In:Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions
Edited by Katarzyna Janic and Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
[Typological Studies in Language 130] 2021
► pp. 447–480
Chapter 14The profile and development of the Maa (Eastern Nilotic)
antipassive
Published online: 23 March 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.130.14pay
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.130.14pay
Abstract
Maa (Eastern Nilotic) language varieties have
nominative/accusative syntactic patterns, but also an antipassive
construction marked by the verb suffix -ɪshɔ(r).
This suffix turns an otherwise transitive construction into an
intransitive one that can no longer express the P. Semantically the
-ɪshɔ(r) construction focuses on the action of
the verb or profiles long-term characteristics or ability of the
agent. It is not required in imperfective situations, but most
commonly does correlate with them. Interestingly,
-ɪshɔ(r) may occur on some intransitive roots
where it appears to highlight imperfectivity. The
-ɪshɔ(r) antipassive construction does not
appear to reconstruct to proto-Eastern Nilotic, though a verb root
cognate with Maa ɪshɔ(r) ‘give’ does go back to a
Proto-Maa-Lotuko-Lopit genetic node (though non-Maa languages within
this group may lack the antipassive function). Given similarities
between ɪshɔ(r) ‘give’ and the suffix
-ɪshɔ(r), the possibility of an antipassive
developing from ‘give’ is explored. Potential “drift” or borrowing
under Kalenjin (Southern Nilotic) influence is also noted.
Keywords: valence, aspect, nominative alignment, diachrony, contact
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Basic Maa morphosyntax
- 3.The Maa antipassive
- 3.1Syntax and propositional semantics of the -ɪshɔ(r) construction with (di)transitive roots
- 3.2Functional profile of the -ɪshɔ(r)
construction
- 3.2.1Properties of the P
- 3.2.2Focus on the action or static situation
- 3.2.3Imperfective aspect situations
- 3.2.4Long-term characteristics: ‘Ability to x’
- 3.2.5 agent orientation
- 4.-ɪshɔ(r) with intransitive roots
- 5.Origin of the Maa antipassive
- 5.1Parallels with the Maa verb root ɪshɔ(r) ‘give’
- 5.2Possible cognacy with other Nilotic antipassive(-like)
morphology
- 5.2.1Potential cognates in Eastern Nilotic languages
- 5.2.2Borrowing or drift influenced by Southern Nilotic?
- 6.Conclusions
Notes Abbreviations References
References (62)
Allam, Massimino & Hughell, Martha. n.d. Otuho dictionary database. Unpublished.
Baković, Eric. 2001. Vowel harmony and cyclicity in Eastern
Nilotic. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley
Linguistics Society, General Session and Parasession on
Language and Gesture, Charles Chang, Michael J. Hauser, YuniKim, David Mortensen, Mischa Park-Doob & Maziat Toosarnvandani (eds), 1–12. Berkeley CA: BLS.
Barasa, David. 2016. Ateso Grammar: A Descriptive Account of an
Eastern Nilotic Language. PhD dissertation, University of Cape Town.
Brecht, Richard & Levine, James. 1985. Conditions on voice marking in
Russian. In Issues in Russian Morphosyntax, Michael Flier & Richard Brecht (eds), 118–137. Columbus OH: Slavica.
Comrie, Bernard, Forker, Diana, Khalilova, Zaira & van den Berg, Helma. 2021. Antipassives in Nakh-Daghestanian Languages:
Exploring the margins of a construction. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related
Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume).
Cooreman, Ann. 1994. A functional typology of
antipassives. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara A. Fox & Paul Hopper (eds), 49–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Creissels, Denis. 2012. The origin of antipassive markers in West Mande
languages. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica
Europaea, Stockholm, August 29-September 1. <[URL]> (10 August
2020).
Dimmendaal, Gerrit. 1983a. The two morphological verb classes in
Nilotic. In Nilotic Studies: Proceedings of the International
Symposium on Languages and History of the Nilotic
Peoples, Rainer Vossen & Marianne Bechhous-Gerst (eds), 269–309. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.
. 1987. Drift and selective mechanisms in morphological
changes: The Eastern Nilotic case. In Papers from the 7th International Conference on
Historical Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 48], Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba & Giuliano Bernini (eds), 193–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1988. The lexical reconstruction of Proto-Nilotic: A
first reconnaissance. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere 16: 5–67.
. 2006. Head marking, dependent marking, and constituent
order in the Nilotic area. In Studies in African Linguistic Typology [Typological Studies in Language 64], F. K. Erhard Voeltz (ed.), 71–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2009. Datives in Nilotic in a typological
perspective. Afrikanistik-Aegyptologie-Online. <[URL]> (10 August
2020).
. 2011. Historical Linguistics and the Comparative Study of
African Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fortescue, Michael. 1996. West Greenlandic half-transitive affixes in a
diachronic perspective. In Cultural and Social Research in Greenland 95/96: Essays
in Honour of Robert Petersen, Brigitte Jacobsen & Claus Andreasen (eds), 34–44. Nuuk: Lisimatusarfik, Atuakkiorfik.
Fortescue, Michael, Jacobson, Stephen & Kaplan, Lawrence. 2010. Comparative Eskimo Dictionary, with Aleut
Cognates. Fairbanks AK: Alaska Native Language Center.
Givón, Talmy (ed.). 1983. Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative
Cross-language Study [Typological Studies in Language 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hamaya, Mitsuyo. 1993. Maasai Auxiliaries and Infinitival
Constructions. MA Thesis, University of Oregon.
Heath, Jeffrey. 1976. Antipassivization: A functional
typology. In Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley
Linguistic Society, Henry Thompson, Kenneth Whistler, Vicki Edge, Jeri J. Jaeger, Ronya Javkin, Miriam Petruck, Christopher Smeall & Robert D. Van ValinJr. (eds), 202–211. Berkeley CA: BLS.
Israeli, Alina. 1997. Semantics and Pragmatics of the “Reflexive” Verbs in
Russian. Munich: Otto Sagner.
Jacques, Guillaume. 2014. Denominal affixes as sources of antipassive
markers in Japhug Rgyalrong. Lingua 138: 1–22.
Janic, Katarzyna. 2013. L’antipassif dans les langues
accusatives. PhD dissertation, Lumière University Lyon 2.
. 2016. On the reflexive-antipassive polysemy:
Typological convergence from unrelated
languages. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Meetings of the
Berkeley Linguistics Society, Nicholas Rolle, Jeremy Steffman & John Sylak-Glassman (eds), 158–173. Berkeley CA: BLS.
Janic, Katarzyna & Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena. 2021. The multifaceted nature of the antipassive
construction. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related
Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume).
Jerono, Prisca. 2016. Passive and antipassive in Tugen. Paper presented at the Syntax of the World’s Languages 7
conference, Mexico City.
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
König, Christa. 2006. Marked nominative in Africa. Studies in Language 30(4): 655–732.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary
Investigation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Malchukov, Andrej. 2017. Markedness effects in applicative
formation. In Verb Valency Changes: Theoretical and Typological
Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 120], Albert Álvarez Gonzáles & Ía Navarro (eds), 3–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mithun, Marianne. 2000. Valency-changing derivation in Central Alaskan
Yup’ik. In Changing Valency, Case Studies in Transitivity, R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 84–114. Cambridge: CUP.
Muratori, Carlo. 1948. English Bari-Lotuxo-Acoli Vocabulary. Okaru: Catholic Mission Printing Press.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir. 2007. Polysemy of reciprocal markers. In Reciprocal Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 71], Vladimir Nedjalkov (ed.), 231–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Payne, Doris L. 1997. Argument structure and locus of affect in the
Maasai External Possession construction. In Proceedings of the 23rd Meeting of the Berkeley
Linguistics Society, Special Volume on Syntax in African
Languages (23S), Ashlee C. Bailey, Kevin E. Moore & Jeri L. Moxley (eds), 98–115. Berkeley CA: BLS.
2001. The explanation of argument structure:
Lexicalization or discourse use? Proceedings of the Seoul International Conference on
Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics, 532–556. Seoul: Korean Society of Discourse and Cognition.
2011. The Maa (Eastern Nilotic) Impersonal
Construction. In Impersonal Constructions. A Cross-Linguistic
Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 124], Anna Siewierska & Andrej Malchukov (eds), 257–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Payne, Doris L., Hamaya, Mitsuyo & Jacobs, Peter. 1994. Active, passive, and inverse in
Maasai. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], Talmy Givón (ed.), 283–315. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Polinsky, Maria. 2013. Antipassive constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (10 August
2020).
. 2017. Antipassive. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Travis (eds), 308–331. Oxford: OUP.
Rottland, Franz. 1982. Die südnilotischen Sprachen: Beschreibung, Vergleichung
und Rekonstruktion [Kölner Beitrage zur Afrikanistik 7]. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.
Sansò, Andrea. 2017. Where do antipassive constructions come from? A
study in diachronic typology. Diachronica 34(2): 175–218.
Schroeder, Martin. 1999. Dictionary Toposa-English, English-Toposa, 1st edn. Nairobi: SIL International.
Silverstein, Michael. 1972a. Chinook Jargon: Language contact and the problem
of multi-level generative systems, I. Language 48(2): 378–406.
. 1972b. Chinook Jargon: Language contact and the problem
of multi-level generative systems, II. Language 48(3): 596–625.
Tatevosov, Sergei. 2011. Detelicization and argument suppression: Evidence
from Godoberi. Linguistics 49(1): 135–174.
Thompson, Chad. 1989. Voice and Obviation in Athabaskan and Other
Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.
Tucker, Archibald N. & Mpaayei, John T. 1955. Maasai Grammar, with Vocabulary. London: Longman, Greens.
Vossen, Rainer. 1982. The Eastern Nilotes: Linguistic and Historical
Reconstructions. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.
Yap, Foong Ha & Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2003. From causatives to passives: A passage in East
and Southeast Asian languages. In Cognitive Linguistics and Non-Indo-European
Languages, Eugene Casad & Gary Palmer (eds), 419–445. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2007. The emergence of GIVE passives in East and
Southeast Asian languages. In SEALS VIII: Papers from the 8th meeting of the Southeast
Asian Linguistics Society (1998), Mark Alves, Paul Sidwell & David Gil (eds), 193–208. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Janic, Katarzyna
2021. Variation in the verbal marking of antipassive constructions. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 249 ff.
Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2021. The multifaceted nature of the antipassive construction. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
