Cover not available

In:Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology
Edited by Luca Alfieri, Giorgio Francesco Arcodia and Paolo Ramat
[Typological Studies in Language 132] 2021
► pp. 101–136

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 4
Typology of functional domains

 | University of Colorado
Published online: 9 July 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.132.04fra
The aim of this study is to advocate one of the aims of linguistic typology, viz. the discovery of how languages are similar or different with respect to the functions they encode and consequently for the development of a typology based solely on the functions encoded in the grammatical systems of individual languages. Such a typology has the advantage of not requiring or depending on aprioristic definitions. Such a typology also has the following additional advantages: it can serve as a tool in explaining the forms of utterances in individual languages and in explaining why certain languages have functions that other languages do not.
Article outline
  • 1.Aims of typology
  • 2.Approaches to the study of functional categories
  • 3.Problems with conceptual frameworks (comparative concepts)
  • 4.Current approaches to the discovery of functions
  • 5.Theoretical foundations for a non-aprioristic description of functions
  • 6.Discovery of the function of a linguistic form
    • 6.1The prerequisites for the discovery of functions
    • 6.2Two types of functions in the present approach
      • 6.2.1Relationship between functions as a main discovery tool
  • 7.The basic questions in the cross-linguistic study of functions
  • 8.Proposed object of typology of functions
  • 9.Point of view
    • 9.1Point of view of the subject as a marked category
    • 9.2Point of view of the subject as unmarked category
    • 9.3Goal orientation
    • 9.4Point of view of the subject and goal orientation in Hdi
  • 10.Locative predication
  • 11.Benefactive, malefactive, and the indirect object
    • 11.1Benefactive function
    • 11.2Indirectly affected argument
    • 11.3Conclusions
  • 12.Advantages of comparing functions encoded in the grammatical systems
  • 13.What the typology of functional functions will look like
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (76)
References
Beeching, Kate. 1980–1990. Un corpus d’entretiens spontanés. Enregistrés et transcrits par Kate Beeching. Southampton: LLAS Centre for Languages, University of Southampton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
COCA: Corpus of Contemporary American English.
Cohen, David. 1989. L’aspect verbal. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. Number. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuyckens, Herbert , Davidse, Kristin & Verstraete, Jean-Christophe (eds.). 2010. Grammaticalization and grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 2010. Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 1: Methodology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 2: Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 3: Further Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1991. SOV languages and the OV: VO typology. Journal of Linguistics 27: 443–482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68(1): 81–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995. Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order. In Word Order in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 30], Michael Noonan & Pamela Downing (eds), 105–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013a. Definite articles. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (28 May 2017).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013b. Indefinite articles. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (28 May 2017).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud. 1989. Word frequency and word order in freezes. Linguistics 27(3): 517–556. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud & Fenk, August. 2005. Crosslinguistic correlations between size of syllables, number of cases, and adposition order. In Sprache und Natürlichkeit: Gedenkband für Willi Mayerthaler, Gertraud Fenk-Oczlon & Christian Winkler (eds), 75–86. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1968. The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, Emmon Bach & Richard, Harms (eds), 1–88. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael, Mithun, Marianne & Evans, Nicholas (eds). 2017. The Oxford Handbook of Polysynthesis. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1985a. Ergativity, number, and agreement. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Mary Niepokuj, Mary VanClay, Vassiliki Nikiforidou & Deborah Feder (eds), 96–106. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985b. Truth and the indicative sentence. Studies in Language 9(2): 243–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Grammaticalization of the Complex Sentence: A Case Study in Chadic [Studies in Language Companion Series 32]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Grammaticalization of number: From demonstratives to nominal and verbal plural. Linguistic Typology 1: 193–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Domains of point of view and coreferentiality: System interaction approach to the study of reflexives. In Reflexives: Forms and Functions, Vol.1 [Typological Studies in Language 40], Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci Walker (eds), 125–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. A Grammar of Lele [Stanford Monographs in African Linguistics]. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Principle of functional transparency in language structure and language change. In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories [Studies in Language Companion Series 72], Zygmunt Frajzyngier, David Rood & Adam Hodges (eds), 259–283. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008a. A Grammar of Gidar. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008b. Grammaticalization, typology, and semantics: Expanding the agenda. In Rethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 76], Maria Jose Lopez-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds), 61–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Grammaticalization within and outside of the domain. In Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research [Typological Studies in Language 94], An Van linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete & Kristin Davidse (eds), 43–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Grammaticalization of the reference systems. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 625–635. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. A Grammar of Wandala. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Indirect object and benefactive predications in Chadic: A typological sketch. Studies in African Linguistics 42(1): 33–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Inflectional markers of sentential parsing. Lingua 183: 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018a. Toward a typology of reference systems. Languages and Linguistics 79: 1–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018b. Coding locative predication in Chadic. In Afroasiatic: Data and Perspectives [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 339], Alessandro Mengozzi & Mauro Tosco (eds), 203–233. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. What the grammaticalization of ‘head’ reveals about the semantic structure of a language. In Embodiment in Cross-Linguistic Studies: The ‘Head’, Iwona Kraska-Szlenk (ed.), 51–75. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Butters, Marielle. 2020. The Emergence of Grammatical Functions. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt, Johnston, Eric, with Edwards, Adrian. 2005. A Grammar of Mina. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt, Liu, Meichun, Ye, Yingying. 2020. The reference system of Modern Mandarin Chinese. Australian Journal of Linguistics 40(1).
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Mycielski, Jan. 1998. On some fundamental problems of mathematical linguistics. In Mathematical and Computational Analysis of Natural Language [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 45], Carlos Martin-Vide (ed.), 295–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt with Shay, Erin. 2002. A Grammar of Hdi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt with Erin Shay. 2003. Explaining Language Structure through Systems Interaction [Typological Studies in Language 55]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. The Role of Functions in Syntax: A Unified Approach to Language Theory, Description, and Typology [Typological Studies in Language 111]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Munkaila, Mohammed. In progress. Locative predications in Hausa.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. n.d. Field-notes on Hona.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Johnston, Eric. n.d. Field-notes for Mina dictionary.
Garrigues-Cresswell, Martine with Weibegué, Christophe. 1981. Livre de Lecture Lélé. Sarh: Centre D’études Linguistiques.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. & van der Auwera, Johan. 2012. This is to count as a construction. Folia Linguistica 46(1): 109–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, Gilles Gaston. 1960. Pensée Formelle et Science de l’Homme. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Grammar, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine. 2016. Associated motion in South America: Typological and areal perspectives. Linguistic Typology 20(1): 81–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86(3): 663–687. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15(3): 535–556. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang & Perdue, Clive. 1997. The Basic Variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 13(4): 301–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Heine, Bernd, Hong, Bo, Long, Haiping, Narrog, Heiko & Rhee, Seongha (eds) 2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, second, extensively revised and updated edition. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert. 2004. On the status of linguistics with particular regard to typology. The Linguistic Review 21: 389–411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Margetts, Anna & Austin, Peter K. 2007. Three-participant events in the languages of the world: Towards a crosslinguistic typology. Linguistics 45(3): 393–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milewski, Tadeusz. 1950. La structure de la phrase dans les langues indigènes de l’Amérique du nord. Lingua Posnaniensis 2: 162–207.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1962. Typological similarities between Caucasian and American Indian languages. Folia Orientalia IV: 221–230.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1991. Active/agentive case and its motivations. Language 67: 510–546. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne & Chafe, Wallace. 1999. What are S, A, and O? Studies in Language 23(3): 579–606. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newman, Paul. 2000. The Hausa Language: An Encyclopedic Reference Grammar. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
NKJP: Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego-Polish National Corpus.
Radetzky, Paula & Smith, Tomoko. 2010. An areal and cross-linguistic study of benefactive and malefactive constructions. In Benefactives and Malefactives. Typological Perspectives and Case Studies [Typological Studies in Language 92], Fernando Zúñiga & Seppo Kittilä (eds), 97–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul & Otanes, Fe T. 1972. Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schuh, Russell G. 2017. A Chadic Cornucopia, Paul Newman (ed.). Oakland CA: California Digital Library. <[URL]> (12 November 2020).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2006. Word order and linearization. In Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics, Vol. 13, Keith Brown (ed.), 642–649. Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Variation in major constituent order: A global and European perspective. In Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe, Anna Siewierska (ed.), 475–552. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Person. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna & Bakker, Dik. 1996. The distribution of subject and object agreement and word order type. Studies in Language 20(1): 115–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanini, Jean. 1962. La voix pronominale en ancien et en moyen français. Aix-en-Provence: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1963. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wohlgemuth, Jan & Cysouw, Michael (eds). 2010. Rara & Rarissima. Documenting the Fringes of Linguistic Diversity. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Frajzyngier, Zygmunt
2025. Locative Predications in Chadic Languages, DOI logo
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich
2021. Theories of language, language comparison, and grammatical description. In Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology [Typological Studies in Language, 132], ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue