How readers construct situation models for stories. The role of suntactic cues and causal inferences

Kintsch, Walter

doi:10.1075/tsl.31.06kin

In:Coherence in Spontaneous Text
Edited by Morton Ann Gernsbacher and T. Givón
[Typological Studies in Language 31] 1995
► pp. 139–160

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

How readers construct situation models for stories. The role of suntactic cues and causal inferences

Walter Kintsch

Published online: 23 March 1995

https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.31.06kin

Cited by (17)

Cited by 17 other publications

Order by:

Harvey, Peter

2025. Strategies of text-world consolidation in reviews of Margaret Atwood’s Surfacing . Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 34:4 ► pp. 387 ff.

List, Alexandra

2025. Integrating prior knowledge and multiple texts: expanding the Documents Model Framework. Reading and Writing

Reichelt, Anja C., Ludger Tebartz van Elst, Evelyn C. Ferstl & Andreas Riedel

2025. Humor in ASD: a differentiation between text comprehension difficulties and humor appreciation. HUMOR

Endres, Tino & Alexander Eitel

2024. Motivation brought to the test: Successful retrieval practice is modulated by mastery goal orientation and external rewards. Applied Cognitive Psychology 38:1

McDaniel, Mark A., Elizabeth J. Marsh & Reshma Gouravajhala

2022. Individual Differences in Structure Building: Impacts on Comprehension and Learning, Theoretical Underpinnings, and Support for Less Able Structure Builders. Perspectives on Psychological Science 17:2 ► pp. 385 ff.

Zuljan Kumar, Danila

2022. Strategies for establishing discourse coherence. The case of Slovene dialectal discourse. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 30:1 ► pp. 51 ff.

Baldwin, Peter, Victoria Yaneva, Janet Mee, Brian E. Clauser & Le An Ha

2021. Using Natural Language Processing to Predict Item Response Times and Improve Test Construction. Journal of Educational Measurement 58:1 ► pp. 4 ff.

Crossley, Scott A., Kristopher Kyle & Mihai Dascalu

2019. The Tool for the Automatic Analysis of Cohesion 2.0: Integrating semantic similarity and text overlap. Behavior Research Methods 51:1 ► pp. 14 ff.

Schramm, Andreas & Michael C. Mensink

2016. Processing of aspectual meanings by non-native and native English speakers during narrative comprehension. In New Approaches to English Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 177], ► pp. 251 ff.

Kalyuga, Slava, Yin Kum Law & Chee Ha Lee

2013. Expertise reversal effect in reading Chinese texts with added causal words. Instructional Science 41:3 ► pp. 481 ff.

Kalyuga, Slava

2006. Rapid Assessment of Learners’ Proficiency: A cognitive load approach. Educational Psychology 26:6 ► pp. 735 ff.

Kalyuga, Slava

2012. Cognitive Load Aspects of Text Processing. In Cross-Disciplinary Advances in Applied Natural Language Processing, ► pp. 114 ff.

Max Louwerse

2002. An analytic and cognitive parameterization of coherence relations. cogl 12:3 ► pp. 291 ff.

Grabe, William

2000. Textual coherence and discourse analysis. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Series S 16 ► pp. 65 ff.

François, Jacques

1999. La compréhension des syntagmes participiaux préposés sans déterminant dans les langues germaniques et spécialement en allemand. Linx :11 ► pp. 139 ff.

François, Jacques

2003. La faculté de langage : travaux récents d’inspiration fonctionaliste sur son architecture, ses universaux, son émergence et sa transmission. Corela :1-1

Reyna, V.F. & C.J. Brainerd

1991. Fuzzy-trace theory and children's acquisition of mathematical and scientific concepts. Learning and Individual Differences 3:1 ► pp. 27 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.