Cover not available

In:The NP-strategy for Expressing Reciprocity: Typology, history, syntax and semantics
Elitzur A. Bar-Asher Siegal
[Typological Studies in Language 127] 2020
► pp. 265–283

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

References

Published online: 4 March 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.127.ref
Aissen, Judith. 1982. Valence and coreference. In Studies in Transitivity [Syntax and Semantics 15], Hopper Paul & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 7–33. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip S. 1999. The Society of Biblibal Literature Handbook of Style for Ancient Near Eastern, Biblical, and Early Christian Studies. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexopoulou, Theodora, Doron, Edit & Heycock, Caroline. 2004. Broad subjects and clitic left dislocation. In Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and Their Effects [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 59], David Adger, Cécile De Cat & George Tsoulas (eds), 329–358. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amsterdamska, Olga. 1987. Schools of Thought: The Development of Linguistics from Bopp to Saussure. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning. 1987. From auxiliary to desinence. In Historical Development of Auxiliaries, Martin Harris & Paolo Ramat (eds), 21–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aoun, Joseph, Elabbas, Benmamoun & Sportiche, Dominique. 1999. Further remarks on first conjunct agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 669–681. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asr, Fatemeh Torabi & Demberg, Vera. 2012. Implicitness of discourse relations. In Proceedings of COLING 2012, Martin Kay & Christian Boitet (eds), 2669–2684. Mumbai: The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atlas, Jay D. 1996. ‘Only’ noun phrases, pseudo-negative generalized quantifiers, negative polarity items and monotonicity. Journal of Semantics 13: 265–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Avanzi, Mathieu, Gendrot, Cédric & Lacheret, Anne. 2010. Is there a prosodic difference between left-dislocated and heavy subjects? Evidence from spontaneous speech. In Every Language, Every Style, Speech Prosody, 5th International Conference, Chicago IL, 10–14 May, 20–30. <[URL]>
Avinery, Isaac. 1964. Yad ha-lashon: otsar leshoni be-seder alef-bet shel ha-nośʾim (Yad ha-lashon: Language Treasures Arranged in Alphabetical Order). Tel Aviv: Yizreʻel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bahat, Yaʻacov & Ron, Mordekhai. 1980. Ṿe-dayeḳ: tiḳune lashon ve-shipur ha-signon (Be Precise: Language Amendments and Style Improvement). Mahad. 2, meḥuseshet. 2th ed.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baldi, Philip. 1975. Reciprocal verbs and symmetric predicates. Linguistische Berichte 36: 13–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baraḳ, Semadar & Gadish, Ronit. 2008. Safah ḳamah: leḳeṭ mi-tokh ha-mador Leshonenu la-ʻam ʻiton ha-Arets 1932–1944 (A Rising Language: Safa qama: selections from the Leshonenu La-am column Haretz, 1932–1944) [Asupot u-mevo’ot ba-lashon Vol. 7]. Jerusalem: ha-Aḳademyah la-lashon ha-ʻIvrit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bar-Asher, Elitzur. 2008. The origin and the typology of the pattern qtil li in Syriac and Babylonian Aramaic. In Sha’arey Lashon: Studies in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Jewish Languages in Honor of Moshe Bar-Asher, Vol. II, Aharon Mamman, Steven Fassberg & Yochanan Breuer (eds), 360–392. Jerusalem: Hebrew University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. A Theory of Argument Realization and its Applications to Features of the Semitic Languages. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. The imperative forms of Proto Semitic and a new perspective on Barth’s Law. Journal of American Oriental Society 128: 233–255.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bar-Asher, Moshe. 2004. The language of Qumran: Between biblical and mishnaic Hebrew (a study in morphology). Meghillot: Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls 2: 137–149Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Mishnaic Hebrew: An introductory survey. In The Literature of the Sages, Second Part, Michael Edward Stone & Shmuel Safrai (eds), 567–595. Amsterdam: Royal Van Gorcum & Philadelphia PA: Fortress Pres Fefrerg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Studies in Modern Hebrew. Jerusalem: The Academy of the Hebrew Language.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Studies in Classical Hebrew. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur. 2011a. Notes on reciprocal constructions in Akkadian in light of typological and historical considerations. Semitica et Classica 4: 23–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. From typology to diachrony: Synchronic and diachronic aspects of predicative possessive constructions in Akkadian. Folia Linguistica Historica 32: 43–88Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Diachronic syntactic studies in Hebrew pronominal reciprocal constructions. In Diachrony in Biblical Hebrew, Cynthia Miller & Ziony Zevit (eds), 209–244. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014a. From a non-argument-dative to an argument-dative: The character and origin of the qṭīl lī construction in Syriac and Jewish Babylonian Aramaic. Folia Orientalia 51: 59–111.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014b. Reciprocal NP-strategies in Jewish dialects of Near Eastern Neo-Aramaic in light of parallel Semitic constructions. Journal of Jewish languages 2: 49–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Hebrew language. Encyclopedia of the Bible and its Reception, Vol. 11, 637–639; 646–665. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015a. Arguments in favor of an ambiguist approach. Paper presented at the Göttingen Workshop on Negation and Polarity, September.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. The case for external sentential negation: Evidence from Jewish Babylonian Aramaic. Linguistics 53: 1031–1078. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016a. Introduction to the Grammar of Jewish Babylonian Aramaic, 2nd, revised and extended edn. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016b. The Semitic templates from the perspective of reciprocal predicates. In Proceedings of the 10th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting 2010, 16–30, 7–10 September, Haifa. <[URL]>
. 2017. The pursuit of science: A study in Saussure’s philosophy of science through the lens of a historical discussion. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft 27: 253–290.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Formal characterizations of bridging contexts". Ms. a paer presented at the conference Formal Diachronic Semantics 4, The Ohio State University, November 2019.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bar-Lev, Moshe Elyashiv. 2018. Free Choice, Homogeneity, and Innocent Inclusion. PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bar-Lev, Moshe E. & Margulis, Daniel. 2014. Hebrew kol: A universal quantifier as an undercover existential. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 18, Urtzi Etxeberria, Anamaria Fălăus, Aritz Irurtzun & Bryan Leferman (eds), 60–76. <[URL]>
Bary, Corien L. 2009. Aspect in Ancient Greek a Semantic Analysis of the Aorist and Imperfective. Nijmegen: Radboud University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassi, Itai & Bar-Lev, Moshe Elyashiv. 2016. A unified existential semantics for bare conditionals. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 21, Robert Truswell, Chris Cummins, Caroline Heycock, Brian Rabern & Hannah Rohde (eds), 22–25. <[URL]>
Beck, Sigrid. 2001. Reciprocals are definites. Natural Language Semantics 9: 69–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beck, Sigrid & von Stechow, Arnim. 2006. Dog after dog revisited. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 10, Christian Ebert & Cornelia Endriss (eds), 43–54. <[URL]>
Beck, Sigrid & Gergel, Remus. 2015. The diachronic semantics of English AGAIN. Natural Language Semantics 23: 157–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana 1982. On the anaphoric status of the reciprocal constructions in Italian. The Linguistic Review 2: 101–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benmamoun, Elabbas, Archna, Bhatia & Polinsky, Maria. 2010. Closest conjunct agreement in head-final languages. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2009: 67–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhat, Shankara D. N. 1978. Pronominalization. Pune: Deccan College.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2005. Long distance agreement in Hindi-Urdu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 757–807. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Walkow, Martin. 2013. Locating agreement in grammar: An argument from agreement in conjunctions. Natural language and Linguistic Theory 31: 951–1013. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2008. Where’s phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In Phi-theory: Phi Features Across Interfaces and Modules, Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds), 295–328. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, Kathryn, Butterfield, Sally, Cutler, Anne, Cutting, J. Cooper, Eberhard, Kathleen M. & Humphreys, Karin R. 2006. Number agreement in British and American English: Disagreeing to agree collectively. Language 82: 64–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L. 1987. ‘Each other’ and its friends. Another Indiana University Linguistics Club Twentieth Anniversary Volume, 1–36. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics club.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosch, Peter, Katz, Graham & Umbach, Carla. 2007. The non-subject bias of German. Anaphors. In Text: Cognitive, formal and Applied Approaches to Anaphoric Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series 86], Monika Schwarz-Friesel, Manfred Consten & Mareile Knees (eds), 145–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2009. Unifying first- and last-conjunct agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27: 455–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel. 1981. An inquiry into the formation of the Middle Aramaic dialects. In Bono Homini Donum: Essays in Historical Linguistics in Memory of J. Alexander Kerns [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 16], Yoël L. Arbeitman (ed.), 613–650. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brame, Michael K. 1977. Alternatives to the tensed and specified subject conditions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 381–411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brisson, Christine. 1998. Distributivity, Maximality, and Floating Quantifiers. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buccellati, Giorgio. 1996. A Structural Grammar of Babylonian. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (ed.), 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere D. & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cable, Seth. 2014. Reflexives, reciprocals and contrast. Journal of Semantics 31: 1–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 2001. What’s wrong with grammaticalization? Language Sciences 23: 113–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cantarino, Vicente. 1975. Syntax of Modern Arabic Prose, Vol. III. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caramazza, Alfonso, Grober, Ellen H., Garvey, Caterine F. & Yates, Jack. 1977. Comprehension of anaphoric pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 16: 601–609. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caudal, Parick. 2015. The passé composé in Old French and Modern French: Evolution or revolution? In Sentence and Discourse, Jacqueline Guéron (ed.), 178–204. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contastiveness, definitness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 25–55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choi, Jongtae. 1994. The Aramaic of Daniel: Its Date, Place of Composition and Linguistic Comparison with Extra-Biblical Texts. PhD dissertation, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, Deerfield IL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of The Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 232–286. New York NY: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Knowledge of Language. Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York NY: Praeger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coghill, Eleanor. 2016. Rise and Fall of Ergativity in Aramaic: Cycles of Alignment Change. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Condoravdi, Cleo & Deo, Ashwini. 2014. Aspect shifts in Indo-Aryan and trajectories of semantic change. In Language Change at the Syntax-Semantics Interface, Chiara Gianollo, Agnes Jäger & Doris Penka (eds), 261–292. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, Edward M. 1994. A new perspective on the language of Onkelos and Jonathan. In The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context, Derek R. G. Beattie & Martin J. McNamara (eds), 142–156. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 2006. Agreement [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalman, Gustaf. 1905. Grammatik des Jüdisch-Palästinischen Aramäisch: Nach Den Idiomen des Palästinischen Talmud, des Onkelostargum und Prophetentargum und der Jerusalemischen Targume. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs Buchhandlung.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary, McHombo, Sam A. & Peters, Stanley. 1994. Semantic similarities and syntactic contrasts between Chicheŵa and English reciprocals. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 145–163.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary, Kanazawa, Makoto, Kim, Yookyung, Mchombo, Sam & Peters, Stanley. 1998. Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 159–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1967a. The Logical form of action sentences. In The Logic of Decision and Action, Nicholas Rescher (ed.), 81–95. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1967b, Causal relations. Journal of Philosophy 64: 691–703. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1970. Mental events. In Experience and Theory, Lawrence Foster & Joe W. Swanson (eds), 79–102. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delitzsch Friedrich. 1889. Assyrian Grammar with Paradigms, Exercises, Glossary and Bibliography. Berlin: H. Reuther.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deo, Ashwini. 2009. Unifying the imperfective and the progressive: Partitions as quantificational domains. Linguistics & Philosophy 32: 475–521. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Formal semantics/pragmatics and language change. In The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds), 393–409. Routledge: Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Diachronic semantics. Annual Review of Linguistics 1: 179–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrick. 2009. Analysing reanalysis. Lingua 119: 1728–1755. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet. 2014. Does innovation need reanalysis? In Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 69], Evie Coussé & Ferdinand von Mengden (eds), 23–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel. 2001. Pluringulars, pronouns and quirky agreement. The Linguistic Review 18: 19–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 2012. Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 3: ??, ?? Further Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doron, Edit. 2016. Introduction. In Language Contact and the Development of Modern Hebrew, 1–22. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doron, Edit & Heycock, Caroline. 1999. Filling and licensing multiple specifiers. In Specifiers: Minimalist Approaches, David Adger, Susan Pintzuk, Bernadette Plunkett & George Tsoulas (eds), 69–89. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. In support of broad subjects in Hebrew. Lingua 120: 1764–1776. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doron, Edit & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2009. A unified approach to reflexivization in Semitic and Romance. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 1: 75–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dougherty, Ray C. 1970. A grammar of coordinate conjoined structures, Part I. Language 46: 850–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dougherty, Ray C. 1974. The syntax and semantics of each other constructions. Foundations of Language 12: 1–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Driver, Godfrey R. 1925. Grammar of the Colloquial Arabic of Syria and Palestine. London: Probsthain & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine. 2006. Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Grammaticalization and semantic reanalysis. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 3, Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds), 2675–2702. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Grammaticalization and Semantic Change. In Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Handbook of Grammaticalization, pp. 389–400. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine & Haug, Dag Trygve Truslew. 2015. Aspect and prefixation in Old Church Slavonic. Diachronica 32: 186- 230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elbourne, Paul. 1999. Some correlations between semantic plurality and quantifier scope. In The North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 29, Nancy Hall, Masako Hirotani & Pius Tamanji (eds), 81–92. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J. 2011. Descriptions of reciprocal situation in Lao. In Evans et al. (eds), 129–147.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erades, Peter A. 1950. Points of modern English Syntax XII. English Studies 31: 153–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2008. Reciprocal constructions: Towards a structural typology. In König & Gast (eds), 33–103.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, Gaby, Alice & Nordlinger, Rachel. 2007. Valency mismatches and the coding of reciprocity in Australian languages. Linguistic Typology 11: 541–597. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, Gaby, Alice, Levinson, Stephen C. & Majid, Asifa (eds). 2011a. Reciprocals and Semantic Typology [Typological Studies in Languages 98]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. Introduction: Reciprocals and semantic typology. In Evans et al. (eds), 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Everaert, Martin. 1990–1. Nominative anaphors in Icelandic: Morphology or syntax? In Issues in Germanic Syntax, Werner Abraham, Wim Kosmeijer & Eric Reuland (eds), 277–305. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Types of anaphoric expressions: Reflexives and reciprocals. In Frajzyngier & Walker (eds), Vol.2, 63–83.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Domain restrictions on reciprocal interpretation. In König & Volker (eds), 557–576.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine. 2001. “Wi(e)der” and “Again(st)”, In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, Caroline Féry & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds), 101–130. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fassberg, Steven. 1990. Grammar of the Palestinian Targum Fragments from the Cairo Genizah. Atlanta GA: Scholars Press.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. The Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialect of Challa. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fiengo, Robert & Lasnik, Howard. 1973. The logical structure of reciprocal sentences in English. Foundations of Language 9: 447–468.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filip, Hana & Carlson, Gregory N. 2001. Distributivity strengthens reciprocity, collectivity weakens it. Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 417–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Fintel, Kai. 1995. The formal semantics of grammaticalization. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society 2, Jill N. Beckman (ed.), 175–198. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Whatever. Semantics and Linguistics Theory 10: 27–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. What is presupposition accommodation, again? Philosophical Perspectives 22: 137–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. 1979. The phases of the Aramaic language. In A Wandering Aramean, 57–84. Chico CA: Scholars Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Danny. 2007. Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. In Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics, Penka Stateva & Uli Sauerland (eds), 71–120. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1999. Coding of the reciprocal function: Two solutions. In Frajzyngier & Walker (eds), 179–194.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Walker, Traci (eds). 1999. Reciprocals: Form and Function, 2 Vols [Typological Studies in Language 40–41]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Walker, Traci originally published as Curl, Traci)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frazer, Mary. 2017. Commentary on therapeutic (Qutāru). Cuneiform Commentaries Project, Eckhart Frahm, Enrique Jiménez, Mary Frazer & Klaus Wagensonner, 2013–2018. <[URL]. DOI: 10079/v41nsdr> (7 march 2018).
Gaby, Alice. 2008. Distinguishing reciprocals from reflexives in Kuuk Thaayorre. In König & Gast (eds), 259–288.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gelb, Ignace J. 1957. Notes on Von Soden’s grammar of Akkadian. Bibliotheca Orientalis 12: 93–111.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gelb, Ignace J., Benno. Landsberger, et al. 1956. The Assyrian Dictionary. Chicago: The Oriental Institute.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2011. The linguistic Cycle. Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geller, Markham J. 2010. Ancient Babylonian Medicine: Theory and Practice. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gendler Szabó, Zoltán. 2000. Problems of Compositionality [PhD Dissertations]. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Adjectives in context. In Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics and Discourse. A Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 90], István Kenesei & Robert M. Harnish (eds), 119 -146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gillon, Brendan S. 1987. The readings of plural noun phrases in English. Linguistics and Philosophy 10: 199–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gleitman, Lila R. 1965. Coordinating conjunctions in English. Language 41: 260–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glinert, Lewis. 1983. The reciprocal structure in Modern Hebrew. In David Gross Anniversary Volume, Kodesh Shlomo (ed.), 196–213. Jerusalem: Hamatmind. (in Hebrew)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. The Grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldenberg, Gideon. 1991. ‘Onself’, ‘one’s own’ and ‘one another’ in Amharic. In Semitic Studies in Honor of Wolf Leslau, Alan S. Kaye. (ed.), 531–549. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Jared R. 2011. The Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Amadya. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds). New York NY: Academic Press. (Reprinted in Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words, 22–40. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Stokhof, Martin. 1984. Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haas, Florian. 2010. Reciprocity in English: Historical Development and Synchronic Structure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Häberl, Charles G. 2009. Neo-Mandaic dialect of Khorramshahr. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haberlandt, Karl & Bingham, Geoffrey. 1978. Verbs contribute to the coherence of brief narratives: Reading related and unrelated sentence triples. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17: 419–425. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine. 2010. On the event relativity of modal auxiliaries. Natural Language Semantics 18: 79–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halevy, Rivka. 2010. Reciprocal constructions in Hebrew. In Judaic Studies in Memory of Moriah Liebson, Maman Ahron & Rivka Bliboim (eds), 265–286. Jerusalem: Hebrew University. (in Hebrew)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011a. The grammaticalization of bipartite reciprocal markers in Hebrew. Hebrew Studies 52: 7–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. Reciprocal constructions between syntax and lexicon. Leshonenu 73: 401–422. (in Hebrew)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37: 1043–1068. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 59], Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds), 17–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Further remarks on reciprocal constructions. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 2087–2115.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasselbach, Rebecca. 2007. External plural markers in Semitic: A new assessment. In Studies in Semitic and Afroasiatic Linguistics Presented to Gene B. Gragg [SAOC 60], Cynthia L. Miller (ed.), 123–138. Chicago IL: The Oriental Institute.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hecker, Karl. 1968. Grammatik der Kültepe-Texte [Analecta Orientalia 44]. Rome: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Irene, Lasnik, Howard & May, Robert. 1991. Reciprocity and plurality. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 63–101.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1994. Grammaticalization as an explanatory parameter. In Perspectives on Grammaticalization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109], William Pagliuca (ed.), 235–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999, Polysemy involving reflexive and reciprocal markers in African languages. In Frajzyngier & Walker (eds), Vol.2, 1–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Miyashita, Hiroyuki. 2008. The intersection between reflexives and reciprocals: A grammaticalization perspective. In König & Gast (eds), 169–2232.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hetzron, Robert. 1972. Ethiopian Semitic: Studies in Classification. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974. La division des langues sémitiques. Actes du premier congrès international de linguistique sémitique et chamito-sémitque, Paris 16–19 juillet, 1969, André Caquot & David Cohen (eds), 181–194. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1975. Genetic classification and Ethiopian Semitic. In Hamito-Semitica, James Bynon & Theodora Bynon (eds), 103–27. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. Two principles of genetic reconstruction. Lingua 38: 89–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline. 1993. Syntactic predication in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2: 167–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline & Doron, Edit. 2003. Categorical subjects. Gengo Kenkyu 123: 95–135.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hicks, Glyn. 2009. The Derivation of Anaphoric Relations [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 139]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1981. Reciprocal interpretation. Journal of Linguistic Research 1: 97–117.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In What Makes Grammaticalization?: A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 21–42. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinterwimmer, Stefan. 2015. A unified account of the properties of German demonstrative pronouns. In The Proceedings of the Workshop on Pronominal Semantics at NELS 40, Patrick Grosz, Pritty Patel-Grosz & Igor Yanovich (eds), 61–107. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirsch, Hans 1963. Die Inschriften der Könige von Agade. Archiv für Orientforschung 20: 1–82.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hobbs, Jerry R. 1979. Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science 3: 67–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, Lawrence. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In Meaning, Form and Use in Context [GURT 1984], Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), 11–42. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. A natural history of negation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Exclusive company: ‘Only’ and the dynamics of vertical inference. Journal of Semantics 13: 1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huehnergard, John & Rubin, Aaron. 2011. Phyla and waves: Models of classification. Semitic languages. In Semitic Lanuages: An International Handbook, Stefan Weninger, Geoffrey Khan, Michael P. Streck & Janet Watson (eds), 259‐278. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hurst, Peter & Nordlinger, Rachel. 2011. Reciprocal constructions in English: Each other and beyond. In Evans et al. (eds), 75–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janda, Richard D. 2001. Beyond ‘pathways’ and ‘unidirectionality’: On the discontinuity of language transmission and the counterability of grammaticalization. Language Sciences 23: 265–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jankowsky, Kurt R. 1972. The Neogrammarians: a re-evaluation of their place in the development of linguistic science. (Janua Linguarum, series minor, 116.) The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jastrow, Otto. 1988. Der neuaramäische Dialekt von Hertevin (Provinz Siirt). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jay, Jonathan. 2009. Reciprocal constructions in Biblical Hebrew. GIALens: Electronic Notes Series 3(1). <[URL]>
Jespersen, Otto. 1949[1913]. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part II, Vol. 1. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 2001. Is there such a thing as “grammaticalization?” Language Sciences 23: 163–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. How accommodating of change is grammaticalization? The case of ‘lateral shifts’. Logos and Language 6: 1–7.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joüon, Paul & Muraoka, Takamitsu. 1991. A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew. Rome: Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans & Reyle, Uwe. 1993. From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Model Theoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kański, Zbigniew. 1987. Logical symmetry and natural language reciprocals. In Proceedings of the 1987 Debrecen Symposium on Logic and Language, 49–68. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1974. Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaufman, Stephen A. 2013. Targum pseudo-Jonathan and late Jewish literary Aramaic. Aramaic Studies 11: 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, Janice M., Baillet, Susan D. & Brown, Polly. 1984. The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 232: 115–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kehler, Andrew, Kertz, Laura, Rohde, Hannah & Elman, Jeffrey L. 2008. Coherence and coreference revisited. Journal of Semantics 25: 1–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The Middle Voice: A Typological and Diachronic Study [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Khan, Geoffrey. 1999. A Grammar of Neo-Aramaic: The Sialect of the Jews of Arbel. Boston MA: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. The Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Qaraqosh. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. The Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Sulemaniyya and Ḥalabja. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008a. The expression of definiteness in North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic dialects. In Aramaic in its Historical Setting, Holger Gzella & Margaretha L. Folmer (eds), 209–226. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008b. The Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Barwar. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Left dislocation in North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic dialects. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus 50: 91–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Yooking & Peters, Stanley. 1998. Semantic and pragmatic context-dependence: The case ofreciprocals. In Barbosa, is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax, Danny Fox Pilar, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis & David Pesetsky (eds), 221–248. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul & Condoravdi, Cleo. 2006. Tracking Jespersen’s cycle. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory, Mark Janse, Brian D. Joseph & Angela Ralli (eds), 172–197. Mytilene: Doukas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Goran. 1982. Each other and one another: On the use of the English reciprocal pronouns. English Studies 63: 231–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knjazev, Jurij P. 1998. Towards a typology of grammatical polysemy: Reflexive markers as markers of reciprocity. In Typology of Verbal Categories, Leonid Kulikov & Heinz Vater (eds), 185–93. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Reciprocal constructions in Russian. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 673–708. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard. 2011. Reciprocals and semantic typology: Some concluding remarks. In Evans et al. (eds), 327–339.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Reciprocals. In Oxford Biblioraphy in Linguistics, <[URL]>
König, Ekkehard & Shigehiro Kokutani. 2006. Towards a typology of reciprocal constructions: Focus on German and Japanese. Linguistics 44: 271–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Gast, Volker (eds). 2008. Reciprocals and Reflexives – Theoretical and Cross-linguistic Explorations [Trends in Linguistics 192]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008a. Reciprocity and reflexivity – description, typology and theory. In König & Gast (eds), 1–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koster, Jan. 1987. Domains and Dynasties: The Radical Autonomy of Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, Norbertus J. C. 1997. Gemination in the Akkadian Verb [Studia Semitica Neerlandica 32]. Assen: Van Gorcum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. The notional category of modality. In Words, Worlds and Contexts, Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer & Hannes Rieser (eds), 38–74. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Modality. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 639–650. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kremers, Joost. 1997. How Arabs Speak to Each Other about Themselves: A Study of nafs and baʿḍ in Modern Standard Arabic. MA thesis, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1996. Pragmatic strengthening in plural predications and donkey sentences. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 6: 136–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Križ, Manuel. 2015. Aspects of Homogeneity in the Semantics of Natural Language. PhD dissertation, University of Vienna.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Homogeneity, non-maximality, and all. Journal of Semantics 33: 1–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kropotkin, Pëtr. 1902. Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution. London: HeinemannGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kruspe, Nicole. 2011. Reciprocal constructions in Mah Meri. In Evans et al. (eds), 149–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid. 2007. Reciprocal constructions in Vedic. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 709–738.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuperberg, Gina R., Paczynski, Martin & Ditman, Tali. 2011. Establishing causal coherence across sentences: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23: 1230–1246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1986. Movement of noun phrases in Japanese. In Issues in Japanese Linguistics, Takashi Imai & Mamoru Saito (eds), 229–272. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1975[1965]. The evolution of grammatical categories. In Esquisses linguistiques II, Jerzy Kuryłowicz (ed.), 38–54. München: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kutscher, Edward Yechezkel. 1971. Aramaic. In Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 3, 259–287. New York NY: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1977. Aramaic, Linguistics in South West Asia and North Africa ]Current Trends in Linguistics 6[, 347–412. The Hague: Mouton. (=Kutscher E.Y. Hebrew and Aramaic Studies, Jerusalem 1977, 90–155.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuular, Klara B. 2007. Reciprocals, sociatives, comitatives, and assistives in Tuvan. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 1163–1229.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Peter, Stanley. 1966. Phrasal conjunction and symmetric predicates. In Mathematical Linguistics and Automatic Translation Report [NSF-27], VI/1–49. Cambridge MA: Harvard Computation Laboratory (reprinted in Modern Studies in English, David Reibel & Sanford A. Schane (eds), 113–142. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1969.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2006. Chain resolution in Hebrew V(P)‐fronting. Syntax 9: 32–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. Syntactic reanalysis. In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, Charles N. Li (ed), 57–139. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langendoen, D. Terence. 1978. The logic of reciprocity. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 177–197.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lasersohn, Peter Nathan. 2012. Contextualism and compositionality. Linguistics and Philosophy 35: 171–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lebeaux, David. 1983. A distributional difference between reciprocals and reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 723–728.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Yo-Seob. 2016. Description of the BH lexeme el: A Cognitive Approach. MA thesis, Stellenbosch University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leslau, Wolf. 2000. Introductory Grammar of Amharic. Wiesbaden: Harassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Magnus. 2001. Agreement with collective nouns in English [Lund Studies in English 103]. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Collective nouns and language change. English Language and Linguistics 10: 321–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1973. Causation. Journal of Philosophy 70: 556–567. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1977. A Mechanism of the development of copula morphemes. In Mechanism of Syntactic Change, Charles N. Li (ed.), 419–444. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1985. Multiple uses of reciprocal constructions. Australian Journal of Linguistics 5: 19–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Reflexives and reciprocals. In The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol. 7, edited by R. E. Asher (editor-in-chief), 3504–3509. Oxford: PergamGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Reciprocals without reflexive. In Frajzyngier & Walker (eds), 31–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1999. The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macdonell, Arthur. A. 1927. A Sanskrit Grammar for Students. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maclean, Arthur John. 1895. Grammar of the Dialects of Vernacular Syriac as Spoken by the Eastern Syrians of Kurdistan, North-West Persia, and the Plain of Mosul with Notices of the Vernacular of the Jews of Azerbaijan and of Zakhu Near Mosul. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macuch, Rudolf. 1965. Handbook of Classical and Modern Mandaic. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Magri, Giorgio. 2014. An account for the homogeneity effects triggered by plural definites and conjunction based on double strengthening. In Pragmatics, Semantics and the Case of Scalar Implicatures, Salvatore Pistoia Reda (ed.), 99–145. Houndmills: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Evans, Nicholas & Gaby, Alice. 2011. The semantics of reciprocal constructions across languages: A extensional approach. In Evans et al. (eds), 29–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malamud, Sophia A. 2012. The meaning of plural definites: A decision-theoretic approach. Semantics and Pragmatics 5: 1–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mann, Willianm C. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1986. Relational propositions in discourse. Discourse Processes 9: 57–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marušič, Franc, Nevins, Andrew & Badecker, Bill. 2015. The grammars of conjunction agreement in Slovenian. Syntax 18: 39–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maslova, Elena. 1999. Reciprocals and set construal. In Frajzyngier & Walker (eds), 161–178.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Reciprocal and polyadic (remarkable reciprocals in Bantu). In Nedjalkov (ed.), 335–352.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Reflexive encoding of reciprocity: Cross-linguistic and language-internal variation. In König & Gast (eds), 225–257.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mari, Alda. 2014. Each other, asymmetry and reasonable futures. Journal of Semantics 31: 209–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mathesius, Vilém. 1928. On linguistic characterology with illustrations from Modern English. In Acted du Premier Congrès International de Linguistes à La Haye, 56–63. Leiden: W.A. Sijthoff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maul, Stefan M. 2009. Die Lesung der Rubra dù.dù.bi und kìd.kìd.bi. Orientalia NS 78: 69–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDaniels, Todd. 2003. What’s wrong with reanalysis? Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 81–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGregor, William B. 1999. Reflexive and reciprocal constructions in Nyulnyulan languages. In Frajzyngier & Walker (eds), 85–122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merin, Artur. 2003. Formal Semantic Theory and Diachronic Data: A Case Study in Grammaticalization [Arbeitsbericht des Sonderforschungsbereich 340. No. 75). Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart. <[URL]>
de Meyer, Leon. 1962. L’accadien des Contrats de Suse. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montague, Richard. 1970. Universal grammar. Theoria 36: 373–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mor, Uri. 2015. Judean Hebrew: the language of the Hebrew documents from Judea between the first and the second revolts. Jerusalem: The Academy of The Hebrew Language.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morag, Shelomo. 1988. Vocalised Talmudic Manuscripts in the Cambridge Genizah Collections, Vol. I. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moshkovitz, Yechiel T. 1985. Sēfer Yəḥezkēl: Daʽat Mikrâ. Jerusalem: The Rabbi Kook Institution Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munn, Alan. 1999. First-conjunct agreement: Against a clausal analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 643–668. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muraoka, Takamitsu. 2011. A Grammar of Qumran Aramaic [Ancient Near Eastern Studies Supplement Series 38]. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murray, John D. 1997. Logical connectives and local coherence. In Sources of Coherence in Reading, Robert F. Lorch & Edward J. O’Brien (eds), 107–125. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murray, Sarah. 2008. Reflexivity and reciprocity with(out) underspecification. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12, Alte Grøn (ed.), 455–469. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mutzafi, Hezy. 2004. The Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Koy Sanjaq (Iraqi Kurdistan). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. The Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Betanure (province of Dihok). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Heine, Bernd. 2011. Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. (ed.). 2007. Reciprocal Constructions, 5 Vols [Typological Studies in Language 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007a. Overview of the research: Definitions of terms, framework, and related issues. In Nedjalkov (ed.) 3–114.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007b. Encoding of the reciprocal meaning. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 147–208.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007c. Polysemy of reciprocal markers. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 251–333.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Geniušienė, Emma Š. 2007. Questionnaire on reciprocals. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 379–434.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor & Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 2007a. Reciprocal, sociative and competitive constructions in Karachay-Balkar. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 969–1019. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor & Nedjalkov, Vladimir. 2007b Reciprocals, sociatives, comitatives, and assistives in Yakut". In Nedjalkov (ed.), 1095–1161.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neishtadt, Mila. 2015. The lexical component in the Aramaic substrate of Palestinian Arabic. In Semitic Languages in Contact, Aaron Michael Butts (ed.), 280–310. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick. 2001. Deconstructing grammaticalization. Language Sciences 23: 187–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nöldeke, Thodore. 1875. Mandäische Grammatik. Halle: Waisenhaus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Compendious Syriac Grammar, transl. by Peter T. Daniels. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partridge, Eric. 1957. Usage and Abusage, 5th edn. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. 1972. A note on syntactic and semantic number in English. Linguistic Inquiry 3: 243–246.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Philip, Willian. 2000. Adult and child understanding of simple reciprocal sentences. Language 76: 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pietroski, Paul M. 2015. Framing events variables. Erkenntnis 80: 31–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 2008. Thoughts on the origin, progress, and pronominal status of reciprocal forms in Germanic, occasioned by those of Bavarian. In König & Gast (eds), 347–373.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poesio, Massimo. 1994. Ambiguity, underspecification, and discourse interpretation. In International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Harry Bunt, Reinhard Muskens & Gerrit Rentier (eds), 151–160. Tilburg: University of Tilburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poortman, Eva B., Struiksma, Martin E., Kerem, Nir, Friedmann, Naama & Winter, Yoad. 2018. Reciprocal expressions and the maximal typicality hypothesis. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3: 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potter, Simon. 1953. The expression of reciprocity. English Studies 34: 252–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rabin, Chaim. 1958. The historical background of Qumran Hebrew. Scripta Hierosolymitana 4: 144–161.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Rabin, The Development of the Syntax of Post-Biblical Hebrew (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics, 29), Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rapold, Christian J. 2011. Semantics of Khoekhoe reciprocal constructions. In Evans et al. (eds), 61–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rawlins, Kyle. 2015. Indifference and scalar inferences in free relatives. In Epistemic Indefinites: Exploring Modality Beyond the Verbal Domain, Luis Alonso-Ovalle & Paula Menéndez-Benito (eds), 267–288. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1995. Interface Strategies. Utrecht: OTS Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Siloni, Tal. 2005. The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 389–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rendsburg, Gary A. 1990. Diglossia in Ancient Hebrew. New Haven CT: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
del Río Sánchez, Francisco. 2013. Influences of Aramaic on Dialectal Arabic. In Archaism and Innovation in the Semitic Languages, Juan Pedro Monferrer-Sala & Wilfred G. E. Watson (eds), 129–136. Córdoba: Oriens Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Craige. 1987. Modal Subordination, Anaphora, and Distributivity. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics 5: 1–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2007. Diachronic Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna. 2003. Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Rooij, Robert & Schulz, Robert Katrin. 2007. Only: Meaning and implicatures. In Questions in Dynamic Semantics, Aloni Maria, Alastair Butler & Paul Dekker (eds), 193–223. London: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1973. On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, Timothy E. Moore (ed.), 111–144. New York NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor & Mervis, Carolyn B. 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7: 573–605. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rubin, Aaron D. 2005. Studies in Semitic Grammaticalization [Harvard Semitic Series 57]. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. The subgrouping of the Semitic languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 79–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. The Mehri Language of Oman. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rudolph, Udo & Friedrich Försterling. 1997. The psychological causality implicit in verbs: A review. Psychological Bulletin 121: 192–218Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sabar, Yona. 2002. A Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dictionary: Dialects of Amidya, Dihok, Nerwa and Zakho, northwestern Iraq; Based on Old and New Manuscripts, Oral and Written Bible Translations, Folkloric Texts, and Diverse Spoken Registers, with an Introduction to Grammar and Semantics, and an Index of Talmudic Words which have Reflexes in Jewish Neo-Aramaic. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sabato, Sivan & Winter, Yoad. 2012. Relational domains and the interpretation of reciprocals. Linguistics and Philosophy 35: 191–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salonen, Erkki. 1962. Untersuchungen zur Schrift und Sprache des Altbabylonischen von Susa, mit Berücksichtigung der Mâlamir-Texte. Helsinki: Societas Orientalis Fennica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted. 2005. Coherence, causality and cognitive complexity in discourse. In Proceedings/Actes SEM-05, First International Symposium on the Exploration and Modelling of Meaning, 105–114. Biarritz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted. J. & Noordman, Leo G. 2000. The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes 29: 37–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1931. Southern Paiute, a Shoshonean language. Texts of the Kaibab Paiutes and Uintah Utes. Southern Paiute Dictionary [Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 65]. Boston MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sauerland, Uli. 1998. Plurals, derived, and reciprocals. The Interpretive Tract: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 25: 177–204.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004a. “A team,” definitely. Snippets 9: 11–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004b. A Comprehensive Semantics for Agreement. Montreal: McGill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger. 1996. Pluralities. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Segal, Erwin M., Duchan, Judith F. & Scott, Paula J. 1991. The role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring: Evidence from adults’ interpretations of simple stories. Discourse Processes 14: 27–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Segal, Moses H. 1908. Mišnaic Hebrew and its relation to Biblical Hebrew and Aramaic. Jewish Quarterly review 20: 647–737. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1927. Grammar of Mishnaic Hebrew. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1936 Diqduq lešon ha-mišna. Tel-Aviv: Devir.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharvit, Shimon. 2006. Language and Style of Avoth through the Ages. Beer-Sheva: Ben Gurion University of the Negev Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sichel, Ivy. 2001. Studies in the Syntax of Features and Pronouns. Phd dissertation, CUNY.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Demonstrative pronouns and anaphora. In Hebrew Theoretical Linguistics, Galia Hatav (ed.), 279–307. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University Magnes Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. New evidence for the structural realization of the implicit external argument in nominalizations. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 712–723. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sichel, Ivy & Wiltschko, Martina. 2018. Demonstrative pronouns and the linguistic encoding of appraisal. In WCCFL 36: Proceedings of the 36th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, William G. Bennett, Lindsay Hracs & Dennis Ryan (eds), 365–373. Sommerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siloni, Tal. 2001. Reciprocal verbs. In Proceedings of the Israeli Association of Theoretical Linguistics 17, Yehuda N. Falk (ed.). Jerusalem: IATL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Active lexicon. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 383–400.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. On the Hitpa’el template. In Theoretical Hebrew Linguistics, Galia Hatav (ed.), 111–138. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University Magnes Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Reciprocal verbs and symmetry. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30: 261–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinha, Jasmin. 2000. Der neuostaramäische Dialekt von Bēṣpän (Provinz Mardin, Südosttürkei): Eine grammatische Darstellung. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sitaridou, Ioanna. 2014. Modality, antiveridicality and complementation: The Romeyka infinitive as a negative polarity item. Lingua 148: 118–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sivan, Reuven. 1979. Leḳsiḳon le-shipur ha-lashon, 3rd edn. Jerusalem: Devir.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Edward E., Shoben, Edward J. & Rips, Lance J. 1974. Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review 81: 214–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith. Peter, W. 2017. The syntax of semantic agreement in English. Journal of Linguistics 53: 823–863. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sobin, Nicholas. 1997. Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 318–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sokoloff, Michael. 2002. A Dictionary of Jewish Babylonian Aramaic of the Talmudic and Geonic Periods. Ramat-Gan: Bar Ilan University Press; Baltimore MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Solstad, Torgrim & Bott, Oliver. 2017. Causality and causal reasoning in natural language. In The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning, Michael R. Waldmann (ed.), 619–644. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spector, Benjamin. 2013. Homogeneity and plurals: From the strongest meaning hypothesis to supervaluations. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 18, Urtzi Etxeberria, Anamaria Fălăus, Aritz Irurtzun & Bryan Leferman (eds). <[URL]>
Spector Shirtz, Ilona. 2014. The Syntax of Non-verbal Predication in Modern Hebrew: Predicate Nominals, Pseudoclefts and Clefts. PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stadel, Christian. 2013. Morphosyntax of Samaritan Aramaic. Jerusalem: The Bialik Institute.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1973. Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 447–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1978. Assertion. In Pragmatics [Syntax and Semantics ], Peter Cole (ed.), 315–332. New York NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. On the representation of context. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7: 3–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stein, David E. S. 2008. The noun אִישׁ (’îš) in Biblical Hebrew: A term of affiliation. Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 8: 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stuurman, Frits. 1987. Each other – one another: ‘There will always prove to be a difference’. English Studies 68: 353–360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sulkala, Helena & Karjalainen, Merja. 1992. Finnish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tadmor, Hayim. 1958. Historical implications of the correct rendering of Akkadian dâku. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 17: 129–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talay, Shabo. 2008. Die neuaramäischen Dialekte der Khabur-Assyrer in Nordostsyrien: Einführung, Phonologie und Morphologie. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Testen, David. 1998. The derivational role of the Semitic N-Stem. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie 88: 127–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thackston, Wheeler M. 2006. Kurmanji Kurdish: A Reference Grammar with Selected Readings. Diyarbakir: Renas Media.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomason, Richmond H. 1990. Accommodation, meaning, and implicature: Interdisciplinary foundations for pragmatics. In Intentions in Communication, Philip Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha Pollack (eds), 325–363. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1979. On Complementation in Icelandic. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trabasso, Tom & van den Broek, Paul. 1985. Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language 24: 612–630. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Heine, Bernd. 1991. Introduction. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol I [Typologial Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Dasher, Richard. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trivers, Robert L. 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology 46: 35–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef. 1966. The Linguistic School of Prague: An Introduction to its Theory and Practice. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vezzosi, Letizia. 2010. Micro-process of grammaticalization: The case of Italian l’un l’altro. In Grammaticalization: Current Views and Issues [Studies in Language Companion Series 119], Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König (eds), 343–372. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus. 1963. An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Part 1: Syntactical Units with One Verb. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voigt, Rainer. 2001. Semitische Verwandtschaftstermini. In New Data and New Methods in Afroasiatic Linguistics: Robert Hetzron in Memoriam, Andrzej Zaborski (ed.), 205–218. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Von Soden, Wolfram. 1931. Der hymnisch-epische Dialekt des Akkadischen. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Aarchäologie 40: 163–227.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1933. Der hymnisch-epische Dialekt des Akkadischen. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 41: 90–183.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1952. Grundriss der akkadischen Grammatik [GAG]. Rome: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Waal, Frans. 2005. How animals do business. Scientific American 292: 72–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin I. 1968. Directions for historical linguistics. In Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change, Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 95–188. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werner, Arnold. 1991. Das Neuwestaramäische IV. Orale Literatur aus Maʿlūla [Semitica Viva; Bd. 4/IV]. Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willer-Gold, Jana, Arsenijević, Boban, Batinić, Mia, Čordalija Nermina, Kresić, Marijana, Leko, Nedžad, Marušič, Franc Lanko, Milićev, Tanja, Milićević, Nataša, Mitić, Ivana, Nevins, Andrew, Peti-Stantić, Anita, Stanković, Branimir, Šuligoj, Tina& Tušek, Jelena. 2016. Conjunct agreement and gender in South Slavic: From theory to experiments to theory. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 24: 187–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1991. Reciprocal scope. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 159–173.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, Yoad. 2018. Symmetric predicates and the semantics of reciprocal alternations. Semantic and Pragmatics 11: 1–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, Anna A. & Shmelev, Aleksej D. 2007. Sociativity, conjoining, reciprocity and the Latin Prefix com-. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 209–229.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedzer Hugo. 2004. Sentential Negation and Negative Concord, PhD Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue