In:The Typology of Physical Qualities
Edited by Ekaterina Rakhilina, Tatiana Reznikova and Daria Ryzhova
[Typological Studies in Language 133] 2022
► pp. 189–214
Chapter 7A new approach to old studies
Published online: 25 May 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.133.07vyr
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.133.07vyr
Abstract
This chapter gives a description of the old terms typology across 78 world languages. The sample size in the research is relatively big, as compared to the other studies in this volume, which is attributable to two main reasons: the semantics of old terms has already been thoroughly described for at least two languages – English and Russian – and the lexemes with this meaning are in most cases featured by bilingual dictionaries. On the basis of the dictionary data supported by additional expertise we propose a semantic map of the OLD domain. The paper also outlines some cross-linguistically recurrent colexification patterns and addresses the specificity of homonymous combinations of old attributes with different semantic classes of nouns.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Semantics of old
- 3.Data
- 4.Typological results
- 5.Dominant systems
- 5.1Polysemy across frames
- 5.2Dominant lexeme and its quasi-synonyms
- 6.Subframes
- 6.1‘Old person’: Oldness as a gradual property
- 6.2‘Old person’: Gender opposition
- 6.3‘Old person’: Speaking of children
- 6.4‘Old person’ vs. ‘old oak’
- 7.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes Abbreviations References Appendix
References (15)
Beard, R. 1991. Decompositional composition: the semantics of scope ambiguities and ‘bracketing paradoxes’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 195–229.
Corbett, G. 2013. Sex-based and Non-sex-based Gender Systems. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, <[URL]> (6 April 2020).
Dixon, R. B. 1912. Maidu texts. Publications of the American Ethnological Society 4. Leiden: Brill Publishers.
Georgakopoulos, T. & Polis, S. 2018. The semantic map model: State of the art and future avenues for linguistic research. Language and Linguistics Compass 12(2): 1–33.
Haspelmath, M. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In The New Psychology of Language, M. Tomasello (ed), 211–242. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hellinger, M. & Bussmann, H. (eds). 2001. Gender Across Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Maisak, T. & Rakhilina, E. (eds). 2007. Glagoly dviženija v vode: leksičeskaja tipologija. [Verbs of Aqua-Motion: Lexical Typology]. Moskva: Indrik.
[OED]: Simpson, J. A. & Weiner, E. S. C. (eds). 1989. The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rakhilina, E. 1999. Aspectual classification of nouns: A case study of Russian. In Tense-aspect, transitivity and causativity, A. Werner & L. Kulikov (eds), 341–350. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rakhilina, E. & Reznikova, T. 2016. A Frame-based methodology for lexical typology. In The Lexical Typology of Semantic Shifts, P. Juvonen & M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), 95–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rakhilina, E. V., Ryzhova, D. A. & Badryzlova, Yu. G. In press. Lexical typology and semantic maps: perspectives and challenges. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.