Definiteness and Referentiality in Turkish Verbal Sentences

Dede, Müserref

doi:10.1075/tsl.8.09ded

In:Studies in Turkish Linguistics
Edited by Dan I. Slobin and Karl Zimmer
[Typological Studies in Language 8] 1986
► pp. 147–164

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Definiteness and Referentiality in Turkish Verbal Sentences

Müserref Dede

Published online: 1 January 1986

https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.8.09ded

Cited by (27)

Cited by 27 other publications

Order by:

Lindgren, Josefin & Ute Bohnacker

2024. (In)definites, pronouns and bare nouns: How Turkish/Swedish bilingual 4-to-7-year-olds introduce characters in narratives in Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff.

Özçelik, Öner

2024. The Phonology of Turkish,

Dikmen, Furkan, Ömer Demirok & Ümit Atlamaz

2023. Revisiting agent pseudo-incorporation in Turkish: a dependent case theoretic perspective. The Linguistic Review 40:4 ► pp. 561 ff.

Driemel, Imke

2023. Pseudo-Noun Incorporation and Differential Object Marking,

Mattissen, Johanna

2023. Incorporation. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff.

Uygun, Serkan

2023. Vulnerability in processing definiteness: The case of heritage Turkish. Frontiers in Psychology 14

YILMAZ, Gülsen & Antje SAUERMANN

2023. Complete acquisition in the heritage language: Evidence from indefiniteness in Turkish. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi :33 ► pp. 813 ff.

Coskun Kunduz, Aylin & Silvina Montrul

2022. Sources of variability in the acquisition of Differential Object Marking by Turkish heritage language children in the United States. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 25:4 ► pp. 603 ff.

Kizilkaya, Semra, Zarina Levy-Forsythe & Klaus von Heusinger

2022. Affectedness and Differential Object Marking in Turkish and Uzbek. Linguistics 60:6 ► pp. 1907 ff.

Longa, Víctor M. & Juan J. López-Rivera

2022. On Dixon’s ‘dangerous idea’. Folia Linguistica 56:2 ► pp. 469 ff.

Aktan-Erciyes, Aslı, Burcu Ünlütabak & Betül Firdevs Zengin

2021. Effects of second-language acquisition on character introductions in 5- and 7-year-old bilingual and monolingual children’s Frog story narratives. First Language 41:5 ► pp. 605 ff.

ATASOY, Gülsüm

2020. Book Review Discourse Meaning: The view from Turkish. 2020. Zeyrek, D., and Özge U. (Eds.). De Gruyter Mouton. 284 pages. ISBN 978-3-11-067892-5. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 31:2 ► pp. 313 ff.

Kerslake, Celia

2020. Subject marking of -DIK/-(y)AcAK complement clauses in written Turkish of the late Ottoman period (1860–1914). In Morphological Complexity within and across Boundaries [Studies in Language Companion Series, 215], ► pp. 121 ff.

Krause, Elif & Leah Roberts

2020. Chapter 12. Over-sensitivity to the animacy constraint on DOM in low proficient Turkish heritage speakers. In The Acquisition of Differential Object Marking [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 26], ► pp. 313 ff.

Krause, Elif & Leah Roberts

2020. Over-sensitivity to the animacy constraint on DOM in low proficient Turkish heritage speakers. In The Acquisition of Differential Object Marking [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 26], ► pp. 313 ff.

Krause, Elif & Klaus von Heusinger

2019. Gradient Effects of Animacy on Differential Object Marking in Turkish. Open Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 171 ff.

Topsakal, Ozan, Onur Acikgoz, Ali Tunca Gurkan, Ali Bugra Kanburoglu, Burak Ertopcu, Berke Ozenc, Ilker Cam, Begum Avar, Gokhan Ercan & Olcay Taner Yildiz

2017. 2017 International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK), ► pp. 480 ff.

Ateş, Beyza Ş., Özlem Ece Demir-Lira & Aylin C. Küntay

2016. Children’s referential choices in Turkish. In The Acquisition of Turkish in Childhood [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 20], ► pp. 153 ff.

Bolgün, M. Ali

2013. The Significance of Data-driven Descriptions of Forms in Explicit Grammar Instruction. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 70 ► pp. 430 ff.

Kagan, Olga

2013. Irrealis Genitive in a Broader Context. In Semantics of Genitive Objects in Russian [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 89], ► pp. 161 ff.

Papadopoulou, Despina, Spyridoula Varlokosta, Vassilios Spyropoulos, Hasan Kaili, Sophia Prokou & Anthi Revithiadou

2011. Case morphology and word order in second language Turkish: Evidence from Greek learners. Second Language Research 27:2 ► pp. 173 ff.

BAHTIYAR, SEVDA & AYLIN C. KÜNTAY

2009. Integration of communicative partner's visual perspective in patterns of referential requests. Journal of Child Language 36:3 ► pp. 529 ff.

DOĞRUÖZ, A. SEZA & AD BACKUS

2009. Innovative constructions in Dutch Turkish: An assessment of ongoing contact-induced change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12:1 ► pp. 41 ff.

GÖKSUN, TILBE, AYLIN C. KÜNTAY & LETITIA R. NAIGLES

2008. Turkish children use morphosyntactic bootstrapping in interpreting verb meaning. Journal of Child Language 35:2 ► pp. 291 ff.

Kornfilt, Jaklin

2003. Subject Case in Turkish nominalized clauses. In Syntactic Structures and Morphological Information, ► pp. 129 ff.

Kuntay, Aylin C.

2002. Development of the Expression of Indefiniteness: Presenting New Referents in Turkish Picture-Series Stories. Discourse Processes 33:1 ► pp. 77 ff.

[no author supplied]

2003. References. In Word Order and Scrambling, ► pp. 345 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.