Cover not available

In:Formulaic Language: Volume 1. Distribution and historical change
Edited by Roberta Corrigan, Edith A. Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali and Kathleen Wheatley
[Typological Studies in Language 82] 2009
► pp. 7796

Get fulltext from our e-platform
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Gholami, Leila
2022. Incidental corrective feedback provision for formulaic vs. Non-formulaic errors: EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Awareness 31:1  pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Gholami, Leila
2024. Oral corrective feedback and learner uptake in L2 classrooms: Non-formulaic vs. formulaic errors. Language Teaching Research 28:3  pp. 860 ff. DOI logo
Wood, David
2021. Phoebe M. S. Lin, The prosody of formulaic sequences: A corpus and discourse approach. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 2018. Pp. 248. ISBN 9781441100856.. English Language and Linguistics 25:2  pp. 409 ff. DOI logo
Granvik, Anton & Susanna Taimitarha
2014. Topic-marking prepositions in Swedish: A corpus-based analysis of adpositional synonymy. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 37:2  pp. 257 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue