Cover not available

In:Caused Accompanied Motion: Bringing and taking events in a cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Anna Margetts, Sonja Riesberg and Birgit Hellwig
[Typological Studies in Language 134] 2022
► pp. 243–271

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Caused accompanied motion constructions in Vera’a

 | Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg  | University of Zurich
Published online: 25 May 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.134.09sch
Abstract
The expression of bring and take events (so-called ‘caused accompanied motion (CAM)’ events) in the Oceanic language Vera’a (North Vanuatu) is analysed in terms of lexical and constructional compositionality. The two lexical verbs centrally involved in CAM expressions have fairly general semantic content not specific to CAM events, meaning ‘move sth.’ and ‘accompany’. These are used in constructional frames with dative and locative prepositions, serialization with verbs of motion, and directional adverbs and particles. Such constructions can then yield a CAM reading. However, they can also receive a non-CAM reading, so that the verbalisation of CAM events is ultimately a matter of pragmatic inference in Vera’a and never unambiguously encoded. Different verbs are used to specify manner of handling themes, and manner of motion as well as direction can be incorporated in motion verbs in initial position of verb serialization (satellite-framed).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background: Basic clause structure and expressions of motion
    • 2.1Vera’a basic clause structure
    • 2.2Data on directed CAM expressions in Vera’a
  • 3.Lexical and constructional elements in the expression of CAM events
    • 3.1The verb ‘ō’ ‘be with’ and its prepositional equivalent
    • 3.2The verb le ‘move’
    • 3.3Locative and dative PPs
    • 3.4Directional adverbs, verbs and particles
  • 4.Caused accompanied motion constructions and their variants
    • 4.1Accompany
      • 4.1.1Motion + accompany + trajectory / goal constructions with CAM reading
      • 4.1.2Motion + accompany + trajectory / goal constructions with variable reading
      • 4.1.3Accompany + trajectory and/or location
    • 4.2Move
  • 5.Manner-specific CAM verbs
    • 5.1Carry verbs
    • 5.2Push and pull verbs
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (20)
References
Chafe, W. (1980). The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durie, M. (1988). Verb serialization and “verbal-prepositions” in Oceanic languages. Oceanic Linguistics, 27(1/2), 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
François, A. (2015). The ins and outs of up and down: Disentangling the nine geocentric space systems of Torres and Banks languages. In A. François, S. Lacrampe, M. Franjieh, & S. Schnell (Eds.), The languages of Vanuatu: Unity and diversity (pp. 137–195). Canberra: Asia Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, B. (2008). Dative verbs: A crosslinguistic perspective. Lingvisticæ Investigationes: Revue Internationale de Linguistique Française et de Linguistique Générale, 31(2), 285–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. P. (2006). Patterns in the data: Towards a semantic typology of spatial description. In S. C. Levinson & D. P. Wilkins (Eds.), Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity (pp. 512–552). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malchukov, A., Haspelmath, M., & Comrie, B. (2010). Ditransitive constructions: A typological overview. In A. Malchukov, M. Haspelmath, & B. Comrie (Eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions: A comparative handbook (pp. 1–64). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Margetts, A. (2004). From implicature to construction: Emergence of a benefactive construction in Oceanic. Oceanic Linguistics, 43(2), 445–468. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Three-participant events in Oceanic languages. Oceanic Linguistics, 46(1), 71–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Margetts, A., Austin, P. (2007). Three-participant events in the languages of the world: towards a crosslinguistic typology. Linguistics, 45(3), 393–451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newman, J. (Ed.). (1998). The linguistics of giving. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pawley, A. (2006). Where have all the verbs gone? Remarks on the organisation of languages with small, closed verb classes. 11th Biennial Rice University Linguistics Symposium.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rappaport-Hovav, M., & Levin, B. (2008). The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics, 44, 129–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
San Roque, L., Gawne, L., Hoenigman, D., Miller, J. C., Rumsey, A., Spronck, S., Carroll, A., & Evans, N. (2012). Getting the story straight: Language fieldwork using a narrative problem-solving task. Language Documentation and Conservation, 6, 135–174.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schnell, S. (2011). A grammar of Vera’a, an Oceanic language from North Vanuatu. Kiel: University of Kiel. Retrieved from [URL]
(2012). Referential hierarchies in three-participant constructions in Vera’a. Linguistic Discovery, 10(3). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schnell, S., Vorēs, M., Hope, C., Atkins, G., Atkins, J., & Malau, A. (2006). Vera’a corpus. DobeS programme. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Senft, G. (Ed.). (2004a). Deixis and demonstratives in Oceanic languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004b). Introduction. In G. Senft (Ed.), Deixis and demonstratives in Oceanic languages (pp. 1–13). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Vol. 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Margetts, Anna, Katharina Haude, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, Dagmar Jung, Sonja Riesberg, Stefan Schnell, Frank Seifart, Harriet Sheppard & Claudia Wegener
2022. Cross-linguistic patterns in the lexicalisation of bring and take. Studies in Language 46:4 ► pp. 934 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue