References (52)
References
Akatsuka, Noriko & Clancy, Patricia M. 1993. Conditionality and deontic modality in Japanese and Korean: Evidence from the emergence of conditionals. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 2: 177–192.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 2007. Deontic conditionals and desirability: Structure and socialization in child-directed speech. In Festschrift for Noriko Akatsuka, Susumu Kuno, Seiichi Makino & Susan Strauss (eds), 1–11. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M., Akatsuka, Noriko & Strauss, Susan. 1997. Deontic modality and conditionality in discourse: A cross-linguistic study of adult speech to young children. In Directions in Functional Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 36], Akio Kamio (ed.), 19–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2007. Grammar in time: The non-restrictive ‘which’-clause as an interactional resource. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 55: 51–82.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Thompson, Sandra A. 2008. On assessing situations and events in conversation: Extraposition and its relatives. Discourse Studies 10(4): 443–467. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Djenar, Dwi Noverini, Ewing, Michael C. & Manns, Howard. 2018. Style and Intersubjectivity in Youth Interaction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2007. Noun phrase structure. In Complex Constructions, Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 2d edn, Vol. 2, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 151–205. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Englebretson, Robert. 2003. Searching for Structure: The Problem of Complementation in Colloquial Indonesian Conversation [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. 1993. Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. Speaking conditionally: Some contexts for if-clauses in conversation. In On Conditionals Again [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 143], Angeliki Athanasiadou & René Dirven (eds), 387–413. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A. & Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In The Language of Turn and Sequence, Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 14–38. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geluykens, Ronald. 1987. Tails (right-dislocations) as a repair mechanism in English conversation. In Getting One’s Words into Line: On Word Order and Functional Grammar, Jan Nuyts & Georges de Schutter (eds), 119–129. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. From Discourse Process to Grammatical Construction: On Left Dislocation in English [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 1]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol (ed.). 2015. How Languages Work. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1979. The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, George Psathas (ed.), 97–121. New York NY: Irvington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne. 2000. From concessive connector to discourse marker: The use of obwohl in everyday German interaction. In Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast, Bernd Kortmann & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 439–468. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2001a. Syntax in the Making: The Emergence of Syntactic Units in Finnish Conversation [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001b. Emerging syntax for interaction: Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interaction. In Studies in Interactional Linguistics [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 10], Margret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 25–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1997. Discourse and the category ‘verb’ in English. Language and Communication 17(2): 93–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. The openness of grammatical constructions. Chicago Linguistic Society 40: 239–256.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Thompson, Sandra A. 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 60: 703–752. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Ono, Tsuyoshi. 2001. “Sentence” in spontaneous spoken Japanese discourse. In Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse, Essays in Honor of Sandra A. Thompson, Joan Bybee & Michael Noonan (eds), 175–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2008. Clause combining and sequenced actions: The Estonian complementizer and evidential particle et. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed.), 125–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koivisto, Aino, Laury, Ritva & Seppänen, Eeva-Leena. 2011. Syntactic and actional characteristics of Finnish etta-clauses. In Subordination in Conversation. A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 24], Ritva Laury & Ryoko Suzuki (eds), 69–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva. 2012. Syntactically non-integrated Finnish jos ‘if’ conditional clauses as directives. Discourse Processes 49: 213–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva & Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2015. Detached NPs with relative clauses in Finnish conversation. In Information Structuring of Spoken Language from a Crosslinguistic Perspective, M. M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest & Robert D. Van Valin (eds), 149–166. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva & Seppänen, Eeva-Leena. 2008. Clause combining, interaction, evidentiality, participation structure and the particle-conjunction continuum. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifuntionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed.), 153–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenz, Edward N. 1993. The Essence of Chaos. Seattle WA: University of Washington Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1997. Noun-modifying Constructions in Japanese: A Frame-semantic Approach [Studies in Language Companion Series 35]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko, Comrie, Bernard & Sells, Peter (eds). 2017. Noun-modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia: Rethinking Theoretical and Geographical Boundaries [Typological Studies in Language 116]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, Jim. 1995. Does spoken language have sentences? In Grammar and Meaning: Essays in Honour of Sir John Lyons, Frank R. Palmer (ed.), 116–135. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mulder, Jean & Thompson, Sandra A. 2008. The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifuntionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed.), 179–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mulder, Jean, Thompson, Sandra A. & Penry Williams, Cara. 2009. Final but in Australian English conversation. In Comparative grammatical studies in Australian and New Zealand English. Grammar and Beyond [Varieties of English Around the World G39], Peter Collins & Pam Peters (eds), 39–359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor & Schieffelin, Bambi B. 1983. Topic as a discourse notion. In Acquisition of Conversational Competence, Elinor Ochs & Bambi B. Schieffelin (eds), 158–174. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Schieffelin, Bambi B. & Platt, Martha. 1979. Propositions across utterances and speakers. In Developmental Pragmatics, Elinor Ochs & Bambi B. Schieffelin (eds), 251–268. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Jones, Kimberly. 2008. Conversation and Grammar: Approaching So-called Conditionals in Japanese. In Junko Mori & Amy Ohta, eds., Japanese Applied Linguistics: Discourse and Social Perspectives. London: Continuum International. 21–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, Laury, Ritva & Suzuki, Ryoko. 2019. Usage-based and Typological Approaches to Linguistic Units. Studies in Language 43:2Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Thompson, Sandra A. 1994. Unattached NPs in English conversation. Berkeley Linguistics Society 20: 402–419. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Japanese (w)atashi/ore/boku ‘I’: They’re not just pronouns. Cognitive Linguistics 14(4): 321–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Fixedness in Japanese adjectives in conversation: Toward a new understanding of a lexical (part-of-speech) category. In Formulaic Language, Vol. 1: Distribution and Historical Change [Typological Studies in Language 82], Roberta Corrigan, Edith A. Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali & Kathleen Wheatley (eds), 117–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, Thompson, Sandra A. & Sasaki, Yumi. 2012. Japanese negotiation through emerging final particles in everyday talk. Discourse Processes 49(3–4): 243–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona. 2010. Emergent grammar for all practical purposes: The on-line formatting of left- and right-dislocations in French conversation. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, Peter Auer & Stefan Pfänder (eds), 45–87. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, De Stefani, Elwys & Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie. 2015. Time and Emergence in Grammar: Dislocation, Topicalization and Hanging Topic in French Talk- in-interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 28]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1992. Conditionals as topics in discourse. Linguistics 30(1): 165–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strogatz, Steven H. 1994. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. Boston MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 1992. NP intonation units and referent identification. BLS 18: 237–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Units in Mandarin Conversation: Prosody, Discourse and Grammar [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2005. The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 481–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Inbar, Maya, Shir Genzer, Anat Perry, Eitan Grossman & Ayelet N. Landau
2023. Intonation Units in Spontaneous Speech Evoke a Neural Response. The Journal of Neuroscience 43:48  pp. 8189 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue