References (64)
References
Alarcos Llorach, Emilio. 1999. Gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolaños-Carpio, Alexa. 2017. Interactions in Calls to the 9-1-1 Emergency System in Costa Rica. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina B. & Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2011. Soliciting accounts with ‘why’-interrogatives in naturally occurring English conversation. Journal of Communication 61: 94–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio. 1980. Sobre la negación. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Esther L. & Rivas, Javier. 2012. Grammatical relation probability: How usage patterns shape analogy. Language Variation and Change 24: 317–341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busquets, Joan, Koike, Dale & Vann, Robert. 2001. Spanish ‘no, sí’: Reactive moves to perceived face-threatening acts: Part I. Journal of Pragmatics 33(5): 701–725. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cashman, Holly R. & Raymond, Chase Wesley. 2014. Doing gender in soccer (football) and beyond: Making gender relevant in Spanish-language broadcast discourse. Gender & Language 8(3): 311–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. & Heritage, John. 2014. Benefactors and beneficiaries: Benefactive status and stance in the management of offers and requests. In Requesting in Social Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 26], Paul Drew & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), 55–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. & Raymond, Chase Wesley. 2015. Modular pivots: A resource for extending turns at talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48(4): 388–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. In prep. ‘You know’ as a ‘with-me’ token: The case of speech production and understanding difficulties.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, Thompson, Sandra A. & Fox, Barbara A. Forthcoming. Do English affirmative polar questions with ‘any’ prefer negative responses? Presented at ICCA-18, July 11–15, Loughborough University.
Curl, Traci S. & Drew, Paul. 2008. Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(2): 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, Judy. 1984. Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In Structures of Social Action, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 102–28. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1980. Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse. In The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, Wallace L. Chafe (ed.), 203–274. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández Soriano, Olga & Táboas Baylín, Susana. 1999. Construcciones impersonales no reflejas. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 1723–1778. Madrid: Real Academia Española/Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. 1987. Discourse Structure and Anaphora: Written and Conversational English. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Principles shaping grammatical practices: An exploration. Discourse Studies 9(3): 299–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García-Ramón, Amparo. 2018. Indexing epistemic incongruence: ‘uy’ as a formal sign of disagreement in agreement sequences in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 131: 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1979. The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, George Psathas (ed.), 97–121. New York NY: Irvington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González Temer, Verónica. 2017. A Multimodal Analysis of Assessment Sequences in Chilean Spanish Interaction. PhD dissertation, University of York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa & Bolden, Galina B. 2017. Transcribing for Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2012. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John & Raymond, Geoffrey. 2005. The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1): 15–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John & Robinson, Jeffrey. 2011. ‘Some’ versus ‘any’ medical issues: Encouraging patients to reveal their unmet concerns. In Applied Conversation Analysis: Changing Institutional Practices, Charles Antaki (ed.), 15–31. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Thompson, Sandra A. 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in Universal Grammar. Language 60(4): 703–752. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hummel, Martin, Kluge, Betina & Vázquez Laslop, María Eugenia. 2010. Fórmulas y formas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico. Mexico City DF: El Colegio de México/Karl Franzes, Universität Graz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1978a. Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In Studies in the Organization of Coversational Interaction, Jim Schenkein (ed.), 219–248. New York NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1978b. What’s in a ‘Nyem’? Sociology 12(1): 135–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 125], Gene H. Lerner (ed.), 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2011. The terms of not knowing. In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds), 184–206. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H. & Drew, Paul. 2016. Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49(1): 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William & Fanshel, David. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landone, Elena. 2009. Los marcadores del discurso y cortesía verbal en español. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larrivée, Pierre. 2016. The pragmatics of marked configurations: Negative doubling in French. Journal of Pragmatics 95: 34–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 2007. The TalkBank Project. In Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora: Synchronic Databases, Vol.1, Joan C. Beal, Karen P. Corrigan & Hermann L. Moisl (eds). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazeland, Harrie & Huiskes, Mike. 2001. Dutch ‘but’ as a sequential conjunction: Its use as a resumption marker. In Studies in Interactional Linguistics [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 10], Margaret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 141–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A. & Francis, Hartwell S. 2007. Lexical subjects and the conflation strategy. In The Grammar-Pragmatics Interface: Essays in Honor of Jeanette K. Gundel [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 155], Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski (eds), 19–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Thompson, Sandra. 2004. Japanese (w)atashi/ore/boku ‘I’: They’re not just pronouns. Cognitive Linguistics 14: 321–347.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita M. 1984. Pursuing a response. In Structures of Social Action, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 152–164. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raclaw, Joshua. 2013. Indexing Inferrables and Organizational Shifts: No-prefaces in English Conversation. PhD dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley. 2014. On the Sequential Negotiation of Identity in Spanish-Language Discourse: Mobilizing Linguistic Resources in the Service of Social Action. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Questions and responses in Spanish monolingual and Spanish-English bilingual conversation. Language & Communication 42: 50–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Linguistic reference in the negotiation of identity and action: Revisiting the T/V distinction. Language 92(3): 636–670. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Indexing a contrast: The ‘do’-construction in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 118: 22–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018a. ‘Bueno’-, ‘Pues’-, and ‘Bueno-Pues’-prefacing in Spanish conversation. In Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles across Languages [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 31], John Heritage & Marja-Leena Sorjonen (eds), 59–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018b. On the relevance and accountability of dialect: Conversation analysis and contact linguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 22(2): 161–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley, Clift, Rebecca & Heritage, John. Forthcoming. Reference without anaphora: On agency through grammar.
Raymond, Chase Wesley & Olguin, Luis Manuel. Forthcoming. Análisis de la conversación: Fundamentos, metodología y alcances. London: Routledge.
Raymond, Chase Wesley & Stivers, Tanya. 2016. The omnirelevance of accountability: Off-record account solicitations. In Accountability in Social Interaction, Jeffrey D. Robinson (ed.), 321–53. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. Grammar and social organization: Yes/No interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 68: 939–967. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey & Heritage, John. 2006. The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society 35: 677–705. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1974. An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, Richard Bauman & Joel Sherzer (eds), 337–53. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. Notes on methodology. In Structures of Social Action, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 21–27. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1992. Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided for place for the defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 95(5): 1295–1345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In Studies in Anaphora [Typological Studies in Language 33], Barbara A. Fox (ed.), 437–485. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. 2007. ‘Look’-prefaced turns in first and second position: Launching, interceding and redirecting action. Discourse Studies 9: 387–408. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2004. “No no no” and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research 30(2): 260–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Stance, alignment and affiliation during story telling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 47(1): 31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Fox, Barbara A. & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2015. Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Sequential Markers in Mexican Spanish Talk: A Conversation-analytic Study. PhD dissertation, University of Essex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Sue & Kitzinger, Celia. 2006. Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly 69: 150–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2010. Emphatic multiple negative expressions in Dutch. The Linguistic Review 27: 37–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Raymond, Chase Wesley
2022. Suffixation and sequentiality. Interactional Linguistics 2:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Raymond, Chase Wesley, Rebecca Clift & John Heritage
2021. Reference without anaphora: on agency through grammar. Linguistics 59:3  pp. 715 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue