A typological perspective: Intensifiers and reflexives

König, Ekkehard; Siemund, Peter

doi:10.1075/tsl.40.03kon

In:Reflexives: Forms and functions
Edited by Zygmunt Frajzyngier and Traci Walker
[Typological Studies in Language 40] 2000
► pp. 41–74

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Intensifiers and reflexives

A typological perspective

Ekkehard König

Peter Siemund

Published online: 15 March 2000

https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.40.03kon

Cited by (58)

Cited by 58 other publications

Order by:

Lai, Ryan Ka Yau

2024. Beyond anaphoric and emphatic: diversity and unity in the functions of literary Chinese reflexive zì . Folia Linguistica 58:1 ► pp. 79 ff.

Benedetti, Marina & Chiara Gianollo

2023. Morphosyntactic Contact in Translation: Greek ídios and Latin proprius in the Bible. Transactions of the Philological Society 121:3 ► pp. 404 ff.

Claire Bowern

2023. The Oxford Guide to Australian Languages,

Inglese, Guglielmo & Andrea Sansò

2023. Introduction: towards a diachronic typology of the middle voice. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 76:2 ► pp. 113 ff.

Kiss, Katalin É. & Nikolett Mus

2022. The reflexive cycle. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 43 ff.

Lyutikova, Ekaterina

2022. Agreeing inflected quantifiers, intensifiers and anaphors as derived personal pronouns: Evidence from Tatar. Word Structure 15:3 ► pp. 380 ff.

Portero-Muñoz, Carmen

2022. “It’s way too intriguing!” The fuzzy status of emergent intensifiers: A Functional Discourse Grammar account. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 618 ff.

Burukina, Irina

2021. Profile of reflexives in Hill Mari. Folia Linguistica 55:1 ► pp. 127 ff.

Burukina, Irina

2023. On the syntax of postpositional phrasesin Mari. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 2:2 ► pp. 158 ff.

Garr, W. Randall

2021. Reflexivity: The Cases of theNiphalandHithpael. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 80:2 ► pp. 341 ff.

Liao, Hsiu-Chen Daphne

2021. A unified semantic analysis of Chinese adverbialziji. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 22:4 ► pp. 513 ff.

Puddu, Nicoletta

2021. Verbal vs. nominal reflexive constructions. In Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology [Typological Studies in Language, 132], ► pp. 367 ff.

Roy, Gargi, Kārumūri V Subbārāo, Rajesh Kumar & Martin Everaert

2021. Kokborok and the simple-complex reflexive distinction. Studies in Language 45:2 ► pp. 384 ff.

Inglese, Guglielmo & Chiara Zanchi

2020. Reciprocal constructions in Homeric Greek: A typological and corpus-based approach. Folia Linguistica 54:s41-s1 ► pp. 117 ff.

Jones, Ethan

2020. “He May Do Harm . . .”: Translation and Meaning of 2 Sam 12.18. The Bible Translator 71:3 ► pp. 303 ff.

Orqueda, Verónica, Silvana Arriagada & Francisca Toro

2020. Spanish [auto +V+ se] constructions. Folia Linguistica 54:3 ► pp. 615 ff.

Orqueda, Verónica, Silvana Arriagada & Francisca Toro

2020. Spanish [auto +V+ se] constructions. Folia Linguistica 54:3 ► pp. 615 ff.

Robert, Stéphane

2020. On the grammatical uses of the ‘head’ in Wolof. In Body Part Terms in Conceptualization and Language Usage [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 12], ► pp. 133 ff.

Salaberri, Iker

2020. Grammaticalization of reflexivity in Basque. Journal of Historical Linguistics 10:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Salaberri, Iker

2020. Hebetic ioan gabe ene buruya: zenbait gogoeta buru hitzaren erabilera anaforikoen eta bihurkarien diakroniaz. Fontes Linguae Vasconum :130 ► pp. 445 ff.

Sperlich, Darcy

2020. A Final Synthesis. In Reflexive Pronouns: A Theoretical and Experimental Synthesis [Language, Cognition, and Mind, 8], ► pp. 173 ff.

Sperlich, Darcy

2020. A Beginning Synthesis. In Reflexive Pronouns: A Theoretical and Experimental Synthesis [Language, Cognition, and Mind, 8], ► pp. 1 ff.

DOĞAN, Talip

2019. GÜNEY AZERBAYCAN TÜRKÇESİNDE “ÖZ” VE “BİLE” ZAMİRLERİ. Selçuk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi :45 ► pp. 219 ff.

Huyghe, Richard

2019. Les formes réfléchies du verbe : présentation. Langages N° 216:4 ► pp. 5 ff.

H. Ekkehard Wolff

2019. The Cambridge Handbook of African Linguistics,

COLE, MARCELLE

2017. Pronominal anaphoric strategies in the West Saxon dialect of Old English. English Language and Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 381 ff.

Inglese, Guglielmo

2017. A synchronic and diachronic typology of Hittite reciprocal constructions. Studies in Language 41:4 ► pp. 956 ff.

Inglese, Guglielmo

2022. Towards a typology of middle voice systems. Linguistic Typology 26:3 ► pp. 489 ff.

Inglese, Guglielmo

2022. How do middle voice markers and valency reducing constructions interact? Typological tendencies and diachronic considerations. Folia Linguistica 56:2 ► pp. 239 ff.

Inglese, Guglielmo

2023. The rise of middle voice systems. Diachronica 40:2 ► pp. 195 ff.

Inglese, Guglielmo

2023. The journey of the middle voice: from antiquity to linguistic typology. Language & History 66:2 ► pp. 201 ff.

Moyse‐Faurie, Claire

2017. Reflexives Markers in Oceanic Languages. Studia Linguistica 71:1-2 ► pp. 107 ff.

Garzonio, Jacopo

2016. Cancellazione dei riflessivi e diatesi media in russo. In Le lingue slave tra struttura e uso [Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici, 31], ► pp. 127 ff.

Forker, Diana

2015. Towards a semantic map for intensifying particles: Evidence from Avar. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 68:4 ► pp. 485 ff.

Hernández, Nuria

2015. Chapter 3. Free self-forms in discourse-pragmatic functions. In The Pragmatics of Personal Pronouns [Studies in Language Companion Series, 171], ► pp. 45 ff.

ORQUEDA, Verónica

2015. VARIACIÓN SEMÁNTICA DE ĀTMÁN- EN EL R̥GVEDA Y EL ATHARVAVEDA. Alfa : Revista de Linguística (São José do Rio Preto) 59:2 ► pp. 335 ff.

Reuland, Eric

2014. Reflexives. In Oxford Handbook Topics in Linguistics,

Reuland, Eric

2018. Reflexives and Reflexivity. Annual Review of Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 81 ff.

Safir, Ken

2014. One True Anaphor. Linguistic Inquiry 45:1 ► pp. 91 ff.

SIEMUND, PETER

2014. The emergence of English reflexive verbs: an analysis based on theOxford English Dictionary. English Language and Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 49 ff.

Siemund, Peter

2017. English exclamative clauses and interrogative degree modification. In Exploring Intensification [Studies in Language Companion Series, 189], ► pp. 207 ff.

Kummerow, David

2012. The Person That Isn't: On Defining the Third-Person, Negatively and Positively So. Australian Journal of Linguistics 32:2 ► pp. 259 ff.

Heine, Bernd & Kyung-An Song

2010. On the genesis of personal pronouns: Some conceptual sources. Language and Cognition 2:1 ► pp. 117 ff.

HEINE, BERND & KYUNG-AN SONG

2011. On the grammaticalization of personal pronouns. Journal of Linguistics 47:3 ► pp. 587 ff.

Lødrup, Helge

2010. Implicit possessives and reflexive binding in Norwegian. Transactions of the Philological Society 108:2 ► pp. 89 ff.

Kulikov, Leonid

2007. The reflexive pronouns in Vedic: A diachronic and typological perspective. Lingua 117:8 ► pp. 1412 ff.

Heine, Bernd

2005. On reflexive forms in creoles. Lingua 115:3 ► pp. 201 ff.

Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva

2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change,

Fischer, Silke

2004. Optimal Binding. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22:3 ► pp. 481 ff.

Siewierska, Anna

2004. Person,

MORITA, JOE

2003. ON THE STRUCTURE AND (UN) PASSIVIZABILITY OF CONTAIN. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 20:1 ► pp. 169 ff.

MOHRI, FUMIO

2002. NON-AGENT SUBJECTS AND SLOPPY READINGS. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 19:1 ► pp. 29 ff.

Haspelmath, Martin

2001. Indefinite Pronouns,

[no author supplied]

2003. Bibliography. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ► pp. 744 ff.

[no author supplied]

2006. Bibliography. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 742 ff.

[no author supplied]

2013. Reflexivity and reflexive marking. In Varieties of English, ► pp. 23 ff.

[no author supplied]

2017. Bibliography. In The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Linguistics: A Handbook for Language Teaching, ► pp. 744 ff.

[no author supplied]

2019. Diachrony of Personal Pronouns in Japanese [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 344],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.