In:Modality–Aspect Interfaces: Implications and typological solutions
Edited by Werner Abraham and Elisabeth Leiss
[Typological Studies in Language 79] 2008
► pp. 81–96
Towards an understanding of the progressive form in English: The Imperative as a heuristic tool
Published online: 26 June 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.79.08fra
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.79.08fra
The general aim of the study is an exploration into the meaning of a grammatical form and the proofs of its meaning. The scope of this study is the form referred to as the “progressive aspect” in English. The absence of an imperative progressive is used as a heuristic tool in the determination of the categoriality of the progressive. The study proposes that the primary function of the progressive form in English is not that of indicating the internal structure of the event, that is, an aspect, but rather of coding the clause as pragmatically dependent. Such clauses must be interpreted in connection with another proposition or time. The other proposition might be mentioned in the preceding or the following discourse. The time may be overtly coded in the same or in a different clause. If no time or other proposition is overtly coded, the clause containing the progressive form is interpreted with respect to the time of speech or the situation surrounding the speech event.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Sazhumyan, Haykanush & Alice Blumenthal-Dramé
Cinque, Guglielmo
2022. On the status of functional categories (heads and phrases). Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 ► pp. 521 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
