In:Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions
Edited by Katarzyna Janic and Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
[Typological Studies in Language 130] 2021
► pp. 177–212
Chapter 6Antipassive and the lexical meaning of verbs
Published online: 23 March 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.130.06say
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.130.06say
Abstract
Descriptions of antipassive constructions in
individual languages show that these constructions are often
compatible with only a subset of transitive verbs. There are
significant typological similarities between the sets of verbs that
allow antipassivization. The following properties are typical of
these verbs: (1) agentive A, (2) specification of the manner
component in the verb meaning, (3) lack of inherent telicity (the
transitive use can be compositionally transitive, but this is
cancelled under antipassivization), (4) narrow class of potential
Ps, and (5) affectedness of A. Verbs with all of the properties in
(1)–(5), such as ‘eat’, constitute the core of “natural
antipassives”, whereas verbs with only some of these properties are
at the periphery of this class. Apart from being especially prone to
enter antipassive constructions, the fuzzy class of natural
antipassives is relevant for a number of phenomena. First,
polyfunctional valency-related markers or constructions tend to
yield antipassive reading when applied to natural antipassives.
Second, natural antipassives tend to choose the less marked
construction in languages with two antipassive constructions. Third,
lexicalization of antipassives is more likely for verbs that lack
natural antipassive properties, and a typical scenario of
lexicalization involves coercion of some of these properties.
Ultimately, I conjecture that it is the relevance of the P-argument
for the meaning of the verb which accounts for the rarity of
lexically unrestricted and semantically uniform antipassive
constructions in the world’s languages.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The limits of natural antipassives
- 2.1Lexical lists
- 2.2Properties
- 2.3Inanimacy of the P-argument
- 3.Natural antipassives and the lexical extent of antipassives
- 4.Natural antipassives and syncretic antipassive markers
- 5.Languages with multiple antipassive constructions
- 6.Lexicalization of antipassives
- 6.1Lexical effects of antipassivization
- 6.2Coerced agentivity
- 6.3Semantic incorporation of the P-argument
- 7.Discussion
Acknowledgements Notes Abbreviations References
References (71)
Arkadiev, Peter & Letuchiy, Alexander. 2008. Derivacii antipassivnoj zony v adygejskom
jazyke. In Issledovanija po glagol’noj derivacii, Vladmir Plungian & Sergey Tatevosov (eds), 77–102. Moscow: JaSK.
Austin, Peter K. 2013. A Grammar of Diyari, South Australia (2nd edn). London: SOAS, University of London.
Basilico, David. 2012. The antipassive and its relation to scalar
structure. In The End of Argument Structure? [Syntax and Semantics 38], María Cristina Cuervo & Yves Roberge (eds), 75–103. Bingley: Emerald Press.
Bugaeva, Anna. 2013. Ainu valency patterns. In Valency Patterns Leipzig, Iren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (24 June 2017).
. 2015. Valency classes in Ainu. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 807–854. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
. 2021. Unspecified participant: A case of antipassive in
Ainu. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related
Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume).
Comrie, Bernard, Forker, Diana, Khalilova, Zaira & van der Berg, Helma. 2021. Antipassives in Nakh-Daghestanian languages:
Exploring the margins of a construction. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related
Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume).
Cooreman, Ann. 1994. A functional typology of
antipassives. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara A. Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds). 49–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2012. The origin of antipassive markers in West Mande
languages. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica
Europaea, Stockholm, 29 August–1 September.
. 2015. Valency properties of Mandinka
verbs. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 221–259. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
. 2021. Antipassive derivation in Soninke (West
Mande). In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related
Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume).
de Swart, Peter, Lamers, Monique & Lestrade, Sander. 2008. Animacy, argument structure, and argument
encoding. Lingua 118: 131–140.
Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Introduction. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 3–29. Cambridge: CUP.
Estigarribia, Bruno. 2017. A grammar sketch of Paraguayan
Guaraní. In Guarani Linguistics in the 21st Century, Bruno Estigarribia & Justin Pinta (eds), 7–85. Leiden: Brill.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1986. Pragmatically controlled zero
anaphora. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the
Berkeley Linguistics Society, Vassiliki Nikiforidou, Mary VanClay, Mary Niepokuj & Deborah Feder (eds), 95–107. Berkeley CA: BLS.
Fleck, David W. 2006. Antipassive in Matses. Studies in Language 30(3): 541–573.
Givón, Talmy & Bommelyn, Loren. 2000. The evolution of de-transitive voice in Tolowa
Athabaskan. Studies in Language 24(1): 41–76.
Hartmann, Iren. 2013. Hoocąk valency patterns. In Valency Patterns Leipzig, Iren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds). <[URL]> (24 June 2017).
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb
alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2015. Transitivity prominence. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 131–147. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Heath, Jeffrey. 1976. Antipassivization: A functional
typology. In Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley
Linguistic Society, Henry Thompson, Kenneth Whistler, Vicki Edge, Jeri J. Jaeger, Ronya Javkin, Miriam Petruck, Christopher Smeall & Robert D. Van ValinJr. (eds), 202–211. Berkeley CA: BLS.
Heaton, Raina. 2017. A Typology of Antipassives, with Special
Reference to Mayan. PhD dissertation, University of Hawaii.
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and
discourse. Language 56(2): 251–350.
Jacques, Guillaume. 2021. Antipassive derivations in
Sino-Tibetan/Trans-Himalayan and their
sources. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related
Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume).
Janic, Katarzyna. 2013. L’antipassif dans les langues
accusatives. PhD dissertation. Lumière University Lyon 2.
Janic, Katarzyna & Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena. 2021. The multifaceted nature of the antipassive construction. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related
Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume).
Kazenin, Konstantin I. 1994. On the lexical distribution of agent-preserving
and object-preserving transitivity
alternation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 17(2): 141–154.
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kibrik, Aleksander E. & Testelec, Jakov G. 2004. Bezhta. In The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, Vol. 3: The
North East Caucasian Languages, Part 1, Michael Job (ed.), 217–298. Ann Arbor MI: Caravan.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternation. A Preliminary
Investigation. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
. 2015. Verb classes within and across
languages. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1627–1670. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Lichtenberk, František. 1999. Reciprocals without reflexives. In Reflexives: Forms and Functions [Typological Studies in Language 40], Zygmunt Frajzingier & Tracy S. Curl (eds), 31–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Malchukov, Andrej. 2005. Case pattern splits, verb types, and construction
competition. In Competition and Variation in Natural Languages, Mengistu Amberber & Helen de Hoop (eds), 73–117. London: Elsevier.
. 2015. Valency classes and alternations: parameters of
variation. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 73–130. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
. 2016. “Ambivalent voice”: Markedness effects in valency
change. In Transitivity and Valency Alternations: Studies on
Japanese and Beyond, Taro Kageyama & Wesley M. Jacobsen (eds), 389–422. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Masica, Colin P. 1976. Defining a Linguistic Area: South Asia. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Mithun, Marianne. 2021. Antipassive propensities and
alignment. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related
Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume)..
Mondloch, James Lorin. 1981. Voice in Quiche-Maya. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Albany.
Næss, Åshild. 2007. Prototypical Transitivity [Typological Studies in Language 72]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2009. How transitive are eat and
drink verbs? In The Linguistics of Eating and Drinking [Typological Studies in Language 84], John Newman (ed.), 27–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nouguier-Voisin, Sylvie. 2002. Relations entre fonctions syntaxiques et
fonctions sémantiques en wolof. PhD dissertation, Lumière University Lyon 2.
Polinsky, Maria. 2013. Antipassive constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (21 June 2017).
. 2017. Antipassive. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa DeMena Travis (eds), 308–331. Oxford: OUP.
Pustet, Regina & Rood, David S. 2008. Argument dereferentialization in
Lakota. In The Typology of Semantic Alignment, Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds), 334–356. Oxford: OUP.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth. 1998. Building verb meanings. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional
Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 97–134. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Sansò, Andrea. 2017. Where do antipassive constructions come from? A
study in diachronic typology. Diachronica 34(2): 175–218.
Say, Sergey. 2005. Antipassive sja-verbs in
Russian: Between inflection and derivation. In Morphology and its Demarcations [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 264], Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Franz Rainer (eds), 253–275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2008. K tipologii antipassivnyx konstrukcij: Semantika,
pragmatika, sintaksis. PhD dissertation, St. Petersburg, Institute for Linguistic Studies, RAS.
Tatevosov, Sergei. 2011. Detelicization and argument suppression: Evidence
from Godoberi. Linguistics 49(1): 135–174.
Terrill, Angela. 1997. The development of antipassive constructions in
Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 17(1): 71–88.
Vakhtin, Nikolai B. 1981. Refleksiv v eskimosskom jazyke. In Zalogovye konstrukcii v raznostrukturnyx
jazykax, Viktor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), 266–272. Leningrad: Nauka.
Wichmann, Søren. 2015. Statistical observations on implicational (verb)
hierarchies. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 155–181. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Bondarenko, Alice
van Lier, Eva & Maria Messerschmidt
Arkadiev, Peter & Alexander Letuchiy
2021. Indirect antipassive in Circassian. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 483 ff.
Bugaeva, Anna
Janic, Katarzyna
2021. Variation in the verbal marking of antipassive constructions. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 249 ff.
Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2021. The multifaceted nature of the antipassive construction. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 1 ff.
Seržant, Ilja A., Katarzyna Maria Janic, Darja Dermaku & Oneg Ben Dror
2021. Typology of coding patterns and frequency effects of antipassives. Studies in Language 45:4 ► pp. 968 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
