In:The NP-strategy for Expressing Reciprocity: Typology, history, syntax and semantics
Elitzur A. Bar-Asher Siegal
[Typological Studies in Language 127] 2020
► pp. 151–182
Chapter 5Changing meaning of the NP-strategy constructions
Published online: 4 March 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.127.c5
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.127.c5
Article outline
- 5.1Introduction
- 5.2One-unit anaphors and adverbs
- 5.2.1The adverbial strategy for expressing reciprocity
- 5.2.2Defining the adverbial strategy for expressing reciprocity
- 5.3The Akkadian expression ah̬āmiš
- 5.3.1ah̬āmiš as an anaphor
- 5.3.2A putative shift: One-unit anaphor > adverb
- 5.4Strategies for encoding reciprocity versus collective, sociative and comitative expressions
- 5.4.1Collective, sociative and comitative expressions
- 5.4.2Shifts in meaning between the conceptual categories of reciprocity and sociativity
- 5.5The origin of the Akkadian one-unit anaphor ah̬āmiš
- 5.6Summary and discussion of formal analyses of changes in meaning
- 5.7Appendix: An observation found in an ancient text on the grammatical relationship between the reciprocal and the sociative domains
Notes
