In:Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology
Edited by Luca Alfieri, Giorgio Francesco Arcodia and Paolo Ramat
[Typological Studies in Language 132] 2021
► pp. 389–410
Chapter 11The category ‘pronoun’ in East and Southeast Asian languages, with a focus on Japanese
Published online: 9 July 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.132.11dam
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.132.11dam
The topic of the paper is an analysis of the debated notion of the category ‘pronoun’ in East and Southeast Asian languages, with a special focus on Japanese. After a description of the main aspects of the notion of ‘person’ as a grammatical category, the focus is devoted to personal pronouns in general and then to personal pronouns in East and Southeast Asian languages. Special attention is devoted to Japanese personal pronouns, taking into account the Emancipatory Pragmatics approach.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Person as a grammatical category
- 3.Personal pronouns
- 4.Pronouns in East and South-East Asian languages
- 4.1A focus on Japanese pronouns
- 4.2Korean pronouns
- 5.Ellipsis
- 6.Towards an emancipatory pragmatics
- 7.Conclusion
Abbreviations References
References (53)
Azuma, Shoji. 2000. Linguistic strategy of involvement: An emergence of new political speech in Japan. In
Beyond Public Speech and Symbols: Explorations in the Rethoric of Politicians and the Media, Christ’l
De Landtsheer & Ofer
Feldman
(eds), 69–85. Westport CT: Praeger.
Bachnik, Jane. 1998. Time, space and person in Japanese relationships. In
Interpreting Japanese Society, Joy
Hendry
(ed.), 91–116. London: Routledge.
Becker, Alton & I Gusti Ngurah, Oka. 1974. Person in Kawi: Exploration of an elementary semantic dimension. Oceanic Linguistics
13: 229–255.
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.
Benveniste, Émile. 1971[1958]. Subjectivity in language. In
Problens in General Linguistics, 223–230. Coral Gables FL: University of Miami Press.
Cassirer, Ernst. 195 [1923]. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Vol.1: Language. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
Cooke, Joseph R.
1968. Pronominal Reference in Thai, Burmese and Vietnamese. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Da Milano, Federica. 2012. Classificazione tipologico-linguistica del giapponese in sincronia. In
Introduzione allo studio della lingua giapponese, Andrea
Maurizi
(ed.), 43–84. Roma: Carocci Editore.
. 2018. La soggettività linguistica: Un’analisi in prospettiva tipologica. In
Tipologia, acquisizione, grammaticalizzazione, Marina
Chini & Pierluigi
Cuzzolin
(eds), 51–62. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Da Milano, Federica & Jungbluth, Konstanze. To appear. Address systems and social markers. In
Cambridge Handbook of Romance Lingustics, Adam
Ledgeway & Martin
Maiden
(eds). Cambridge: CUP.
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives. Form, Function and Grammaticalization [Typlogical Studies in Language 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Diller, Anthony. 1994. Thai. In
Semantic and Lexical Universals. Theory and Empirical Findings, Cliff
Goddard & Anna
Wierzbicka
(eds), 149–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ebi, Martina. 2015. Encoding deictic relations in Japanese. In
Manual of Deixis in Romance Languages, Konstanze
Jungbluth & Federica
Da Milano
(eds), 597–610. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Fuji, Yoko. 2012. Differences of situating self in the place/ba of interaction between the Japanese and American English speakers. Journal of Pragmatics
44: 636–662.
Hanks, William. 1990. Referential Practice. Language and Lived Space among the Maya. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hanks, William, Ide, Sachiko & Katagiri, Yasuhiro. 2009. Towards an emancipatory pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics
41(1): 1–9.
Hanks, William, Ide, Sachiko, Katagiri, Yasuhiro, Saft, Scott, Fujii, Yoko & Ueno, Kishiko. 2019. Communicative interactions in terms of ba theory. Towards an innovative approach to language practice. Journal of Pragmatics
145: 63–71.
. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language
86: 663–687.
Heine, Bernd & Song, Kyung-An. 2010. On the genesis of personal pronouns: Some conceptual sources. Language and Cognition
2(1): 117–147.
Helmbrecht, Johannes. 2004. Personal Pronouns. Form, Function, and Grammaticalization. Habilitationschrift, Erfurt Universität.
von Humboldt, W.
1826. Notice sur la grammaire japonaise du P. Oyanguren. Paris: Librairie Orientale de Dondey-Dupré père et fils.
Ishiyama, Osamu. 2019. Diachrony of Personal Pronouns in Japanese. A Functional and Cross-linguistic Perspective [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 344]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2013. Japanese [London Oriental and African Language Library 17]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Koh, Ann Sweesun. 1990. Topics in Colloquial Malay. PhD dissertation, The University of Melbourne.
Kuno, Susumu. 1972. Pronominalization, reflexivization, and direct discourse. Linguistic Inquiry
3: 161–195.
. 2004. Empathy and direct discourse perspectives. In
The Handbook of Pragmatics, Laurence R.
Horn & Gregory L.
Ward
(eds), 315–343. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1967. Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language. New York NY: Garland.
. 2018. Linguistic concepts and categories in language description. In
Tipologia, acquisizione, grammaticalizzazione. Typology, Acquisition, Grammaticalization Studies, Marina
Chini & Pierluigi
Cuzzolin
(eds), 27–50. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Mosby Irgens, Benedicte. 2017. Person Deixis in Japanese and English. A Constrastive Functional Analysis. PhD dissertation, University of Bergen.
Otsuka, Masayuki. 2011. On ba theory. Paper presented for the lecture on ba theory at the 2011 Tokyo Workshop on Emancipatory Pragmatics. Ms.
Quinn, Charles J.
1994.
Uchi/soto: Tip of a semiotic iceberg? ‘Inside’ and ‘outside’ knowledge in the grammar of Japanese. In
Situated Meaning. Inside and Outside in Japanese Self, Society and Language, Jane M.
Bachnik & Charles J.
QuinnJr. (eds), 247–294. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Shibasaki, Reijirou. 2005. Personal Pronouns and Argument Structure in Japanese: Discourse Frequency, Diachrony and Typology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Song, Kyung-An. 2002. Korean reflexives and grammaticalization: A speaker-hearer dynamic approach. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung
55(4): 340–353.
Sugamoto, Nobuko. 1989. Pronominality: A noun-pronoun continuum. In
Linguistic Categorization, [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 61], Roberta
Corrigan, Fred
Eckman & Michael
Noonan
(eds), 267–291. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Suzuki, Takao. 1978. Words in Context. A Japanese Perspective on Language and Culture. Tokyo: Kodansha International.
Whitman, John. 1999. Personal pronoun shift in Japanese. A case study in lexical change and point of view. In
Function and Structure. In Honour of Susumu Kuno [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 59], Akio
Kamio & Ken-Ichi
Takami
(eds.), 357–386. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yamaguchi, Yoshinori. 1985. Kodai nihongo bumpoo no seiritsu no kenkyuu [Studies in the birth of old Japanese grammar]. Tokyo: Yuseido.
Yamamoto, Mutsumi. 1999. Animacy and Reference. A Cognitive Approaxh to Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 46]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich
2021. Theories of language, language comparison, and grammatical description. In Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology [Typological Studies in Language, 132], ► pp. 137 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
