In:The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages: An emergent unit in interaction
Edited by Tsuyoshi Ono and Sandra A. Thompson
[Typological Studies in Language 128] 2020
► pp. 153–178
Chapter 7Multimodal noun phrases
Published online: 15 July 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.128.07kee
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.128.07kee
Abstract
In co-present interaction, our bodies are continuously available for sense-making. Linguists, however, have generally analyzed grammatical patterns, such as noun phrases, separately from the rest of human behavior. This chapter looks at a collection of cases in Swedish, English, and Estonian, where the speaker initiates a noun phrase but completes it with an embodied demonstration. Other participants treat this multimodal structure as complete and comprehensible. Building on earlier research on syntactic-bodily units (Keevallik 2013, 2017) this study calls into question the analytic boundary between language and the body and argues that grammatical projection cross-cuts modalities even within the assumedly robust noun phrase.
Article outline
- Introduction
- The data and the collection
- Simple NP-initiations: An article, a demonstrative, an adjective
- Article
- Demonstrative
- Adjective
- Complex NP-initiations
- Article + adjective(s)
- Demonstrative + adjective
- Participant orientation to a multimodal noun phrase: Collaborative completion
- Verbal completion of a multimodal noun phrase
- Repair or re-completion?
- Conclusion
Acknowledgements Note Transcription conventions References
References (34)
The paper uses multimodal transcription conventions developed by Lorenza Mondada: <[URL]>
. 2009. On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31(1):1–13.
Broth, Mathias & Keevallik, Leelo. 2014. Getting ready to move as a couple: Accomplishing mobile formations in a dance class. Space and Culture 17(2): 107–121.
Enfield, Nick. 2009. The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances. Cambridge: CUP.
Goodwin, Charles. 2000. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522.
. 2006. Human sociality as mutual orientation in a rich interactive environment: Multimodal utterances and pointing in aphasia. In Roots of Human Sociality, Nicholas J. Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson (eds), 96–125. London: Berg Press.
Haviland, John B. 2007. Master speakers, master gesturers: A string quartet master class. In Gesture and the Dynamic Dimension of Language: Essays in Honor of David McNeill [Gesture Studies 1], Susan D. Duncan, Justine Cassell & Elena T. Levy (eds), 147–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hayashi, Makoto. 2005. Joint turn construction through language and the body: Notes on embodiment in coordinated participation in situated activities. Semiotica 156: 21–53.
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2001. Emerging syntax for interaction: Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interaction. In Studies in Interactional Linguistics [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 10], Margret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 25–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul. 1998. Emergent grammar. In New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 155–175. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jones, Stanley E. & LeBaron, Curtis D. 2002. Research on the relationship between verbal and nonverbal communication: Emerging integrations. Journal of Communication 52: 499–521.
Keevallik, Leelo. 2010. The interactional profile of a placeholder: The Estonian demonstrative see. In Fillers, Pauses and Placeholders [Typological Studies in Language 93], Nino Amiridze, Boyd H. Davis & Margaret Maclagan (eds), 139–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2013. The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax. Research on Language and Social Interaction 46(1): 1–21.
. 2015. Coordinating the temporalities of talk and dance. In: Temporality in Interaction, A. Deppermann & S. Günthner (eds.), 309–336. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2017. Linking performances: The temporality of contrastive grammar. In Linking Clauses and Actions in Social Interaction, Ritva Laury, Marja Etelämäki & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 54–72. Helsinki: Finnish Literary Society.
. 2018. What does embodied interaction tell us about grammar? Research on Language and Social Interaction 51(1): 1–23.
Lerner, Gene H. 1995. Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes 19: 111–131.
Li, Xiaoting. 2013. Language and the body in the construction of units in Mandarin face-to-face interaction. In Units of Talk – Units of Action [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 25], Beatrice Szczepek Reed & Geoffrey Raymond (eds), 343–375. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mondada, Lorenza. 2014. The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 65: 137–156.
. 2016. Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(3): 336–366.
Mori, Junko & Hayashi, Makoto. 2006. The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics 27: 195–219.
Olsher, David. 2004. Talk and gesture: The embodied completion of sequential actions in spoken interaction. In Second Language Conversations, Rod Gardner & Johannes Wagner (eds), 221–245. London: Continuum.
Pajusalu, Renate. 1997. Is there an article in (spoken) Estonian? In Estonian Typological Studies II [Tartu Ülikooli eesti keele õppetooli toimetised 8], Mati Erelt (ed.), 146–177. Tartu: Tartu ülikooli kirjastus.
. 2005. Anaphoric pronouns in spoken Estonian. Crossing the paradigms. In Minimal Reference. The Use of Pronouns in Finnish and Estonian Discourse [Studia Fennica Linguistica 12], Ritva Laury (ed.), 107–134. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 696–735.
Slama-Cazacu, Tatiana. 1976. Nonverbal components in message sequence: Mixed syntax. In Language and Man: Anthropological Issues, William Charles McCormack & Stephen Wurm (eds), 217–227. The Hague: Mouton.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Ehmer, Oliver
2025. Marking action accomplishment with non‑lexical vocalizations. Interactional Linguistics 5:1-2 ► pp. 22 ff.
Ryou, Juyoung, Chris Cushion, Daniel Rhind & Ed Cope
Neyra, Rosario, Matthew Butler, Emilie Munch Nicolaisen, Paul Sbertoli-Nielsen, Catherine L. Tam, Barbara A. Fox & Chase Wesley Raymond
Suzuki, Ryoko
2024. Manipulating referentiality and creating phaticness. In (Non)referentiality in Conversation [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 344], ► pp. 141 ff.
Oloff, Florence
Hsu, Hui-Chieh, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts
Hsu, Hui-Chieh, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts
Tao, Hongyin
2020. NP clustering in Mandarin conversational interaction. In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128], ► pp. 271 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
