In:Nominalization in Languages of the Americas:
Edited by Roberto Zariquiey, Masayoshi Shibatani and David W. Fleck
[Typological Studies in Language 124] 2019
► pp. 419–454
Chapter 11Form and functions of nominalization in Wampis
Published online: 8 August 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.124.11pen
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.124.11pen
This paper examines the main morphosyntatic and functional properties of nominalization in Wampis, a Jivaroan (or Chicham) language spoken in Peru. In addition to having derivational properties, nominalized structures are used extensively in Wampis for a variety of functions, including relativization and complementation. This paper also shows that nominalized stems are expanding their functions to those equivalent to predicating structures, such that they are able to predicate on their own and receive finite verbal morphology.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background and grammatical sketch
- 2.1Parts of speech
- 2.1.1Adjectives
- 2.1.2Nouns and noun phrases
- 2.1.3Verbs
- 2.2Finiteness and structure of the clause
- 2.1Parts of speech
- 3.Overview of Wampis nominalizations
- 4.Lexical nominalization
- 4.1Set I Agentive S/A nominalizer -inu
- 4.2Set I Future nominalizer -tinu
- 4.3Set I Action nominalizer -ta
- 4.4Set I Non-agentive nominalizer -taĩ
- 4.5Set II Subject nominalizer -u
- 4.6Set II Non-subject nominalizer -mau
- 5.Grammatical nominalization: Structure and functions
- 5.1Internal and external structure
- 5.2Relativization
- 5.2.1Non-future relativization
- 5.2.2Future relativization
- 5.3Nominalizations as arguments
- 5.3.1Complementation
- 5.3.2Complements of verbs of movement
- 5.4Adverbial modification
- 5.4.1Temporal and reason modification with -mau =nVma
- 5.4.2Purpose modification with Set I future nominalizer -tinu
- 5.5Copy-verb construction
- 5.6Main clause constructions involving nominalizations
- 5.6.1Indefinite/Distant future with Set I future nominalizer -tinu
- 5.6.2Habitualness with Set I S/A nominalizer -inu
- 5.6.3Habitual Past=hak with Set II -u and -mau
- 5.6.4Potential and deontic sense V-mai + Set I -inu
- 5.6.5Normative with Set I non-agentive -taĩ
- 6.From nominalizations to finite structures
- 7.Conclusion
Abbreviations Notes References
References (32)
Ahland, Michael. 2015. The development of finite verbs from nominalized structures in Northern Mao. Paper presented at the 46th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, University of Oregon.
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language, Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), 329–334. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2007. Deconstructing categories: Finiteness in a functional-typological perspective. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 91–114. Oxford: OUP.
DeLancey, Scott. 1986. Relativization as nominalization in Tibetan and Newari. Paper presented at the 19th International Conference of Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics.
. 1999. Relativization in Tibetan. In Studies in Nepalese Linguistics, Yogendra Yadava & Warren Glover (eds), 231–249. Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.
. 2011. Finite structures from clausal nominalization in Tibeto-Burman. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 343–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dixon, Robert M.W. 2006. Complement clauses and complementation strategies in typological perspective. In Complementation: A Cross-linguistic Perspective, Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 1–48. Oxford: OUP.
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.
Fast, Gerhard, Warkentin de Fast, Ruby & Fast Warkentin, Daniel. 1996. Diccionario Achuar-Shiwiar~Castellano, 2 edn. Yarinacocha: Ministerio de Educación/Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.
Genetti, Carol, Coupe, Alexander R., Bartee, Ellen, Hildebrandt, Kristine & You-Jing, Lin. 2008. Syntactic aspects of nominalization in five Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayan area. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 31(2): 97–143.
Gildea, Spike. 2008. Explaining similarities between main clauses and nominalized phrases. In La structure des langues amazoniennes, Ana Carla Bruno, Frantomé Pacheco, Francesc Queixalós & Leo Wetzels (eds). Amerindia 32: 57–75.
2012. Toward a diachronic typology of relative clause. In Relative Clauses in Languages of the Americas: A Typological Overview [Typological Studies in Language 102], Bernard Comrie & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds), 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goldenberg, Gideon. 1998. Tautological infinitive. In Studies in Semitic Linguistics: Selected Writings, 36–85. Jerusalem: Magnes Press, Hebrew University.
Good, Jeff. 2003. Clause combining in Chechen. Studies in Language 27(1): 113–170.
Güldemann, Tom. 2003. Present progressive vis-à-vis predication focus in Bantu: A verbal category between semantics and pragmatics. Studies in Language 27(2): 323–360.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2005. The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar: Typological characteristics. In The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds), 110–181. London: Routledge.
Jakway, Martha, Horacio, Lorenzo C. & Arturo, Antonio A. 1987. Vocabulario huambisa, 2 edn. Yarinacocha, Pucallpa: Ministerio de educación/Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.
Katan Jua, Tuntiak. 2011. Ii chichame unuimiamu / Investigando nuestra lengua / Investigating our language: Shuar Chicham. In Endangered languages: Voices and images. Proceedings of the FEL XV Annual Conference, Marleen Haboud & Nicholas Ostler (eds), 103–105. Bath: Foundation for Endangered Languages.
Keenan, Edward L. 1985. Relative clauses. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II: Complex Constructions, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 141–170. Cambridge: CUP.
Matissof, James A. 1972. Lahu nominalization, relativization, and genitivization. In Syntax and Semantics, John P. Kimball (ed.), 237–357. New York NY: Seminar Press.
Noonan, Michael. 1985. Complementation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II: Complex Constructions, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 42–140. Cambridge: CUP.
. 1997. Versatile nominalizations. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givón, Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 373–394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Overall, Simon. 2007. A grammar of Aguaruna. PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.
. 2014. Nominalization, knowledge, and information source in Aguaruna (Jivaroan). In The Grammar of Knowledge: A Cross-linguistic Typology, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds), 227–244. Oxford: OUP.
Pellizaro, Siro M. & Fausto Oswaldo Náwech. 2005. Chicham: Diccionario shuar-castellano. Quito: Abya-Yala.
Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten. 2009. A Typology of Purpose Clauses [Typological Studies in Language 88]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 2009. Elements of complex structures – where recursion isn’t: The case of relativization. In Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Acquisition, Neuro-cognition, Evolution, [Typological Studies in Language 85], T. Givón & Masayoshi Shibatani (eds), 163–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yap, Foon Ha, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona. 2011. Introduction: Nominalization strategies in Asian languages. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], 1–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
