In:Nominalization in Languages of the Americas:
Edited by Roberto Zariquiey, Masayoshi Shibatani and David W. Fleck
[Typological Studies in Language 124] 2019
► pp. 341–362
Chapter 8On habitual periphrasis in Cuzco Quechua
Published online: 8 August 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.124.08cah
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.124.08cah
In Cuzco Quechua, a periphrastic construction composed of a lexical subject nominalization in conjunction with the copula is used to express habitual events anchored in the past, regardless of formal tense marking. The aim of this paper is to analyze the construction and evaluate its diachronic development with respect to established grammaticalization clines of past habitual. The variation appears to be the direct result of an on-going process which replicates, in part, an established grammaticalization pathway of past-habitual grams (Bybee et al. 1994). This process of language change sheds light both on the pathway mentioned and reasserts the claim that nominalizations serve source for main clause morphology (Gildea 2008).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The aspectual selva oscura of habitual constructions
- 3.Past Habitual Periphrasis in Cuzco Quechua – Form and function(s)
- 4.The emergence and expansion of the construction
- 5.Concluding remarks
Acknowledgments Abbreviations Notes References
References (40)
Adelaar, Willem F. H. 1977. Tarma Quechua: Grammar, Texts, Dictionary. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.
AQW = See Mamani et al.
Benveniste, Émile. 1970. The linguistic functions of to be and to have. In Problems in General Linguistics, Mary Elizabeth Meek (trans), 163–179. Coral Gables FL: University of Miami Press.
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1994. Le perifrasi abituali in italiano ed in inglese. Quaderni del Laboratorio di Lingüística 8: 32–41.
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Lenci, Alessandro. 2012. Habituality, pluractionality, and imperfectivity. In Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Robert Binnick (ed.), 852–880. Oxford: OUP.
Bhatt, Rajesh. 1997. Obligation and possession. In Papers from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable on Argument Structure and Aspect [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 32], Heidi Harley (ed.), 21–40. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.
Binnick, Robert I. 2005. The markers of habitual aspect in English. Journal of English Linguistics 33(4): 339–369.
Bolin, Inge. 2010. Rituals of Respect: The Secret of Survival in the High Peruvian Andes. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
Boneh, Nora & Doron, Edit. 2008. Habituality and the habitual aspect. In Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 110], Susan Deborah Rothstein (ed.), 321–349. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Boneh, Nora & Doron, Edit. 2013. Hab and Gen in the expression of habituality. In Genericity, Alda Mari, Claire Beyssade & Fabio del Prete (eds), 176–191. Oxford: OUP.
Brinton, Laurel J. 1987. The aspectual nature of states and habits. Folia Linguistica 21(2–4): 195–214.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo. 2008. Quechumara: Estructuras paralelas de las lenguas quechua y aymara. La Paz: Centro de Investigación y Promoción del Campesinado.
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo. 2003. Lingüística Quechua. Cuzco: Centro De Estudios Regionales Andinos “Bartolomé De Las Casas”.
Clancy, Steven J. 2010. The Chain of Being and Having in Slavic [Studies in Language Companion Series 122]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: CUP.
Cusihumán, Antonio G. 1976. Gramática quechua: Cuzco-Collao. Lima: Ministerio de Educación: Instituto De Estudios Peruanos.
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1968. Studien zur verbalen Pluralität: Iterativum, Distributivum, Durativum, Intensivum in der allgemeinen Grammatik, im Lateinischen und Hethitischen [Österr. Akad. der Wiss., Phil.-Hist. Kl., 259.1]. Wien: Hermann Böhlaus.
Gildea, Spike. 2008. Explaining similarities between main clauses and nominalized phrases. La Structure des Langues Amazoniennes 32: 57–75.
GKM = See Mamani et al.
Hantson, André. 2005. The English perfect and the anti-perfect used to viewed from a comparative perspective. English Studies 86(3): 245–268.
Hintz, Daniel J. 2007. Aspect and Aspectual Interfaces in South Conchucos Quechua: The Emergence of Grammatical Systems. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Huarochiri = See Taylor.
Isačenko, Alexander V. 1974. On have and be languages: A typological sketch. Slavic Forum: Essays in Linguistics and Literature, 43–77. The Hague: Mouton.
Lanata, Xavier Ricard. 2010. Annexes. Les voleurs d’ombre: l’Univers religieux des bergers de l’Ausangate, Andes centrales. Société d’ethnologie. <
[URL] (4 June 2013).
Mamani, Gregorio Condori, Valderrama Fernández, Ricardo & Escalante Gutiérrez, Carmen. 1983. De nosotros, los Runas: Autobiografía. Madrid: Alfaguara.
Mathiassen, Terje. 1996. Tense, Mood and Aspect in Lithuanian and Latvian. Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo, Blavisk-baltisk avdeling.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. The tenses of verb. In Elements of Symbolic Logic, 287–298. New York NY: Macmillan.
RXL = See Lanata.
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 2002. Recent activity in the theory of aspect: Accomplishments, achievements, or just non-progressive state. Linguistic Typology 6(2): 199–271.
Stark, Louisa Rowell. 1971. Sucre Quechua: A Pedagogical Grammar. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin.
