In:Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research
Edited by An Van linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete and Kristin Davidse
[Typological Studies in Language 94] 2010
► pp. 289–326
To dare to or not to
Is auxiliarization reversible?
Published online: 25 November 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.94.11sch
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.94.11sch
This article revisits the alleged unidirectionality of grammaticalization, focusing on the marginal modal dare, which previous research has discussed as a potential counterexample. Being in its origin a member of the inhomogeneous group of modal auxiliaries, dare has since Early Modern English times developed certain full verb characteristics that would assign it a place near the lexical end of the grammaticalization scale. This study provides detailed corpus data, yielding a complex picture that defies an easy localization of dare on the lexical – grammatical scale: different verb forms of dare have to be distinguished, which appear to occupy different stages of evolution or even tend to drift into opposite directions. The results furthermore point to cross-cutting influences on the marking of dependent infinitives (rhythm, grammatical complexity).
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Bemposta-Rivas, Sofia
2019. A corpus-based study on the development of dare in Middle English and Early Modern English. In Developments in English Historical Morpho-syntax [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 346], ► pp. 129 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
