In:The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages: An emergent unit in interaction
Edited by Tsuyoshi Ono and Sandra A. Thompson
[Typological Studies in Language 128] 2020
► pp. 329–362
Chapter 13Robust argument phrases (DPs) but unruly NPs in Maa
Published online: 15 July 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.128.13pay
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.128.13pay
Abstract
Maa (sometimes referred to as Maasai) discourse and syntax largely require determined phrases. NP is not a robust construction in Maa, partly because ‘noun’ is not highly distinguished morphosyntactically from ‘adjective.’ Either can be a syntactic argument just if preceded by a determiner; ‘ablity to serve as an argument’ does not correspond to a lexical N or NP category. The paper proposes a definition of ‘determiner’, which includes Maa demonstratives and gender+number proclitics. The latter do not signal identifiability, givenness, or referentiality. Gender is not lexical feature of most noun/adjective stems, but is specified by whatever determiner is used. The determiners appear to help hearers cognitively establish a referent based on attributed gender (sometimes at the moment of speech), and make a phrase able to serve as an argument.
Article outline
- 1.The problem and background
- 2.Data and methodology
- 3.Definitional challenges
- 3.1Common criteria for ‘noun’ and ‘noun phrase’
- 3.2Criteria for ‘determiner’
- 4.The Maa determiner function
- 5.Properties of Maa word bases that refer and modify
- 5.1Properties that group time-stable and Type I property-concept terms
- 5.2Order within the nominal phrase template
- 5.2.1Immediately after a determiner
- 5.2.2Lexemes in Position 1 or Position 2
- 5.2.3Order after the noun within the nominal phrase template
- 5.3Complement of a ‘be’ verb
- 5.4Perfect(ive) aspect morphology, inchoative aspect morphology, and morphological causative morphology
- 5.5Modification by olêŋ ‘very’
- 6.Maa DPs as arguments and referring phrases in discourse
- 6.1Maa DPs as arguments and in syntax
- 6.2Maa proclitic determiners in discourse
- 6.3Contexts in which determiners are omitted
- 7.Conclusions
Acknowledgements Notes Abbreviations References
References (36)
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, Function, and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dimmendaal, Gerrit. 2000. Number marking and noun categorization in Nilo-Saharan languages. Anthropological Linguistics 42: 214–261.
Dixon, Robert M. W. 2010. Basic Linguistic Theory. Methodology Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dryer, Matthew. 2007. Noun phrase structure. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II: Complex Constructions (2ndd edn), Timothy Shopen (ed.), 151–205. Cambridge: CUP.
Du Bois, John. 1980. Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse. In The Pear Stories, Wallace Chafe (ed.), 203–274. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
Fabre, Alain. 2016. Gramática de la lengua nivacle (familia mataguaya, chaco paraguayo). Munich: Lincom.
Givón, Talmy. 1990. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ghomeshi, Jila, Paul, Ileana & Wiltschko, Martina (eds). 2009. Determiners: Universals and Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 147]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Greenberg, Joseph. 1981. Nilo-Saharan moveable-k as a Stage III article (with a Penutian typological parallel). Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 3: 105–112.
Hale, Kenneth. 1982. Preliminary remarks on configurationality. Proceedings of the Northeastern Linguistics Society 12: 86–96.
Hopper, Paul & Thompson, Sandra A. 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 60: 703–752.
Paul, Ileana. 2009. On the presence versus absence of determiners in Malagasy. French Studies Publications 65. The University of Western Ontario. <[URL]>
Payne, Doris L. 1990. The Pragmatics of Word Order: Typological Dimensions of Verb Initial Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
1993. Nonconfigurationality and discontinuous expressions in Panare. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Special Session on Syntactic Issues in Native American Languages, David A. Peterson (ed.), 121–138. Berkeley CA: University of California.
1997a. The Maasai external possession construction. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type, Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra Thompson (eds), 395–422. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1997b. Argument structure and locus of affect in the Maasai External Possession construction. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Special Volume on Syntax in African Languages (S23), 98–115. Berkeley CA: BLS.
Payne, Doris L. & Olsen, Derek. 2009. Maa (Maasai) nominalization: Animacy, agentivity, and instrument. In Selected Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, Masangu Mtondo, Fiona McLaughlin & Eric Potsdam (eds), 151–165. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Payne, John & Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Nouns and noun phrases. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 323–523. Cambridge: CUP.
Schachter, Paul & Shopen, Timothy. 2007. Parts-of-speech systems. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol 1: Clause Structure, 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 1–60. Cambridge: CUP.
Shirtz, Shahar & Payne, Doris L. 2013. The problem of ‘Head’ in Maa (Maasai) nominal phrases. In Selected Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference on African Linguistics, Olanike Ola Orie & Karen W. Sanders (eds), 207–221. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. <[URL]>
Stell, Nelida Noemi. 1989. Gramatica descriptiva de la lengua niwakle (chulupi). PhD dissertation, Universidad de Buenos Aires.
