In:Diverse Scenarios of Syntactic Complexity
Edited by Albert Álvarez González, Zarina Estrada-Fernández and Claudine Chamoreau
[Typological Studies in Language 126] 2019
► pp. 167–189
Syntactic nominalizations in Pima Bajo
Diachronic diversity
Published online: 4 July 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.126.07est
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.126.07est
Pima Bajo is a Uto-Aztecan language from northwestern Mexico, traditionally spoken in the central part of the states of Chihuahua and Sonora. It is the most endangered language in the Uto-Aztecan family, a situation partially responsible for the loss of some remarkable features observed in complex clauses, in particular, syntactic nominalizations. This paper focuses on syntactic nominalization constructions in Pima Bajo involving three nominalizing suffixes, -dam, -kɨg, and -ka. These nominalization strategies are consonant with Comrie (2011) and Malchukov (2004), especially in that they have a mixed status, combining nominal as well as verbal properties. Additionally, these constructions should not be considered discrete, but gradual along a continuum. Moreover, the relevant properties that are observed within the different types of nominalizations mixed or not, follow a hierarchical organization, since not all of them are relevant within the different instantiations of this kind of constructions.
Keywords: clausal nominalizations, mixed status, subordination, Pima Bajo
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Sociolinguistic information and grammatical properties of Pima Bajo
- 3.Clausal nominalization
- 4.Syntactic nominalizations in Pima Bajo
- 4.1The suffix -dam
- 4.2The nominalizing suffix -kig
- 4.3The nominalizing suffix -ka
- 5.Final remarks
Acknowledgements Abbreviations Notes References
References (30)
Bisang, Walter. 2001. 100. Finite vs non-finite languages. In Language Typology and Language Universals. An International Handbook, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1400–1430. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
. 2016. Finiteness, nominalization, and information structure: Convergence and divergence. In Finiteness and Nominalization [Typological Studies in Language 113], Claudine Chamoreau & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds), 13–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Comrie, Bernard & Thompson, Sandra A. 2007[1985]. Lexical nominalization. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and Lexicon, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 334–381. Cambridge: CUP.
Dakin, Karen 2004. Prólogo. In Diccionario yaqui-español y textos. Obra de preservación lingüística, Zarina Estrada Fernández, Crescencio Buitimea Valenzuela, Adriana E. Gurrola Camacho, María E. Castillo Celaya & Anabela Carlón Flores (eds), 13–25. México: Plaza y Valdez.
Estrada-Fernández, Zarina. 2012. From demonstrative to relative marker to clause linker. Relative clause formation in Pima Bajo. In Relative Clauses in Languages of the Americas. A Typological Overview [Typological Studies in Language 102], Bernard Comrie & Zarina Estrada-Fernández, 127–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2016. Exploring finiteness and non-finiteness in Pima Bajo. In Finiteness and Nominalization [Typological Studies in Language 113], Claudine Chamoreau & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds), 43–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2018. Estructura de la información y expresión de tópico y foco en lenguas yuto-aztecas de la Sierra Tarahumara. Revista Línguas Indígenas Americanas (LIAMES). 18(1): 7–24.
Estrada-Fernández, Zarina. In press. Grammaticalization in Uto-Aztecan languages from northwestern Mexico. In Areal Patterns of Grammaticalization, Walter Bisang & Andrej Malchukov (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Estrada-Fernández, Zarina & Villalpando-Quiñónez, Jesús. Forthcoming. Clause combining and nominalization in Tarahumara: Towards a diachronic source of clausal nominalizing suffixes. Submitted to Amerindia
.
Genetti, Carol, Bartee, Ellen, Coupe, Alexander R., Hildebrandt, Kristine & Lin, You-Jin. 2008. Syntactic aspects of nominalization in five Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayan area. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 3(1–2): 97–143.
Givón, T. 2009. The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Hope, Margarita. 2006. Pimas. México: Comisión Nacional para el Desarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas. Col. Pueblos Indígenas de México Contemporáneo.
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 60(4): 703–752.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2013. Action nominal constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (10 September 2014).
Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar, Vol. I: An Overview of Uto-Aztecan Grammar. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics/University of Texas at Arlington.
Malchukov, Andrej L. 2004. Nominalization/verbalization: Constraining Typology of Transcategorial Operations. Munich: Lincom.
Miller, Wick R. 1983. Uto-Aztecan. In Southwest. Handbook of North American Indians, Alfonso Ortiz (ed.), 113–124. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution.
Mithun, Marianne. 2016. Shifting finiteness in nominalization: From definitization to refinitization. In Finiteness and Nominalization [Typological Studies in Language 113], Claudine Chamoreau & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds), 297–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Moyse-Faurie, Claire. 2016. Referential markers in Oceanic nominalized constructions. In Finiteness and Nominalization [Typological Studies in Language 113], Claudine Chamoreau & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds), 171–203. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
