Voice in Philippine languages

Shibatani, Masayoshi

doi:10.1075/tsl.16.06shi

In:Passive and Voice
Edited by Masayoshi Shibatani
[Typological Studies in Language 16] 1988
► pp. 85–142

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Voice in Philippine languages

Masayoshi Shibatani

Published online: 1 January 1988

https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.16.06shi

Cited by (23)

Cited by 23 other publications

Order by:

Aribatado, Reynamer & Michael John Jamora

2025. Coherence of essay through the use of lexical and grammatical devices: An analysis. International Journal of Research Studies in Education 14:10

Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka & Cheryl Lim

2023. Bikol clefts and topics and the Austronesian extraction restriction. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 41:3 ► pp. 911 ff.

Oxford, Will

2023. The Algonquian Inverse,

Brodkin, Dan

2022. Two steps to high absolutive syntax: Austronesian voice and agent focus in Mandar. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 31:4 ► pp. 465 ff.

Chen, Victoria

2022. When Philippine-type voice meets Indo-European-type voice: insights from Puyuma. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 31:4 ► pp. 517 ff.

Chen, Victoria

2025. The syntax of Philippine-type alignment: Insights from case-marking. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 43:3 ► pp. 1839 ff.

Wellstood, Zachary

2022. A relative clause analysis of event existential constructions in Aklanon. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7:1

Aldridge, Edith & Yuko Yanagida

2021. Two types of alignment change in nominalizations. Diachronica 38:3 ► pp. 314 ff.

Klimenko, Sergei

2020. A corpus study ofkasama‘companion’ in Tagalog. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 46:2 ► pp. 240 ff.

Teng, Stacy Fang-ching

2020. The three agent demoting prefixes (ki-, m-u-, kur-) in Katripul Puyuma. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 46:1 ► pp. 21 ff.

Collins, James N.

2019. Definiteness determined by syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 37:4 ► pp. 1367 ff.

Haude, Katharina

2019. Grammatical relations in Movima. In Argument Selectors [Typological Studies in Language, 123], ► pp. 213 ff.

Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Demena Travis

2017. The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity,

MITSUGI, SANAKO

2017. Incremental comprehension of Japanese passives: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm. Applied Psycholinguistics 38:4 ► pp. 953 ff.

Givón, T.

2016. Beyond structuralism. Studies in Language 40:3 ► pp. 681 ff.

Givón, T.

2018. On Understanding Grammar,

Aldridge, Edith

2015. A minimalist approach to the emergence of ergativity in Austronesian languages. Linguistics Vanguard 1:1 ► pp. 313 ff.

Cristofaro, Sonia

2009. Grammatical Categories and Relations: Universality vs. Language‐Specificity and Construction‐Specificity. Language and Linguistics Compass 3:1 ► pp. 441 ff.

Keenan, Edward L.

2009. Existential sentences in Tagalog: commentary on the paper by Joseph Sabbagh. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27:4 ► pp. 721 ff.

Richards, Norvin

2000. Another Look at Tagalog Subjects. In Formal Issues in Austronesian Linguistics [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 49], ► pp. 105 ff.

Manning, Christopher D. & Ivan A. Sag

1998. Argument Structure, Valence, and Binding. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 107 ff.

Ameka, Felix K.

1989. Review of Starosta (1988): The case for lexicase: An outline of lexicase grammatical theory. Studies in Language 13:2 ► pp. 506 ff.

[no author supplied]

2021. The Syntax of Information-Structural Agreement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 268],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.