The psycholinguistic reality of collocation and semantic prosody(2): Affective priming

Ellis, Nick C.; Frey, Eric

doi:10.1075/tsl.83.13ell

In:Formulaic Language: Volume 2. Acquisition, loss, psychological reality, and functional explanations
Edited by Roberta Corrigan, Edith A. Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali and Kathleen Wheatley
[Typological Studies in Language 83] 2009
► pp. 473–498

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

The psycholinguistic reality of collocation and semantic prosody(2): Affective priming

Nick C. Ellis

Eric Frey

Published online: 20 May 2009

https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.83.13ell

Cited by (17)

Cited by 17 other publications

Order by:

Zhang, Lei & Xuemei Tang

2025. Exploring psycholinguistic reality of local grammar patterns: a case study of health metaphor in research articles of economics. Folia Linguistica

Hauser, David J. & James Hillman

2024. What Does It Mean to Be “Utterly Content”? Semantic Prosody Impacts Nuanced Inferences Beyond Just Valence. Social Cognition 42:1 ► pp. 61 ff.

Hou, Xiaoming

2023. Syntactic blocking on L2 acquisition of Mandarin Ba-construction. Applied Psycholinguistics 44:2 ► pp. 157 ff.

Hauser, David J. & Norbert Schwarz

2022. Implicit Bias Reflects the Company That Words Keep. Frontiers in Psychology 13

Hauser, David J. & Norbert Schwarz

2023. Semantic Prosody: How Neutral Words With Collocational Positivity/Negativity Color Evaluative Judgments. Current Directions in Psychological Science 32:2 ► pp. 98 ff.

Dushku, Silvana & Youngshil Paek

2021. Investigating ESL learners’ awareness of semantic prosody across proficiency levels. Language Awareness 30:3 ► pp. 234 ff.

Shadrova, Anna, Pia Linscheid, Julia Lukassek, Anke Lüdeling & Sarah Schneider

2021. A Challenge for Contrastive L1/L2 Corpus Studies: Large Inter- and Intra-Individual Variation Across Morphological, but Not Global Syntactic Categories in Task-Based Corpus Data of a Homogeneous L1 German Group. Frontiers in Psychology 12

Omidian, Taha & Anna Siyanova‐Chanturia

2020. Semantic Prosody Revisited: Implications for Language Learning. TESOL Quarterly 54:2 ► pp. 512 ff.

Vetchinnikova, Svetlana

2019. Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,

Nordquist, Dawn

2018. look up about. In Functionalist and usage-based approaches to the study of language [Studies in Language Companion Series, 192], ► pp. 225 ff.

Schneider, Gerold & Gintarė Grigonytė

2018. From lexical bundles to surprisal and language models. In Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 82], ► pp. 15 ff.

Tang, Xuri & Gaixiang Liu

2018. Solving contradictions in semantic prosody analysis with prosody concord. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:4 ► pp. 437 ff.

Sánchez, Ignacio Rodríguez

2013. Frequency and Specialization in Spanish Binomials N y N. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 95 ► pp. 284 ff.

Wray, Alison

2011. Formulaic Language as a Barrier to Effective Communication with People with Alzheimer's Disease. The Canadian Modern Language Review 67:4 ► pp. 429 ff.

Wray, Alison

2012. What Do We (Think We) Know About Formulaic Language? An Evaluation of the Current State of Play. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32 ► pp. 231 ff.

[no author supplied]

2020. Language processing in advanced learners of English [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 9],

[no author supplied]

2021. References. In Foundations of Familiar Language, ► pp. 386 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.