In:The Linguistics of Olfaction: Typological and Diachronic Approaches to Synchronic Diversity
Edited by Łukasz Jędrzejowski and Przemysław Staniewski
[Typological Studies in Language 131] 2021
► pp. 305–342
Alternating smell in Modern Hebrew
Published online: 26 April 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.131.11avi
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.131.11avi
Many studies on perception verbs have dealt with the typology and semantic properties of their clausal complements. Other studies have dealt with the lexical relatedness of different perception verbs with a common sensory modality. Bridging these two views, this work focuses on the Modern Hebrew verb le-hariax ‘to smell’, which alternates in the case-marking of the experiencer and in the type of complement clause, and on the semantic properties which accompany the alternation. The lexical relatedness between words with a common sensory base is expressed through morpho-syntactic means, shared with verbs of other sensory modalities, and these shed light on the linguistic manifestation of the sensory hierarchy and on the contribution of voice alternation within the field of perception.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The perception of smell
- 2.1Modern Hebrew perception verbs: An overview
- 2.2The morpho-syntactic alternation of Modern Hebrew perception verbs
- 2.3Factivity
- 2.4Belief formation
- 2.5Indirect perception
- 2.6Non-literal uses
- 2.7An account for the alternating perception le-hariax in Modern Hebrew
- 3.Smell and taste verbs in Modern Hebrew
- 3.1 le raxreax ‘to sniff out’ and le hasnip̄ ‘to sniff’
- 3.2Odor emission le-hariax
- 3.3 li-t’om ‘to taste’
- 4.From Biblical smell to Modern Hebrew smell
- 5.Conclusions
Acknowledgments Abbreviations Notes References
References (66)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Storch, Anne. 2013. Linguistic expression of perception and cognition: A typological glimpse. In Perception and Cognition in Language and Culture [Brill’s Studies in Language, Cognition and Culture 3], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds), 1–46. Leiden: Brill.
Avineri, Bar. 2017. Alternating Perception Verbs in Modern Hebrew. MA thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Barwise, Jon & Perry, John. 1981. Situations and attitudes. The Journal of Philosophy 78(11): 668–691.
Bat-El, Outi. 1994. Stem modification and cluster transfer in Modern Hebrew. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 571–593. .
Benedicto, Elena E. 1995. (Relativized) minimality, datives, and reflexive suffixes. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 2(2): Article 3. <[URL]> (19 February 2019).
Brook, Marisa. 2014. Comparative complementizers in Canadian English: Insights from early fiction. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20(2): Article 2. <[URL]> (16 October 2017).
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Corpus of Modern Yiddish (CMY). <[URL]> (21 July 2019).
Cusic, David Dowell. 1981. Verbal Plurality and Aspect. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Dalmatzky-Fischler, Brakha. 2000. Agnon, yalon ve-tur ha-lašon: šiquley ha-sop̄er, ha-balšan ve-ha-poseq be-sugiyat ha-normatiḇiyut (Agnon, Yalon and the language column: The arguments of the author, the linguist and the arbiter in normative issue). In Raphael Nir Jubilee Book: Studies in Communication, Linguistics and Language Teaching, Ora R. Schwarzwald, Shoshana Blum-Kulka & Elite Olshtain (eds), 144–165. Jerusalem: Carmel.
Dik, Simon C. & Hengeveld, Kees. 1991. The hierarchical structure of the clause and the typology of perception verb complements. Linguistics 29(2): 231–259.
Digonnet, Rémi. 2018. The linguistic expression of smells: From lack to abundance? In Sensory Perceptions in Language, Embodiment and Epistemology [Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics 42], Annalisa Baicchi, Rémi Digonnet & Jodi L. Sandford (eds), 177–191. Cham: Springer.
Doron, Edit. 2003. Agency and voice: The semantics of the Semitic templates. Natural Language Semantics 11(1): 1–67.
. 2008. Trumato šel ha-binyan le-mašma’ut ha-po’al (The contribution of the template to verb meaning). In Theoretical Hebrew Linguistics, Galia Hatav (ed.), 57–88. Jerusalem: Magnes Press. <[URL]> (3 December 2016).
. 2016. Introduction. In Language Contact and the Development of Modern Hebrew, Edit Doron (ed.), 1–22. Leiden: Brill.
Egré, Paul. 2008. Question-embedding and factivity. Grazer Philosophische Studien 77(1): 85–125. <[URL]> (20 August 2018).
Even-Shoshan, Abraham. 1977–1980. Qonqordancia xadaša le-tora, neḇi’im u-ktuḇim: ‘ocar lešon ha-miqra – ‘iḇrit va-’aramit; šorašim, milim, šemot pratiim, cerup̄im ve-nirdap̄im (A New Concordance of the Bible: Thesaurus of the Language of the Bible, Hebrew and Aramaic, Roots, Words, Proper Names, Phrases and Synonyms). Jerusalem: Kiryat Sefer.
Gadish, Ronit. 2007. Darḵey ha-haba’a šel šem ha-to’ar le-ciun ha-’ep̄šarut: ‘iyun be-ma’agar ha-munaxim šel ha-’aqademia u-ḇa-milonut ha-’iḇrit (The adjectival ways of expressing possibility: A study of the glossary of the Hebrew Academy and of Hebrew lexicography). In Sha’arei Lashon. Studies in Hebrew, Aramaic and Jewish Languages Presented to Moshe Bar-Asher, Vol. 3: Modern Hebrew and the Jewish Languages, Aharon Maman, Steven E. Fassberg & Yochanan Breuer (eds), 71–85. Jerusalem: Bialik Institute.
Greenberg, Yael. 2010. Event internal pluractionality in Modern Hebrew: A semantic analysis of one verbal reduplication pattern. Brill’s Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 2(1): 119–164.
Grossman, David. 2014. Sus ‘exad niḵnas le-bar (A Horse Walks into a Bar). Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad Publishing Group / Siman Kria Books.
Higginbotham, James. 1983. The logic of perceptual reports: An extensional alternative to situation semantics. The Journal of Philosophy 80(2): 100–127.
Historical Dictionary Project of the Hebrew Language ( Ma’agarim). <[URL]> (16 July 2019).
Historical Jewish Press. <[URL]> (12 April 2018).
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 1997. Smelling and perception: A cross-linguistic study. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa 612: 113–121.
. 1999. Metaphorical mapping in the sense of smell. In Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Raymond W. GibbsJr. & Gerard J. Steen (eds), 29–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jespersen, Otto. 1940[1961]. A Modern English Grammar. On Historical Principles, Part V: Syntax, Fourth Volume. London: Allen & Unwin, Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.
Kaddari, Menahem Zevi. 2006. Milon ha-’iḇrit ha-miqra’it: ‘osar lešon ha-Miqra’ me-Alef ‘ad Taw (A Dictionary of Biblical Hebrew). Ramat-Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press.
Karttunen, Lauri. 1970. On the semantics of complement sentences. In Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 6: 328–340.
Kastner, Itamar. 2015. Factivity mirrors interpretation: The selectional requirements of presuppositional verbs. Lingua 164(A): 156–188.
Kiparsky, Paul & Kiparsky, Carol. 1970. Fact. In Progress in Linguistics. A Collection of Papers, Manfred Bierwisch & Karl Erlich Heidolph (eds), 143–173. The Hague: Mouton.
Kirsner, Robert S. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1976. The role of pragmatic inference in semantics: A study of sensory verb complements in English. Glossa 10(2): 200–240.
Kratschmer, Alexandra Regina. 2013. The witness wins it all. The interplay of evidentiality, factivity and event type: The German conjunction wie ‘how’ following verbs of perception. Sprache und Sprachen 45: 32–54.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In The Generic Book, Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds), 125–175. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33], Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds), 109–137. Dordrecht: Springer.
. 2007. Situations in natural language. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. <[URL]> (11 October 2008).
Krawczyk, Elizabeth Allyn. 2012. Inferred Propositions and the Expression of the Evidence relation in natural language: Evidentiality in Central Alaskan Yupik Eskimo and English. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University. <[URL]> (9 October 2018).
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Heycock, Caroline. 1988. Bare infinitives and external arguments. The Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 18: 271–285.
Kuzar, Ron. 1991. Psuqiyot nominalizacia ba-’iḇrit ha-isra’elit (Nominalized clauses in Israeli Hebrew). Hebrew Linguistics 36: 71–89.
Kyrk, Barbara. 1979. How factive are see, hear and feel and their Polish counterparts? Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 9: 147–164.
Landau, Idan. 2011. Predication vs. aboutness in copy raising. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 779–813. .
Legate, Julie Anne. 2010. On how how is used instead of that
. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28(1): 121–134.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Marušič, Franc & Rok, Žaucer. 2006. On the intensional feel-like construction in Slovenian: A case of a phonologically null verb. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24(4): 1093–1159.
Matushansky, Ora. 2002. Tipping the scales: The syntax of scalarity in the complement of seem
. Syntax 5(3): 219–276.
Mayr, Clemens. 2019. Triviality and interrogative embedding: Context sensitivity, factivity and neg-raising. Natural Language Semantics 27(3): 227–278.
Mittwoch, Anita. 2005. Do states have Davidsonian arguments? Some empirical considerations. In Event Arguments: Foundations and Applications, Claudia Maienborn & Angelika Wöllstein-Leisten (eds), 69–87. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Moulton, Keir. 2009. Natural Selection and the Syntax of Clausal Complementation. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts. <[URL]> (2 May 2017).
Nye, Rachel. 2013. Rethinking the distribution of English finite clausal complements. Evidence from complementizer-how clauses. Linguistics in the Netherlands 30: 119–130.
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1934. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 5, Charles Hartshorne & Paul Weiss (eds). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Rosenthal, Ruvik. 2006. Milon ha-sleng ha-maqip̄ (Dictionary of Israeli Slang), (4th edn). Jerusalem: Keter Books.
San Roque, Lila, Kendrick, Kobin H., Norcliffe, Elisabeth & Majid, Asifa. 2018. Universal meaning extensions of perception verbs are grounded in interaction. Cognitive Linguistics 29(3): 371–406.
Savchenko, Ulyana. 2014. Second Language Acquisition of Russian Applicative Experiencers. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.
Saydon, Vered. 2009. Ra’a, šama ve-hirgiš: mi-tp̄isa xušit li-tp̄isa siḵlit. ‘iyun taxbiri-semanti be-’iḇrit bat zmanenu (From physical to mental perception: A semantic and syntactic study of Contemporary Hebrew). Lĕšonénu: A Journal for the Study of the Hebrew Language and Cognate Subjects 71(1–2): 369–399.
Spector, Benjamin & Égré, Paul. 2015. A uniform semantics for embedded interrogatives: An answer, not necessarily the answer. Synthese 192(6): 1729–1784.
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Methaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54]. Cambridge: CUP.
Van ValinJr., Robert D. 1993. A synopsis of role and reference grammar. In Advances in Role and Reference Grammar [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 82], Robert D. Van ValinJr. (ed.), 1–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. .
2004. Semantic macroroles in role and reference grammar. In Semantische Rollen, Rolf Kailuweit & Martin Hummel (eds), 62–82. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
. 2008. Swedish verbs of perception from a typological and contrastive perspective. In Languages and Cultures in Contrast and Comparison [
Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 175], María de los ÁngelesGómez González, J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Elsa M. González Álvarez (eds), 123–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
