In:The Typology of Physical Qualities
Edited by Ekaterina Rakhilina, Tatiana Reznikova and Daria Ryzhova
[Typological Studies in Language 133] 2022
► pp. 1–28
Chapter 1Introduction
The frame-based approach to the typology of qualities
Published online: 25 May 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.133.01rak
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.133.01rak
Abstract
The chapter outlines the goals of our project, points out the aspects that distinguish the vocabulary of qualities from other lexical domains, when viewed from a typological perspective, and introduces the methods of data collection and analysis we use in this project and in other related studies. It goes on to discuss the semantic parameters that motivate the lexical oppositions in various qualitative domains.
Keywords: lexical typology, physical qualities, metaphor, frame, evaluation, perception
Article outline
- 1.Subject of this book
- 2.Methodology
- 3.Language samples
- 4.Data selection
- 5.Lexical oppositions in qualities
- 5.1Taxonomy and mereology
- 5.2Topology
- 5.3Number of arguments
- 5.4Evaluation
- 5.5Type of perception
- 6.Metaphoric shifts
- 7.Conclusion
Notes References
References (89)
Ameka, F. K. & Levinson, S. C. (eds). 2007. The typology and semantics of locative predication: Posturals, positionals and other beasts [Special Issue]. Linguistics 45(5).
Baroni, M., Bernardi, R. & Zamparelli, R. 2014. Frege in Space: A program for compositional distributional semantics. Linguistic Issues in Language Technologies 9: 5–110.
Berlin, B. & Kay, P. 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Bierwisch, M. 1967. Some semantic universals of German adjectival. Foundations of Language 3(1): 1–36.
Bierwisch, M. & Lang, E. 1989. Dimensional Adjectives: Grammatical Structure and Conceptual Interpretation. Berlin: Springer.
Britsyn, V. M., Rakhilina, E. V., Reznikova, T. I. & Javorska, G. M. (eds). 2009. Koncept BOL’ v tipologičeskom osveščenii [The Concept of PAIN in a Typological Perspective]. Kiev: Dmitri Burago’s Publishing House.
Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect: an Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cysouw, M. & Wälchli, B. (eds). 2007. Parallel Texts. Using Translational Equivalents in Linguistic Typology. Theme Issue. Sprachtypologie & Universalienforschung (STUF) 60(2).
Dingemanse, M. & Majid, A. 2012. The semantic structure of sensory vocabulary in an African language. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, N. Miyake, D. Peebles & R. P. Cooper (eds), 300–305. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Driagina-Hasko, V. & Perelmutter, R. (eds). 2010. New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion [Studies in Language Companion Series 115]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Evans, N. & Wilkins, D. P. 2000. In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76: 546–592.
Fillmore, Ch. J. 1976. Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech, vol. 280: 20–32.
François, A. 2008. Semantic maps and the typology of colexification: Intertwining polysemous networks across languages. In From Polysemy to Semantic Change, M. Vanhove (ed), 163–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Georgakopoulos, Th. & Polis, S. 2018. The semantic map model: State of the art and future avenues for linguistic research. Language and Linguistics Compass 12(2): 1–33.
Goddard, C. 2012. Semantic primes, semantic molecules, semantic templates: Key concepts in the NSM approach to lexical typology. Linguistics 50(3): 711–743.
Goddard, C. & Wierzbicka, A. 2007. NSM analyses of the semantics of physical qualities: sweet, hot, hard, heavy, rough, sharp in crosslinguistic perspective. Studies in Language 31(4): 765–800.
Hardin, C. L. & Maffi, L. (eds). 1997. Color Categories in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In The New Psychology of Language, vol. 2, M. Tomasello (ed), 211–242. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kashkin, E. V. 2010. Semantika glagolov razdelenija ob’’ekta na časti v èrzjanskom i komi-zyrjanskom jazykax (prjamye i perenosnye upotreblenija) [Semantics of verbs of cutting and breaking in Erzya and Komi-Zyryan (basic and derived meanings)]. Diploma paper, Moscow State University.
Kibrik, A. E. 1998. Does intragenetic typology make sense? In Sprache in Raum und Zeit: Beiträge zur empirischen Sprachwissenshaft, W. Boeder, Ch. Schroeder, K. H. Wagner & W. Wildgen (eds), 61–68. Tübingen: Narr.
2009. In defence of intragenetic typology: evidence from clause coordination in Daghestanian languages. In Eighth Biennial Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology. Abstracts. <[URL]> (26 March 2021).
Koch, P. 2008. Cognitive onomasiology and lexical change: around the eye. In From Polysemy to Semantic Change, M. Vanhove (ed), 107–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kopecka, A. & Narasimhan, B. (eds). 2012. Events of Putting and Taking: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (ed). 2015. The Linguistics of Temperature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M., Divjak, D. & Rakhilina, E. 2010. Aquamotion verbs in Slavic and Germanic: A case study in lexical typology. In New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion, V. Driagina-Hasko & R. Perelmutter (eds), 315–341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. & Rakhilina, E. V. 1999. S samymi teplymi čuvstvami (po gorjačim sledam Stokgol’mskoj èkspedicii) [With warmest regards (hot on the heels of the field trip to Stockholm)]. In Tipologija i teorija jazyka. Ot opisanija k ob’’jasneniju. K 60-letiju A. E. Kibrika [Typology and Linguistic Theory. From Description to Explanation. For the 60th Birthday of A. E. Kibrik], E. V. Rakhilina & Ya. G. Testelets (eds), 462–487. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. & Rakhilina, E. 2006. «Some like it hot»: on semantics of temperature adjectives in Russian and Swedish. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 59(2): 253–269.
Kruglyakova, V. A. 2010. Semantika glagolov vraščenija v tipologičeskoj perspektive [Semantics of rotation verbs in a typological perspective]. Ph.D. dissertation, Russian State University for the Humanities.
Lander, Yu., Maisak, T. & Rakhilina, E. 2012. Verbs of aquamotion: semantic domains and lexical systems. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, M. Vulchanova & E. van der Zee (eds), 67–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lang, E. 2002. Spatial dimension terms. In Language Typology and Language Universals, M. Haspelmath & E. König (eds), 1251–1275. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Lehrer, A. 1974. Semantic Fields and Lexical Structure. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Levinson, S. C. 2000. Yélî Dnye and the theory of basic color terms. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 10(1): 3–55.
Levinson, S. C. & Majid, A. 2014. Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind & Language 29: 407–427.
Luchina, E. S., Reznikova, T. I. & Stenin, I. A. 2013. Atributivy kak istočnik grammatikalizacii: ‘prjamoj’ i ‘rovnyj’ v russkom, nemeckom i finskom jazykah [Attributives as a source for grammaticalization: ‘straight’ and ‘even’ in Russin, German and Finnish]. In Tipología léxica, R. Guzmán Tirado & I. Votyakova (eds), 203–209. Granada: Jizo Ediciones.
Luchina, E. S. & Nanij, L. O. 2016. Puti grammatikalizacii leksem so značeniem ‘prjamoj’ [‘Straight’ and its synonyms: paths of grammaticalization in the attributive lexeme]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana 12(1): 574–587.
MacLaury, R. E. 1997. Color and Cognition in Mesoamerica: Constructing Categories as Vantages. Austin: University of Texas Press.
MacLaury, R. E., Paramei, G. V. & Dedrick, D. (eds). 2007. Anthropology of Color: Interdisciplinary Multilevel Modeling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Maisak, T. A. & Rakhilina, E. V. (eds). 2007. Glagoly dviženija v vode: leksičeskaja tipologija [Verbs of AQUA-Motion: a Lexical Typology]. Moscow: Indrik.
Majid, A. 2015. Comparing lexicons cross-linguistically. In The Oxford Handbook of the Word, J. R. Taylor (ed), 364–379. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2021. Human Olfaction at the Intersection of Language, Culture, and Biology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 25(2): 111–123.
Majid, A. & Bowerman, M. (eds). 2007. Cutting and breaking events: A crosslinguistic perspective [Special Issue]. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2).
Majid, A. & Levinson, S. C. 2007. The language of vision I: colour. In Field Manual Volume 10, A. Majid (ed), 22–25. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Majid, A., Senft, G. & Levinson, S. C. 2007. The language of olfaction. In Field Manual Volume 10, A. Majid (ed), 36–41. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Majid, A., Gullberg, M., van Staden, M. & Bowerman, M. 2007. How similar are semantic categories in closely related languages? A comparison of cutting and breaking in four Germanic languages. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 179–194.
Newman, J. (ed). 1998. The Linguistics of Giving [Studies in Typological Linguistics 36]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(ed). 2002. The Linguistics of Sitting, Standing, and Lying [Studies in Typological Linguistics 51]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(ed). 2009. The Linguistics of Eating and Drinking [Studies in Typological Linguistics 84]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Partee, B. 1995. Lexical semantics and compositionality. In An Invitation to Cognitive Science (Second Edition). Volume 1: Language, L. Gleitman & M. Liberman (eds), 311–360. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Peirsman, Y. & Geeraerts, D. (2006). Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics 17(3): 269–316.
Radden, G. & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In Metonymy in Language and Thought [Human Cognitive Processing 4], K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (eds), 17–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rakhilina, E. V. 2000. Kognitivnyj analiz predmentyx imen: semantika i sočetaemost’ [Cognitive Analysis of Concrete Nouns: Semantics and Combinability]. Moscow: Russkie slovari.
2007. Tipy metaforičeskix upotreblenij glagolov plavanija [Types of metaphorical uses of aqua-motion verbs]. In Glagoly dviženija v vode: leksičeskaja tipologija [Verbs of AQUA-Motion: a Lexical Typology], T. A. Maisak & E. V. Rakhilina (eds), 76–105. Moscow: Indrik.
Rakhilina, E. 2010. Verbs of rotation in Russian and Polish. In New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion, V. Driagina-Hasko & R. Perelmutter (eds), 291–316. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rakhilina, E. V. & Lemmens, M. 2003. Rusistika i tipologiya: leksičeskaja semantika glagolov so značeniem ‘sidet’’ v russkom i niderlandskom [Russian studies and typology: lexical semantics of verbs meaning ‘to sit’ in Russian and Dutch]. Russian Linguistics 27(3): 313–328.
Rakhilina, E. V. & Reznikova, T. I. 2016. A Frame-based methodology for lexical typology. In The Lexical Typology of Semantic Shifts, P. Juvonen & M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), 95–129. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Rakhilina, E. V., Reznikova, T. I., Ryzhova, D. A. (eds). 2020. Tipologija glagolov padenija [Typology of verbs of falling] [Special issue]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana 16(1).
Reznikova, T., Rakhilina, E. & Bonch-Osmolovskaya, A. 2012. Towards a typology of pain predicates. Linguistics 50(3): 421–465.
Ryzhova, D., Rakhilina, E. & Kholkina, L. 2019. Approaching perceptual qualities: the case of heavy. In Perception Metaphors, L. J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque & A. Majid (eds), 185–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Shayan, S., Ozturk, O. & Sicoli, M. A. 2011. The thickness of pitch: Crossmodal metaphors in Farsi, Turkish, and Zapotec. The Senses and Society 6(1): 96–105.
Speed, L. J., O’Meara, C., San Roque, L. & Majid, A. (eds). 2019. Perception Metaphors. 185–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sweetser, E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. 1983. How language structures space. In Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application, H. L. Pick & L. P. Acredolo (eds), 225–282. New York: Plenum Press.
Vanhove, M. 2008. Semantic associations between sensory modalities, prehension and mental perceptions: A crosslinguistic perspective. In From Polysemy to Semantic Change, M. Vanhove (ed), 342–370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Viberg, Å. 1984. The verbs of perception: a typological study. In Explanations for Language Universals, B. Butterworth, B. Comrie & Ö. Dahl (eds), 123–162. Berlin: Mouton.
. 1999. The polysemous cognates Swedish gå and English go. Universal and language-specific characteristics. Languages in Contrast 2: 89–115.
. 2008. Riding, driving and traveling: Swedish verbs describing motion in a vehicle in crosslinguistic perspective. In Resourceful Language Technology: Festschrift in Honor of Anna Sågvall Hein, J. Nivre, M. Dahllöf & B. Megyesi (eds), 173–201. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
. 2013. Posture verbs: A multilingual contrastive study. Languages in Contrast 13(2): 139–169.
Waag, A. 1901. Bedeutungsentwicklung unseres Wortschatzes. Auf Grund von Hermann Pauls “Deutschem Wörterbuch” in den Haupterscheinungen dargestellt. Lahr i.B.: M. Schauenburg.
Wälchli, B. & Cysouw, M. 2012. Lexical Typology through Similarity Semantics: Toward a semantic map of motion verbs. Linguistics 50(3): 671–710.
1988. The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2006. Shape in Grammar revisited. Studies in Language 30(1): 115–177.
Wilkins, D. P. 1996. Natural tendencies of semantic change and the search for cognates. In The Comparative Method Reviewed. Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change, M. Durie & M. Ross (eds), 264–304. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zalizniak, Anna A. 2008. A Catalogue of Semantic Shifts: towards a Typology of Semantic Derivation. In From Polysemy to Semantic Change, M. Vanhove (ed), 217–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
