan languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 44:2 ► pp. 226 ff.
Grollmann, Selin
2020. Diachronic aspects of Bjokapakha epistemic verbal morphology. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 43:1 ► pp. 87 ff.
Gerner, Matthias
2019. Towards diachronic word classes universals. In Historical Linguistics 2015 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 348], ► pp. 501 ff.
Peña, Jaime
2019. Form and functions of nominalization in Wampis. In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language, 124], ► pp. 419 ff.
Overall, Simon E.
Widmer, Manuel
2018. Transitivity markers in West Himalayish. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 41:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
Bugaeva, Anna
2017. Noun-modifying clause constructions in Ainu. In Noun-modifying clause constructions in languages of Eurasia [Typological Studies in Language, 116], ► pp. 203 ff.
Honda, Isao
2017. The (pro)nominalizer -la(ŋ) in Tamangic. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 40:2 ► pp. 243 ff.
van der Auwera, Johan & Frens Vossen
Konnerth, Linda
2016. The Proto-Tibeto-Burman*gV-nominalizing prefix. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 39:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Konnerth, Linda
Robbeets, Martine
2016. Chapter 9. Insubordination and the establishment of genealogical relationship across Eurasia. In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115], ► pp. 209 ff.
Robbeets, Martine
Sansò, Andrea
Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
Givón, T.
DeLancey, Scott
2014. Second person verb forms in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
DeLancey, Scott
DeLancey, Scott
Hyslop, Gwendolyn
Hyslop, Gwendolyn
Rice, Keren
2014. Review of Thornes, Andvik, Hyslop & Jansen (2013): Functional-Historical Approaches to Explanation. In honor of Scott DeLancey. Studies in Language 38:2 ► pp. 421 ff.
Yap, Foong Ha & Winnie Chor
2014. Epistemic, evidential and attitudinal markers in clause-medial position in Cantonese. In Modes of Modality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 149], ► pp. 219 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
