In:Caused Accompanied Motion: Bringing and taking events in a cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Anna Margetts, Sonja Riesberg and Birgit Hellwig
[Typological Studies in Language 134] 2022
► pp. 397–434
Events of caused accompanied motion in Qaqet and Dëne Sųłıné child language corpora
Published online: 25 May 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.134.14hel
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.134.14hel
Abstract
This chapter investigates the expression of directed caused accompanied motion (directed CAM) events in child language corpora of Qaqet (a Papuan language of Papua New Guinea) and Dëne Sųłıné (a Dene language of Canada). Both languages employ complex CAM expressions. The chapter briefly introduces the constructions, and then focuses on the expression of directed CAM events in child language and child-directed language. In both languages, the CAM construction appears late in child language: early Qaqet expressions consist predominantly of ground phrase elements, while early Dëne Sųłıné expressions consist predominantly of bare verb stems. The findings are related to a proposal by Slobin et al. (2010) on early expressions of caused motion in satellite-framed languages.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Setting the scene: The directed CAM expressions in Qaqet and Dëne Sųłıné
- 3.Directed CAM events
- 3.1Qaqet
- 3.1.1Intransitive motion verbs and their use in the CAM construction
- 3.1.2The CAM construction in child language (below age 6;4)
- 3.1.3Directed CAM expressions in early child language (below age 2;8)
- 3.1.4Child-directed language: Variation sets
- 3.2Dëne Sųłıné
- 3.2.1Handling verbs and the directed CAM construction
- 3.2.2Directed CAM expressions in child language
- 3.1Qaqet
- 4.Discussion and conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes Abbreviations References
References (24)
Ameka, F., & Essegbey, J. (2013). Serialising languages: Satellite-framed, verb-framed or neither. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 2(1), 19–38.
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N. J., Essegbey, J., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kita, S., Lüpke, F., & Ameka, F. (2007). Principles of event representation in language: The case of motion events. Language, 83(3), 495–532.
Cook, E.-D. (2004). A grammar of Dëne Sųłıné (Chipewyan). Winnipeg: Algonquian and Iroquoian Linguistics.
Croft, W. A., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W. B., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. (2010). Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In H. C. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar (pp. 201–235). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
ELAN (Version 5.0) [Computer software]. (2017). Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Retrieved from [URL]
Frye, H. (2019). Child-directed speech in Qaqet: A language of East New Britain, Papua New Guinea (Doctoral dissertation). Universität zu Köln, Cologne.
Kasyon, M. J. (1997). Dene (Chipewyan) language classification verbs. Prince Albert: Northern Canada Mission Distributors.
Kopecka, A., & Narasimhan, B. (Eds.). (2012). Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Küntay, A., & Slobin, D. I. (1996). Listening to a Turkish mother: Some puzzles for acquisition. In D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis, & J. Guo (Eds.), Social interaction, social context, and language: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp. 265–286). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
(2002). Putting interaction back into child language: Examples from Turkish. Psychology of Language and Communication, 6(1), 5–14.
Praat (Version 6.0.25) [Computer software]. (2017). P. Boersma & D. Weenin. Retrieved from [URL]
Rice, S. (1998). Giving and taking in Chipewyan: The semantics of THING-marking classificatory verbs. In J. Newman (Ed.), The linguistics of giving (pp. 97–134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Vol. 2. Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
(2006). What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickman & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Slobin, D. I., Bowerman, M., Brown, P., Eisenbeiß, S., & Narasimhan, B. (2010). Putting things in places: Developmental consequences of linguistic typology. In J. Bohnemeyer & E. Pederson (Eds.), Event representation in language and cognition (pp. 134–165). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Vol. 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17(1), 480–519.
(2009). Main verb properties and equipollent framing. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 389–402). Hove: Psychology Press.
Toolbox (Version 1.6.2) [Computer software]. (2017). SIL International. Retrieved from [URL]
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Wegdell, Franziska, Caroline Fryns, Johanna Schick, Lara Nellissen, Marion Laporte, Martin Surbeck, Maria A. van Noordwijk, Shelly Masi, Birgit Hellwig, Erik P. Willems, Klaus Zuberbühler, Carel P. van Schaik, Sabine Stoll & Simon W. Townsend
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
