In:The Expression of Information Structure: A documentation of its diversity across Africa
Edited by Ines Fiedler and Anne Schwarz
[Typological Studies in Language 91] 2010
► pp. 315–348
Why contrast matters
Information structure in Gawwada (East Cushitic)
Published online: 24 March 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.91.12tos
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.91.12tos
The article discusses the information structure of Gawwada, an East Cushitic language of Southwest Ethiopia, along the lines of the Prague School and Lambrecht’s (1994) theory. Gawwada does not have any dedicated focus-marking device – contrary to previous preliminary statements and in stark contrast with many Cushitic languages of the Horn of Africa. Moreover, it is argued that the category of focus itself is only scarcely grammaticalized in this language. It is rather “Contrast”, marked through a clitic element =kka, which is central to the information structure of the language. It is also argued that possibly other purported Focus Markers of other Cushitic languages (most notably Somali) may be interpreted, at least partially, as markers of contrast. Other pragmatic-marking strategies discussed in the article include the presence vs. absence of Subject-Verb agreement, the presence vs. absence of Subject Clitics, and, to a lesser degree, word order change and object-incorporation.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Amaral, Patrícia, Zuoyu Tian, Dylan Jarrett & Juan Escalona Torres
Yang, Xiaolong & Yicheng Wu
Mettouchi, Amina, Graziano Savà & Mauro Tosco
2015. Cross-linguistic comparability in CorpAfroAs. In Corpus-based Studies of Lesser-described Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 68], ► pp. 221 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
