In:Formulaic Language: Volume 1. Distribution and historical change
Edited by Roberta Corrigan, Edith A. Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali and Kathleen Wheatley
[Typological Studies in Language 82] 2009
► pp. 27–52
Identifying formulaic language
Persistent challenges and new opportunities
Published online: 20 May 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.82.02ide
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.82.02ide
Identifying examples of formulaic language in text is a non-trivial challenge, but the difficulties can be much alleviated by the use of an appropriate definition. Three types of definition are distinguished. Type (i) lays out an analytic working space. Type (ii) derives from an analysis and represents a theoretical position. Type (iii) locates examples for subsequent analysis. Examples of each type are discussed. Extreme examples of formulaicity (pre-memorized material, political slogans and military bugle calls) are then used to explore the boundaries of the definition of formulaicity as morpheme-equivalence. Addressing the question ‘Do formulaic sequences constrain expression?’ reveals the inherent tension between novelty and formulaicity in balancing processing parsimony and the need to respond appropriately in unique communicative events.
Cited by (50)
Cited by 50 other publications
Dzienisiewicz, Daniel
Burke, Isabelle & Howard Manns
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix
Filatkina, Natalia
Szczygłowska, Tatiana
Maziarz, Marek, Łukasz Grabowski, Tadeusz Piotrowski, Ewa Rudnicka & Maciej Piasecki
Chen, Rachel S. Y.
Contreras Kallens, Pablo & Morten H. Christiansen
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
Jourdain, Morgane
Yu, Yue
Bator, Magdalena
2021. Lexical fixedness within the field of Life Sciences in Late Modern
English. In “All families and genera”, ► pp. 115 ff.
Kuteva, Tania & Bernd Heine
Jourdain, Morgane, Emmanuelle Canut & Karen Lahousse
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2020. Formulaic language and Discourse Grammar. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70], ► pp. 233 ff.
Khamkhien, Attapol & Sue Wharton
Alghamdi, Ayman & Eric Atwell
2019. Constructing a corpus-informed list of Arabic formulaic sequences (ArFSs) for language pedagogy and technology. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:2 ► pp. 202 ff.
Kucała, Bożena
Hsieh, Shu-Kai, Chiung-Yu Chiang, Yu-Hsiang Tseng, Bo-Ya Wang, Tai-Li Chou & Chia-Lin Lee
Shibasaki, Reijirou
2018. Sequentiality and the emergence of new constructions. In Explorations in English historical syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 198], ► pp. 283 ff.
Shibasaki, Reijirou
2018. From the inside to the outside of the sentence. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202], ► pp. 333 ff.
Shibasaki, Reijirou
Villalba Ibañez, Cristina
Myles, Florence & Caroline Cordier
Stolk, Joanne Vera & Delphine Nachtergaele
HEINE, BERND, TANIA KUTEVA & GUNTHER KALTENBÖCK
Martinez, Ron & Norbert Schmitt
Schulte, Michael
2012. Review of Götzsche (2010): Memory, Mind and Language. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 64-65 ► pp. 227 ff.
Wray, Alison
Wray, Alison
[no author supplied]
2020. Dualistic approaches to the analysis of forms and structures in languages. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70], ► pp. 157 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
