References (32)
Data source
Arkisyn. 2018. A morphosyntactically coded database of conversational Finnish. Database compiled at the University of Turku, with material from the Conversation Analysis Archive at the University of Helsinki and the Syntax Archive at the University of Turku. Department of Finnish and Finno-Ugric Languages, University of Turku.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
References
Barnes, Betsy K. 1985. The Pragmatics of Left Detachment in Spoken Standard French [Pragmatics & Beyond VI:3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margret. 2001. Introducing interactional linguistics. In Studies in Interactional Linguistics [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 10], Margret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63: 805–855. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Kumpf, Lorraine E. & Ashby, William J. (eds). 2003. Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 14]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erringer, Anu. 1996. The Functions of Demonstrative Adjectives semmoinen, tämmöinen and tuommoinen in Finnish Conversation. MA thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernandez-Vest, M. M. Jocelyne. 2016. Detachment linguistics and information grammar of oral languages. In Information Structuring of Spoken Language from a Cross-linguistic perspective [Trends in Linguistics 283], M. M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest & Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (eds), 7–32. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A. & Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In The Language of Turn and Sequence, Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 14–38. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol (ed.). 2015. How Languages Work. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli & Karlsson, Fred. 1979. Nykysuomen lauseoppia. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Vilkuna, Maria, Korhonen, Riita, Koivisto, Vesa, Heinonen, Tarja & Alho, Irja. 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 1997. Functions of case-marking vs. non-marking in conversational Finnish. In Reconnecting Language: Morphology and Syntax in Functional Perspectives [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 154], Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, Kristin Davidse & Dirk Noël (eds), 213–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Syntax in the Making. The Emergence of Syntactic Units in Finnish Conversation [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Argument splits in Finnish grammar and discourse. In Du Bois, Kumpf & Ashby (eds), 247–272.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Free NPs as units in Finnish. Special issue on Usage-based Approaches and Typological Approaches to Linguistic Units, Ritva Laury, Tsuyoshi Ono & Ryoko Suzuki (guest eds). Studies in Language 43(2): 301–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Thompson, Sandra A. 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 60: 703–752. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huumo, Tuomas. 2007. Kvantiteetti ja aika II: Nominaalinen aspekti ja suomen predikatiivin sijavaihtelu. Virittäjä 111(1): 3–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lagae, Véronique. 2007. Left-detachment and topic-marking in French. Folia Linguistica 41(3): 327–355.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laitinen, Lea. 2006. Zero person in Finnish: A grammatical resource for construing human reference. In Grammar from the Human Perspective: Case, Space, and Person in Finnish [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 203], Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Lyle Campbell (eds), 209–231. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva. 1997. Demonstratives in Interaction: The Emergence of a Definite Article in Finnish [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva & Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2016. Detached NPs with relative clauses in Finnish conversations. In Information Structuring of Spoken Language from a Cross-linguistic Perspective, M. M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. (eds), 149–165. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leino, Jaakko. 2015. The syntactic and semantic history of the Finnish genitive subject. In Subjects in Constructions [Constructional Approaches to Language 16], Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Tuomas Huumo (eds), 231–251. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Thompson, Sandra A. 1994. Unattached NPs in English conversation. BLS 12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita & Heritage, John. 2012. Preference. In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds), 210–228. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, Vol. 2, ed. by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Savijärvi, Ilkka. 1977. Itämerensuomalaisten kielten kieltoverbi, Osa 1: Suomi (The negative verb in the Baltic-Finnic languages. Part 1: Finnish). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. The hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages [Linguistic Series No. 22], Robert M. W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. 2001a. Responding in Conversation. A Study of Response Articles in Finnish [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 70]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001b. Simple answers to polar questions: The case of Finnish. In Studies in Interactional Linguistics [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 10], Margret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 405–431. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vilkuna, Maria. 1989. Free Word Order in Finnish: Its Syntax and Discourse Functions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue