In:Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions
Edited by Katarzyna Janic and Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
[Typological Studies in Language 130] 2021
► pp. 515–548
Chapter 16Antipassives in Nakh-Daghestanian languages
Exploring the margins of a construction
Published online: 23 March 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.130.16com
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.130.16com
Abstract
Several Nakh-Daghestanian languages present
constructions that are candidate antipassives, in that the
construction is intransitive and is (at least sometimes) related to
a corresponding transitive construction, with A of the transitive
construction appearing as S of the intransitive, and P of the
transitive either corresponding to an oblique in the intransitive or
being omitted. All Nakh-Daghestanian antipassives are lexically
restricted, and their function is typically to shift aspectual value
in the direction of durativity, atelicity, iterativity, etc.
However, only Dargwa restricts the construction to transitive verbs,
while other languages also allow it with intransitive verbs, in
which case there is no change in argument structure. We explore the
implications of this for the definition of “antipassive” from the
perspective of canonical typology.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Avar-Andic-Tsezic languages
- 2.1Godoberi
- 2.2Tsezic
- 2.2.1Tsezic: Syntactic properties
- 2.2.2Tsezic: Semantics and pragmatics
- 2.3Avar
- 2.3.1Avar: Syntactic properties
- 2.3.2Avar: Semantics
- 3.Dargwa languages
- 3.1Akusha and Sanzhi Dargwa: Syntactic properties
- 3.2Akusha and Sanzhi Dargwa: Semantics and pragmatics
- 3.3Antipassives in other Dargwa languages
- 4.Antipassives and other detransitivizing operations in Nakh-Daghestanian languages
- 5.The main tenets of the antipassive constructions in Nakh-Daghestanian
- 6.Conclusion
Notes Abbreviations References
References (35)
Alekseev, Mikhail E., Alixanov, S. Z., Ataev, B. M., Magomedov, M. A., Magomodov, I. I., Madieva, G. I., Saidova, P. A. & Samedov, Dzh.S. 2014. Sovremennyj avarskij jazyk. Makhachkala: Aleph.
Arkadiev, Peter & Letuchiy, Alexander. 2021. Indirect antipassive in Circassian. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Comrie, Bernard. 2000. Valency-changing derivations in
Tsez. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 360–374. Cambridge: CUP.
Comrie, Bernard & Khalilov, Madžid Š. 2007. Durativnye i iterativnye glagoly v cezskix
jazykax. In Nasledie kak sistema cennostej: Jazyk, kul’tura,
istorija, Gadzhi G. Gamzatov (ed.), 531–541. Makhachkala: Institut jazyka, literatury i iskusstva im. Gamzata Cadasy Dagestanskogo nauchnogo centra Rossijskoj akademii nauk.
Comrie, Bernard, Khalilov, Madzhid & Khalilova, Zaira. 2015. Valency and valency classes in
Bezhta. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 541–570. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cooreman, Anne. 1994. A functional typology of
antipassives. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara A. Fox & Paul Hopper (eds), 49–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Daniel, Michael. 2019. Mehweb verb morphology. In The Mehweb Language: Essays on Phonology, Morphology and
Syntax, Michael Daniel, Dmitry Ganenkov & Nina Dobrushina (eds), 73–115. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Forker, Diana. 2012. The bi-absolutive construction in
Nakh-Daghestanian. Folia Linguistica 46(1): 75–108.
. 2013b. Differential agent marking in
Hinuq. In Argument Structure in Flux: The Naples Capri
Papers [Studies in Language Companion Series 131], Elly van Gelderen, Jóhanna Barðdal & Michaela Cennamo (eds), 33–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gagliardi, Annie, Michael Goncalves, Maria Polinsky & Nina Radkevich. 2014. The biabsolutive construction in Lak and
Tsez. Lingua 150: 137–170.
Ganenkov, Dmitry, Maisak, Timur & Merdanova, Solmaz. 2007. Non-canonical agent marking in
Agul. In Differential Subject Marking, Helen de Hoop & Peter de Swart (eds), 173–198. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ganenkov, Dmitry. In preparation. A Grammar of Chirag Dargwa. Bamberg.
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and
discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299.
Janic, Katarzyna. 2013. L’antipassif dans les langues
accusatives. PhD dissertation, Lumière University Lyon 2.
Janic, Katarzyna & Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena. 2021. The multifaceted nature of antipassive
constructions. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related
Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume).
Kazenin, Konstantin. 1998. On patient demotion in Lak. In Typology of Verbal Categories, Leonid Kulikov & Heinz Vater (eds), 95–115. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Khalilov, Madžid Š. & Khalilova, Zaira. 2016. Avar. In Word-formation: An International Handbook of the
Languages of Europe, Vol. 5, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 3633–3647. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Kibrik, Andrej A. 1996. Transitivity in lexicon and
grammar. In Godoberi, Aleksandr E. Kibrik (ed.), 108–147. Munich: Lincom.
Mallaeva, Zulajkhat M. 2007. Glagol avarskogo jazyka: Struktura, semantika,
funkcii. Makhachkala: Institut jazyka, literatury i iskusstva im. G. Cadasy.
Nichols, Johanna, Peterson, David A. & Barnes, Jonathan. 2004. Transitivizing and detransitivizing
languages. Linguistic Typology 8(2): 149–211.
Polinsky, Maria. 2013. Antipassive constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (21 August
2018).
. 2017. Antipassive. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Travis (eds), 303–331. Oxford: OUP.
Sumbatova, Nina. 2011. Person hierarchies and the problem of person
marker origin in Dargwa: facts and diachronic
problems. In Tense, Aspect, Modality and Finiteness in East Caucasian
Languages, Gilles Authier & Timur Maisak (eds), 131–160. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
Sumbatova, Nina R. & Lander, Jury A. 2014. Darginskij govor selenija Tanty: Grammatičeskij očerk,
voprosy sintaksisa. Moscow: JaSK.
Tatevosov, Sergei. 2011. Detelicization and argument suppression: Evidence
from Godoberi. Linguistics 49(1): 135–174.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Janic, Katarzyna
2021. Variation in the verbal marking of antipassive constructions. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 249 ff.
Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2021. The multifaceted nature of the antipassive construction. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 1 ff.
Payne, Doris L.
2021. The profile and development of the Maa (Eastern Nilotic)
antipassive. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 447 ff.
Say, Sergey
2021. Antipassive and the lexical meaning of verbs. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 177 ff.
Vidal, Alejandra & Doris L. Payne
2021. Polyfunctional vanka- in Nivaĉle and the
antipassive category. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 349 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
