Cover not available

In:A Layered Approach to Habitual Constructions
Edited by Sune Gregersen and Kees Hengeveld
[Typological Studies in Language 136] 2026
► pp. 202228

References (17)
References
Bisang, W. (1995). Verb serialization and converbs — differences and similarities. In M. Haspelmath and E. König (Eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective: Structure and meaning of adverbial verb forms — adverbial participles, gerunds (pp. 137–188). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chappell, H. (1992). Towards a typology of aspect in Sinitic languages. 境内语言暨语言学 [Chinese Languages and Linguistics], Vol. 1: 汉语方言 [Chinese Dialects], 1(1), 67–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, H., & Cuyckens, H. (2005). Pragmatic strengthening and the meaning of complement constructions: The case of like and love with the to-Infinitive. Journal of English Linguistics, 33(1), 3–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Endo, T., & Tao, H. (2009). From volition and enjoyment to habituality: The cases of ài “love to” and xǐhuān “like to”. In J. Z. Xing (Ed.), Studies of Chinese linguistics: Functional approaches (pp. 155–183). Hong Kong University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fan, X. (2017). 基于汉语方言的惯常范畴研究 [A study of the habitual-generic category with the evidence from Chinese dialects]. 当代语言学 [Contemporary Linguistics], 4, 561–590.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, H. (2018). Mirativity in Mandarin: The sentence-final particle le (了). Open Linguistics, 4(1), 589–607. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Sentence-final particles in Mandarin [Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam]. LOT.
(2025). From LIKE/LOVE to habitual: The case of mainland East and Southeast Asian languages. Linguistics, 63(1), 247–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fortuin, E., & de Wit, S. (this volume). The habitual construction byvalo in Russian. In S. Gregersen, & K. Hengeveld (Eds.), A layered approach to habitual constructions (pp. 266–308). John Benjamins.
Fortuin, E., & Fang, H. (forthc.). Perfective aspect in Chinese and Russian: Differences and similarities.
Gregersen, S., & Hengeveld, K. (this volume). A layered approach to habitual constructions: Introduction. In S. Gregersen, & K. Hengeveld (Eds.), A layered approach to habitual constructions (pp. 1–41). John Benjamins.
Hengeveld, K. (2017). A hierarchical approach to grammaticalization. In K. Hengeveld, H. Narrog, & H. Olbertz (Eds.), The grammaticalization of tense, aspect, modality, and evidentiality: A functional perspective (pp. 13–38). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, K., & Mackenzie, J. L. (2008). Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keizer, E. (2007). The lexical-grammatical dichotomy in Functional Discourse Grammar. ALFA: Revista de Linguística, 51(2), 189–212.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lamarre, C. (2005). 汉语里标注惯常动作的形式 [The encoding of HABITUAL in Chinese]. 现代中国语研究 [Contemporary Research in Modern Chinese], 7, 33–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lü, S. (2016). 现代汉语八百词 [800 words in Modern Chinese]. 商务印书馆 [The Commercial Press].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue